From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08A31C433E0 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 14:34:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E26D22515 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 14:34:09 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 3E26D22515 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B5jgy6Qy3zDqdl for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 00:34:06 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com (client-ip=45.249.212.32; helo=huawei.com; envelope-from=weiyongjun1@huawei.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Received: from huawei.com (szxga06-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.32]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B5jZq5YFSzDqNL for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 00:29:36 +1000 (AEST) Received: from DGGEMS406-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.58]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 51AE2774C1BD5835F576; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 22:14:02 +0800 (CST) Received: from kernelci-master.huawei.com (10.175.101.6) by DGGEMS406-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.206) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.487.0; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 22:13:52 +0800 From: Wei Yongjun To: Hulk Robot , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Viresh Kumar , Michael Ellerman Subject: [PATCH -next] cpufreq: powernv: Make some symbols static Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2020 22:23:55 +0800 Message-ID: <20200714142355.29819-1-weiyongjun1@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.175.101.6] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Wei Yongjun , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" The sparse tool complains as follows: drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c:88:1: warning: symbol 'pstate_revmap' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c:383:18: warning: symbol 'cpufreq_freq_attr_cpuinfo_nominal_freq' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c:669:6: warning: symbol 'gpstate_timer_handler' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c:902:6: warning: symbol 'powernv_cpufreq_work_fn' was not declared. Should it be static? Those symbols are not used outside of this file, so mark them static. Reported-by: Hulk Robot Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun --- drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c index 8646eb197cd9..cf118263ec65 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ struct global_pstate_info { static struct cpufreq_frequency_table powernv_freqs[POWERNV_MAX_PSTATES+1]; -DEFINE_HASHTABLE(pstate_revmap, POWERNV_MAX_PSTATES_ORDER); +static DEFINE_HASHTABLE(pstate_revmap, POWERNV_MAX_PSTATES_ORDER); /** * struct pstate_idx_revmap_data: Entry in the hashmap pstate_revmap * indexed by a function of pstate id. @@ -380,7 +380,7 @@ static ssize_t cpuinfo_nominal_freq_show(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, powernv_freqs[powernv_pstate_info.nominal].frequency); } -struct freq_attr cpufreq_freq_attr_cpuinfo_nominal_freq = +static struct freq_attr cpufreq_freq_attr_cpuinfo_nominal_freq = __ATTR_RO(cpuinfo_nominal_freq); #define SCALING_BOOST_FREQS_ATTR_INDEX 2 @@ -666,7 +666,7 @@ static inline void queue_gpstate_timer(struct global_pstate_info *gpstates) * according quadratic equation. Queues a new timer if it is still not equal * to local pstate */ -void gpstate_timer_handler(struct timer_list *t) +static void gpstate_timer_handler(struct timer_list *t) { struct global_pstate_info *gpstates = from_timer(gpstates, t, timer); struct cpufreq_policy *policy = gpstates->policy; @@ -899,7 +899,7 @@ static struct notifier_block powernv_cpufreq_reboot_nb = { .notifier_call = powernv_cpufreq_reboot_notifier, }; -void powernv_cpufreq_work_fn(struct work_struct *work) +static void powernv_cpufreq_work_fn(struct work_struct *work) { struct chip *chip = container_of(work, struct chip, throttle); struct cpufreq_policy *policy;