From: Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.ibm.com>
To: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org,
paulus@samba.org, sathnaga@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
sukadev@linux.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
bauerman@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: rework secure mem slot dropping
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2020 16:55:31 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200708112531.GA7902@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200703155914.40262-3-ldufour@linux.ibm.com>
On Fri, Jul 03, 2020 at 05:59:14PM +0200, Laurent Dufour wrote:
> When a secure memslot is dropped, all the pages backed in the secure device
> (aka really backed by secure memory by the Ultravisor) should be paged out
> to a normal page. Previously, this was achieved by triggering the page
> fault mechanism which is calling kvmppc_svm_page_out() on each pages.
>
> This can't work when hot unplugging a memory slot because the memory slot
> is flagged as invalid and gfn_to_pfn() is then not trying to access the
> page, so the page fault mechanism is not triggered.
>
> Since the final goal is to make a call to kvmppc_svm_page_out() it seems
> simpler to directly calling it instead of triggering such a mechanism. This
> way kvmppc_uvmem_drop_pages() can be called even when hot unplugging a
> memslot.
Yes, this appears much simpler.
>
> Since kvmppc_uvmem_drop_pages() is already holding kvm->arch.uvmem_lock,
> the call to __kvmppc_svm_page_out() is made.
> As __kvmppc_svm_page_out needs the vma pointer to migrate the pages, the
> VMA is fetched in a lazy way, to not trigger find_vma() all the time. In
> addition, the mmap_sem is help in read mode during that time, not in write
> mode since the virual memory layout is not impacted, and
> kvm->arch.uvmem_lock prevents concurrent operation on the secure device.
>
> Cc: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
> Cc: Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_uvmem.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_uvmem.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_uvmem.c
> index 852cc9ae6a0b..479ddf16d18c 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_uvmem.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_uvmem.c
> @@ -533,35 +533,55 @@ static inline int kvmppc_svm_page_out(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> * fault on them, do fault time migration to replace the device PTEs in
> * QEMU page table with normal PTEs from newly allocated pages.
> */
> -void kvmppc_uvmem_drop_pages(const struct kvm_memory_slot *free,
> +void kvmppc_uvmem_drop_pages(const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
> struct kvm *kvm, bool skip_page_out)
> {
> int i;
> struct kvmppc_uvmem_page_pvt *pvt;
> - unsigned long pfn, uvmem_pfn;
> - unsigned long gfn = free->base_gfn;
> + struct page *uvmem_page;
> + struct vm_area_struct *vma = NULL;
> + unsigned long uvmem_pfn, gfn;
> + unsigned long addr, end;
> +
> + down_read(&kvm->mm->mmap_sem);
You should be using mmap_read_lock(kvm->mm) with recent kernels.
> +
> + addr = slot->userspace_addr;
> + end = addr + (slot->npages * PAGE_SIZE);
>
> - for (i = free->npages; i; --i, ++gfn) {
> - struct page *uvmem_page;
> + gfn = slot->base_gfn;
> + for (i = slot->npages; i; --i, ++gfn, addr += PAGE_SIZE) {
> +
> + /* Fetch the VMA if addr is not in the latest fetched one */
> + if (!vma || (addr < vma->vm_start || addr >= vma->vm_end)) {
> + vma = find_vma_intersection(kvm->mm, addr, end);
> + if (!vma ||
> + vma->vm_start > addr || vma->vm_end < end) {
> + pr_err("Can't find VMA for gfn:0x%lx\n", gfn);
> + break;
> + }
> + }
The first find_vma_intersection() was called for the range spanning the
entire memslot, but you have code to check if vma remains valid for the
new addr in each iteration. Guess you wanted to get vma for one page at
a time and use it for subsequent pages until it covers the range?
Regards,
Bharata.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-08 11:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-03 15:59 [PATCH 0/2] Rework secure memslot dropping Laurent Dufour
2020-07-03 15:59 ` [PATCH 1/2] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: move kvmppc_svm_page_out up Laurent Dufour
2020-07-03 15:59 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: rework secure mem slot dropping Laurent Dufour
2020-07-08 11:25 ` Bharata B Rao [this message]
2020-07-08 12:16 ` Laurent Dufour
2020-07-09 11:13 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-07-21 5:46 ` Paul Mackerras
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200708112531.GA7902@in.ibm.com \
--to=bharata@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bauerman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ldufour@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=sathnaga@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=sukadev@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).