From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C0B1C433DF for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2020 02:09:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D236720737 for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2020 02:09:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="fRA0ZRtW" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D236720737 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B0TXX3Y8bzDqYS for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2020 12:09:32 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com (client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::342; helo=mail-wm1-x342.google.com; envelope-from=oohall@gmail.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20161025 header.b=fRA0ZRtW; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail-wm1-x342.google.com (mail-wm1-x342.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::342]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B0SqG14X7zDqWk for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2020 11:37:14 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-wm1-x342.google.com with SMTP id o8so37588449wmh.4 for ; Sun, 05 Jul 2020 18:37:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=6RyZ7uB0v+OlyoQFm2LwCsK4RBwvZxTlO8pK1Eq56eU=; b=fRA0ZRtW20FOrtUTvTBKV/kavXKKB+ZPjGYnKVpjl7bjFxJ2z7m4qhgk5dep1WBxig I3rBhut66UaHHWKvgpct+RfwIhWwUgIuJVKtrj1f9JIA8oOFMu7P5mZ8w1sy3eUZrTfi yXfeUW6xnfw8ijxrZWmtAblZW1WSDSufNDXZTwe1uicFoGAoE4gq6J7wDGPZTvcNsxsW F4UqX64KNm7im05jbQ/V1yu7TXHWa+nomZA/7MTreWbzyc1ISst89szcyC0kNEVkdiup l7Po9TXNN+1PaEulU5V8L3enkucQARpdAGuviszjmIuixSNUY5SW3RiFgEE6AH7LRcPd 2cpw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=6RyZ7uB0v+OlyoQFm2LwCsK4RBwvZxTlO8pK1Eq56eU=; b=CMZT8geTdWYgk8ep1u0e3ygzeKH66hRPwq3BohJ8TTvCZ/gSomUHi2rS3GzvRTKPo8 AeNkL9EQjzxnRBPGK0RF2IYxggSlDu27+uJUOzNrAew69vJHLFLJwrHWxr3VcDMA8Gdv 7nKkIttfcxjfG1K10IT2cNGRU/R8pbyynrrQad3lyfenAWN1E98B6821thvx3B8R0rJ+ MopfGNehBmNHn02VZOc3UlRaAwKHib0wum+O++QRsa6jyJkvqmCf+W5p1uOIu6MwuL1b cKpwKGnD1iti1EeQzvGRvYSMo8mTd6JQ1FnwwybDfW+2joWKPMuKtlOHLUVKh2J3H5BD rP9g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533cfHY+zS2TcEKVvljg2zskIIhCy1Y9xY1tkZf5FBSBa1meZUXv YtWuz/Kfcw4HRX3srS1tDI4u/gzPahM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz7FRj+nGlyNv/cJT3BUvVDqFXOEKSkJYdJMCJGu1+ZTsrrHReg4cyn0wChqhP/fdxsSlo/NQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:2253:: with SMTP id a19mr44707657wmm.136.1593999429286; Sun, 05 Jul 2020 18:37:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 192-168-1-18.tpgi.com.au (59-102-73-59.tpgi.com.au. [59.102.73.59]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v6sm9533392wrr.85.2020.07.05.18.37.06 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 05 Jul 2020 18:37:08 -0700 (PDT) From: Oliver O'Halloran To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: [PATCH 12/14] powerpc/eeh: Rename eeh_{add_to|remove_from}_parent_pe() Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2020 11:36:17 +1000 Message-Id: <20200706013619.459420-13-oohall@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.26.2 In-Reply-To: <20200706013619.459420-1-oohall@gmail.com> References: <20200706013619.459420-1-oohall@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Oliver O'Halloran , mahesh@linux.ibm.com Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" The naming of eeh_{add_to|remove_from}_parent_pe() doesn't really reflect what they actually do. If the PE referred to be edev->pe_config_addr already exists under that PHB then the edev is added to that PE. However, if the PE doesn't exist the a new one is created for the edev. The bulk of the implementation of eeh_add_to_parent_pe() covers that second case. Similarly, most of eeh_remove_from_parent_pe() is determining when it's safe to delete a PE. Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran --- arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h | 4 ++-- arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c | 4 ++-- arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_driver.c | 2 +- arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c | 8 ++++---- arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c | 2 +- arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c | 2 +- arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c | 8 ++++---- 7 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h index a2f7ed204ece..8d34e5b790c2 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h @@ -283,8 +283,8 @@ struct eeh_pe *eeh_phb_pe_get(struct pci_controller *phb); struct eeh_pe *eeh_pe_next(struct eeh_pe *pe, struct eeh_pe *root); struct eeh_pe *eeh_pe_get(struct pci_controller *phb, int pe_no, int config_addr); -int eeh_add_to_parent_pe(struct eeh_dev *edev); -int eeh_rmv_from_parent_pe(struct eeh_dev *edev); +int eeh_pe_tree_insert(struct