From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8943EC433DF for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 07:11:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32C152086A for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 07:11:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="FJxWR+qO" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 32C152086A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BLQsK4WFmzDqMC for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 17:11:17 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com (client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::641; helo=mail-pl1-x641.google.com; envelope-from=nicoleotsuka@gmail.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20161025 header.b=FJxWR+qO; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail-pl1-x641.google.com (mail-pl1-x641.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::641]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BLQpK1QFjzDqWR for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 17:08:39 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-pl1-x641.google.com with SMTP id u10so12841324plr.7 for ; Tue, 04 Aug 2020 00:08:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=mzXdPa02PNZzMci8IWENzcnutMB+4gkEmRjStQUBDRM=; b=FJxWR+qOBFsh8CQGiDEQC8hToTRhgA/qqWs7y8eQUAmKiS8qZGtnYHWm7UGrC4VXwI nKd/gEwt7T3y2Pc7p2FHBCPVC59iPibzT40Y6Sifh1NvqOV63ysCzcOAtLhqFmu2UoeQ uJ37ZDv4XOoXTEiz7UnGpDHuTqFMMYsywPgoOsx7X5eoQ6UYpBcAHD+jyvHyKr6qKcVK bqyYJyuXYBM1dazvCGekdJLZqof+OG8wgX3UGb54IMl/mO6V1jmdPROXI6Nt/3TCkntw buqZVTgvcIMZoLoJthtCGICijJk1BggUvkNb9hHEWEMSIPY3mQzfBwW7c91cKfQv7RUC aC5Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=mzXdPa02PNZzMci8IWENzcnutMB+4gkEmRjStQUBDRM=; b=HFpdTU/rAG7+JPPF8EWmimf19ZZw8DhlI2EGqQTuAbZZVrLs4aB5dohsuO2agHod6i uLOZPu+U5mrd2KoqkpppGtkKTbTJzknOm5HG8EHGsQYAa/aXnguEsCOs9c3GiKBi7O1I AtzHtH4UUkdymKPQZUBWXXz3vf+exIrr0JbLEqV+IYvxCuue5HVD0jqQUxVLSOhWTE/G 8NHLLI3p4XTu5rMRHjn1nZmozHsjR7KEcco9D7acgEHmiv8e9UFYrhNdgd0cx3IUIq1J ktuQ1p1GAZFElxd8d3Jfy3TAsw6nV1FrJbiLh87mwkDzyNo2DkaRP4pjZ4UpfMBLGifc /BpA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532Mj2roVptL+yUCiIAiT7NGW9Uf0V5SpIqYMYG9L50HP1wjh0NI 4Gf9+c6TyZC9uRQHBwlYVkk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzoO2sSiVYAeTFp6Xafg+M195gcnGBGyWqm7EBvLEW9UKTZpQq+/QC5jiS32PNmce7SBnexKg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:fe10:: with SMTP id g16mr3514973plj.43.1596524916406; Tue, 04 Aug 2020 00:08:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Asurada-Nvidia (searspoint.nvidia.com. [216.228.112.21]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b22sm13846476pfb.52.2020.08.04.00.08.35 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 04 Aug 2020 00:08:36 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2020 00:08:25 -0700 From: Nicolin Chen To: Shengjiu Wang Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: fsl_sai: Clean code for synchronize mode Message-ID: <20200804070825.GB27658@Asurada-Nvidia> References: <20200803054037.GA1056@Asurada-Nvidia> <20200803215735.GA5461@Asurada-Nvidia> <20200804021114.GA15390@Asurada-Nvidia> <20200804030004.GA27028@Asurada-Nvidia> <20200804070345.GA27658@Asurada-Nvidia> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200804070345.GA27658@Asurada-Nvidia> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Linux-ALSA , Timur Tabi , Xiubo Li , Fabio Estevam , Shengjiu Wang , Takashi Iwai , Liam Girdwood , Mark Brown , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 12:03:46AM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote: > On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 12:22:53PM +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote: > > > > > Btw, do we need similar change for TRIGGER_STOP? > > > > > > This is a good question. It is better to do change for STOP, > > > but I am afraid that there is no much test to guarantee the result. > > > Maybe we can do this change for STOP. > > The idea looks good to me...