From: Satheesh Rajendran <sathnaga@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Nathan Lynch <nathanl@linux.ibm.com>,
Gautham R Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>,
Satheesh Rajendran <sathnaga@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Optimization to improve cpu online/offline on Powerpc
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 18:24:02 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200729125402.GA65853@satheesh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200727075532.30058-1-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 01:25:25PM +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> Anton reported that his 4096 cpu (1024 cores in a socket) was taking too
> long to boot. He also analyzed that most of the time was being spent on
> updating cpu_core_mask.
>
> Here are some optimizations and fixes to make ppc64_cpu --smt=8/ppc64_cpu
> --smt=1 run faster and hence boot the kernel also faster.
>
> Its based on top of my v4 coregroup support patchset.
> http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200727053230.19753-1-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com/t/#u
>
> The first two patches should solve Anton's immediate problem.
> On the unofficial patches, Anton reported that the boot time came from 30
> mins to 6 seconds. (Basically a high core count in a single socket
> configuration). Satheesh also reported similar numbers.
>
> The rest are simple cleanups/optimizations.
>
> Since cpu_core_mask is an exported symbol for a long duration, lets retain
> as a snapshot of cpumask_of_node.
boot tested on P9 KVM guest.
without this series:
# dmesg|grep smp
[ 0.066624] smp: Bringing up secondary CPUs ...
[ 347.521264] smp: Brought up 1 node, 2048 CPUs
with this series:
# dmesg|grep smp
[ 0.067744] smp: Bringing up secondary CPUs ...
[ 5.416910] smp: Brought up 1 node, 2048 CPUs
Tested-by: Satheesh Rajendran <sathnaga@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Regards,
-Satheesh
>
> Architecture: ppc64le
> Byte Order: Little Endian
> CPU(s): 160
> On-line CPU(s) list: 0-159
> Thread(s) per core: 4
> Core(s) per socket: 20
> Socket(s): 2
> NUMA node(s): 2
> Model: 2.2 (pvr 004e 1202)
> Model name: POWER9, altivec supported
> CPU max MHz: 3800.0000
> CPU min MHz: 2166.0000
> L1d cache: 32K
> L1i cache: 32K
> L2 cache: 512K
> L3 cache: 10240K
> NUMA node0 CPU(s): 0-79
> NUMA node8 CPU(s): 80-159
>
> without patch (powerpc/next)
> [ 0.099347] smp: Bringing up secondary CPUs ...
> [ 0.832513] smp: Brought up 2 nodes, 160 CPUs
>
> with powerpc/next + coregroup support patchset
> [ 0.099241] smp: Bringing up secondary CPUs ...
> [ 0.835627] smp: Brought up 2 nodes, 160 CPUs
>
> with powerpc/next + coregroup + this patchset
> [ 0.097232] smp: Bringing up secondary CPUs ...
> [ 0.528457] smp: Brought up 2 nodes, 160 CPUs
>
> x ppc64_cpu --smt=1
> + ppc64_cpu --smt=4
>
> without patch
> N Min Max Median Avg Stddev
> x 100 11.82 17.06 14.01 14.05 1.2665247
> + 100 12.25 16.59 13.86 14.1143 1.164293
>
> with patch
> N Min Max Median Avg Stddev
> x 100 12.68 16.15 14.24 14.238 0.75489246
> + 100 12.93 15.85 14.35 14.2897 0.60041813
>
> Cc: linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
> Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
> Cc: Anton Blanchard <anton@ozlabs.org>
> Cc: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>
> Cc: Nathan Lynch <nathanl@linux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>
> Cc: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: Satheesh Rajendran <sathnaga@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
>
> Srikar Dronamraju (7):
> powerpc/topology: Update topology_core_cpumask
> powerpc/smp: Stop updating cpu_core_mask
> powerpc/smp: Remove get_physical_package_id
> powerpc/smp: Optimize remove_cpu_from_masks
> powerpc/smp: Limit cpus traversed to within a node.
> powerpc/smp: Stop passing mask to update_mask_by_l2
> powerpc/smp: Depend on cpu_l1_cache_map when adding cpus
>
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/smp.h | 5 --
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/topology.h | 7 +--
> arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c | 79 +++++++++--------------------
> 3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.17.1
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-29 12:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-27 7:55 [PATCH 0/7] Optimization to improve cpu online/offline on Powerpc Srikar Dronamraju
2020-07-27 7:55 ` [PATCH 1/7] powerpc/topology: Update topology_core_cpumask Srikar Dronamraju
2020-07-27 7:55 ` [PATCH 2/7] powerpc/smp: Stop updating cpu_core_mask Srikar Dronamraju
2020-07-27 7:55 ` [PATCH 3/7] powerpc/smp: Remove get_physical_package_id Srikar Dronamraju
2020-07-27 7:55 ` [PATCH 4/7] powerpc/smp: Optimize remove_cpu_from_masks Srikar Dronamraju
2020-07-27 7:55 ` [PATCH 5/7] powerpc/smp: Limit cpus traversed to within a node Srikar Dronamraju
2020-07-27 7:55 ` [PATCH 6/7] powerpc/smp: Stop passing mask to update_mask_by_l2 Srikar Dronamraju
2020-07-27 7:55 ` [PATCH 7/7] powerpc/smp: Depend on cpu_l1_cache_map when adding cpus Srikar Dronamraju
2020-07-29 12:54 ` Satheesh Rajendran [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200729125402.GA65853@satheesh \
--to=sathnaga@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mikey@neuling.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=nathanl@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=oohall@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).