eeh_dev *edev); +int eeh_pe_tree_remove(struct eeh_dev *edev); void eeh_pe_update_time_stamp(struct eeh_pe *pe); void *eeh_pe_traverse(struct eeh_pe *root, eeh_pe_traverse_func fn, void *flag); diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c index f203ffc5c57d..94682382fc8c 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c @@ -1107,7 +1107,7 @@ void eeh_probe_device(struct pci_dev *dev) * FIXME: HEY MA, LOOK AT ME, NO LOCKING! */ if (edev->pdev && edev->pdev != dev) { - eeh_rmv_from_parent_pe(edev); + eeh_pe_tree_remove(edev); eeh_addr_cache_rmv_dev(edev->pdev); eeh_sysfs_remove_device(edev->pdev); @@ -1186,7 +1186,7 @@ void eeh_remove_device(struct pci_dev *dev) edev->in_error = false; dev->dev.archdata.edev = NULL; if (!(edev->pe->state & EEH_PE_KEEP)) - eeh_rmv_from_parent_pe(edev); + eeh_pe_tree_remove(edev); else edev->mode |= EEH_DEV_DISCONNECTED; } diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_driver.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_driver.c index b84d3cb2532e..4197e4559f65 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_driver.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_driver.c @@ -542,7 +542,7 @@ static void *eeh_pe_detach_dev(struct eeh_pe *pe, void *userdata) continue; edev->mode &= ~(EEH_DEV_DISCONNECTED | EEH_DEV_IRQ_DISABLED); - eeh_rmv_from_parent_pe(edev); + eeh_pe_tree_remove(edev); } return NULL; diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c index f20fb0ee6aec..97bf09db2ecd 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c @@ -356,7 +356,7 @@ static struct eeh_pe *eeh_pe_get_parent(struct eeh_dev *edev) } /** - * eeh_add_to_parent_pe - Add EEH device to parent PE + * eeh_pe_tree_insert - Add EEH device to parent PE * @edev: EEH device * * Add EEH device to the parent PE. If the parent PE already @@ -364,7 +364,7 @@ static struct eeh_pe *eeh_pe_get_parent(struct eeh_dev *edev) * we have to create new PE to hold the EEH device and the new * PE will be linked to its parent PE as well. */ -int eeh_add_to_parent_pe(struct eeh_dev *edev) +int eeh_pe_tree_insert(struct eeh_dev *edev) { struct eeh_pe *pe, *parent; struct pci_dn *pdn = eeh_dev_to_pdn(edev); @@ -459,7 +459,7 @@ int eeh_add_to_parent_pe(struct eeh_dev *edev) } /** - * eeh_rmv_from_parent_pe - Remove one EEH device from the associated PE + * eeh_pe_tree_remove - Remove one EEH device from the associated PE * @edev: EEH device * * The PE hierarchy tree might be changed when doing PCI hotplug. @@ -467,7 +467,7 @@ int eeh_add_to_parent_pe(struct eeh_dev *edev) * during EEH recovery. So we have to call the function remove the * corresponding PE accordingly if necessary. */ -int eeh_rmv_from_parent_pe(struct eeh_dev *edev) +int eeh_pe_tree_remove(struct eeh_dev *edev) { struct eeh_pe *pe, *parent, *child; bool keep, recover; diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c index bf11ac8427ac..e99b7c547d7e 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c @@ -263,7 +263,7 @@ void remove_sriov_vf_pdns(struct pci_dev *pdev) * have a configured PE. */ if (edev->pe) - eeh_rmv_from_parent_pe(edev); + eeh_pe_tree_remove(edev); pdn->edev = NULL; kfree(edev); diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c index 7cbb03a97a61..8c9fca773692 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c @@ -399,7 +399,7 @@ static struct eeh_dev *pnv_eeh_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev) edev->pe_config_addr = phb->ioda.pe_rmap[config_addr]; /* Create PE */ - ret = eeh_add_to_parent_pe(edev); + ret = eeh_pe_tree_insert(edev); if (ret) { eeh_edev_warn(edev, "Failed to add device to PE (code %d)\n", ret); return NULL; diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c index daf6caeca8f0..72556f4436a8 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c @@ -71,8 +71,8 @@ void pseries_pcibios_bus_add_device(struct pci_dev *pdev) struct eeh_dev *edev = pdn_to_eeh_dev(pdn); edev->pe_config_addr = (pdn->busno << 16) | (pdn->devfn << 8); - eeh_rmv_from_parent_pe(edev); /* Remove as it is adding to bus pe */ - eeh_add_to_parent_pe(edev); /* Add as VF PE type */ + eeh_pe_tree_remove(edev); /* Remove as it is adding to bus pe */ + eeh_pe_tree_insert(edev); /* Add as VF PE type */ } #endif eeh_probe_device(pdev); @@ -315,14 +315,14 @@ void pseries_eeh_init_edev(struct pci_dn *pdn) if (enable) { eeh_add_flag(EEH_ENABLED); - eeh_add_to_parent_pe(edev); + eeh_pe_tree_insert(edev); } else if (pdn->parent && pdn_to_eeh_dev(pdn->parent) && (pdn_to_eeh_dev(pdn->parent))->pe) { /* This device doesn't support EEH, but it may have an * EEH parent, in which case we mark it as supported. */ edev->pe_config_addr = pdn_to_eeh_dev(pdn->parent)->pe_config_addr; - eeh_add_to_parent_pe(edev); + eeh_pe_tree_insert(edev); } eeh_edev_dbg(edev, "EEH is %s on device (code %d)\n", (enable ? "enabled" : "unsupported"), ret); -- 2.26.2