(check inline comments) > > > diff --git a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_sai.c b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_sai.c > > index 1c0e06bb3783..6e4be398eaee 100644 > > --- a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_sai.c > > +++ b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_sai.c > > @@ -517,6 +517,37 @@ static int fsl_sai_hw_free(struct > > snd_pcm_substream *substream, > > return 0; > > } > > > > +static void fsl_sai_config_disable(struct fsl_sai *sai, bool tx) > > +{ > > + unsigned int ofs = sai->soc_data->reg_offset; > > + u32 xcsr, count = 100; > > + > > + regmap_update_bits(sai->regmap, FSL_SAI_xCSR(tx, ofs), > > + FSL_SAI_CSR_TERE, 0); > > + > > + /* TERE will remain set till the end of current frame */ > > + do { > > + udelay(10); > > + regmap_read(sai->regmap, FSL_SAI_xCSR(tx, ofs), &xcsr); > > + } while (--count && xcsr & FSL_SAI_CSR_TERE); > > + > > + regmap_update_bits(sai->regmap, FSL_SAI_xCSR(tx, ofs), > > + FSL_SAI_CSR_FR, FSL_SAI_CSR_FR); > > + > > + /* > > + * For sai master mode, after several open/close sai, > > + * there will be no frame clock, and can't recover > > + * anymore. Add software reset to fix this issue. > > + * This is a hardware bug, and will be fix in the > > + * next sai version. > > + */ > > + if (!sai->is_slave_mode) { > > + /* Software Reset for both Tx and Rx */ > > Remove "for both Tx and Rx" > > > /* Check if the opposite FRDE is also disabled */ > > regmap_read(sai->regmap, FSL_SAI_xCSR(!tx, ofs), &xcsr); > > + if (sai->synchronous[tx] && !sai->synchronous[!tx] && !(xcsr & FSL_SAI_CSR_FRDE)) > > + fsl_sai_config_disable(sai, !tx); > > > + if (sai->synchronous[tx] || !sai->synchronous[!tx] || !(xcsr & FSL_SAI_CSR_FRDE)) > > + fsl_sai_config_disable(sai, tx); > > The first "||" should probably be "&&". > > The trigger() logic is way more complicated than a simple cleanup > in my opinion. Would suggest to split RMR part out of this change. > > And for conditions like "sync[tx] && !sync[!tx]", it'd be better > to have a helper function to improve readability: > > /** > * fsl_sai_dir_is_synced - Check if stream is synced by the opposite stream > * > * SAI supports synchronous mode using bit/frame clocks of either Transmitter's > * or Receiver's for both streams. This function is used to check if clocks of > * current stream's are synced by the opposite stream. Aww..this should be a generic function, so drop "current": * or Receiver's for both streams. This function is used to check if clocks of * the stream's are synced by the opposite stream. > * > * @sai: SAI context > * @dir: direction of current stream Ditto: * @dir: stream direction Thanks. ----- > */ > static inline bool fsl_sai_dir_is_synced(struct fsl_sai *sai, int dir) > { > int adir = (dir == TX) ? RX : TX; > > /* current dir in async mode while opposite dir in sync mode */ > return !sai->synchronous[dir] && sai->synchronous[adir]; > } > > Then add more comments in trigger: > > static ...trigger() > { > bool tx = substream->stream == SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK; > int adir = tx ? RX : TX; > int dir = tx ? TX : RX; > > // .... > { > // ... > > /* Check if the opposite FRDE is also disabled */ > regmap_read(sai->regmap, FSL_SAI_xCSR(!tx, ofs), &xcsr); > > /* > * If opposite stream provides clocks for synchronous mode and > * it is inactive, disable it before disabling the current one > */ > if (fsl_sai_dir_is_synced(adir) && !(xcsr & FSL_SAI_CSR_FRDE)) > fsl_sai_config_disable(sai, adir); > > /* > * Disable current stream if either of: > * 1. current stream doesn't provide clocks for synchronous mode > * 2. current stream provides clocks for synchronous mode but no > * more stream is active. > */ > if (!fsl_sai_dir_is_synced(dir) || !(xcsr & FSL_SAI_CSR_FRDE)) > fsl_sai_config_disable(sai, dir); > > // ... > } > // .... > } > > Note, in fsl_sai_config_disable(sai, dir): > bool tx = dir == TX; > > Above all, I am just drafting, so please test it thoroughly :)