From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5C25C433DF for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 12:34:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A804222E00 for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 12:34:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="G8KATEOt" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org A804222E00 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BMnwk4d9RzDqn1 for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 22:33:58 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org (client-ip=198.145.29.99; helo=mail.kernel.org; envelope-from=acme@kernel.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=G8KATEOt; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BMndl20BRzDqlB for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 22:20:59 +1000 (AEST) Received: from quaco.ghostprotocols.net (unknown [179.162.129.152]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 60F6122D03; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 12:20:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1596716455; bh=BNTPnjp8uCLBloIL6H7X+Nr6ROKedHB8cPRuja71qEs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=G8KATEOtPaitqZWGuUsl2fHoO8xBt3tgvMmFiZgtVh5NzuE7ZrqefXIN9OPVRt/DL QJFQkHXggwdIvlal4KR/kXOaKujQK1iyb7qTQFZi9LjBApdNYA/doU0HYqQZ3N7r9b X4QqGAzCEs05K0v3PxSDYwzFkW34bzPMQ3DcjiUQ= Received: by quaco.ghostprotocols.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1467B40524; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 09:20:53 -0300 (-03) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2020 09:20:52 -0300 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Athira Rajeev Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 0/4] powerpc/perf: Add support for perf extended regs in powerpc Message-ID: <20200806122052.GC71359@kernel.org> References: <1595870184-1460-1-git-send-email-atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <27D1CE26-A506-4CFF-B1C2-E0545F26E637@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20200730195048.GA1484375@krava> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Url: http://acmel.wordpress.com X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Ravi Bangoria , Michael Neuling , maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com, kjain@linux.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Jiri Olsa , Jiri Olsa Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Em Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 11:04:14PM +0530, Athira Rajeev escreveu: > > > > On 31-Jul-2020, at 1:20 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 01:24:40PM +0530, Athira Rajeev wrote: > >> > >> > >>> On 27-Jul-2020, at 10:46 PM, Athira Rajeev wrote: > >>> > >>> Patch set to add support for perf extended register capability in > >>> powerpc. The capability flag PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS, is used to > >>> indicate the PMU which support extended registers. The generic code > >>> define the mask of extended registers as 0 for non supported architectures. > >>> > >>> Patches 1 and 2 are the kernel side changes needed to include > >>> base support for extended regs in powerpc and in power10. > >>> Patches 3 and 4 are the perf tools side changes needed to support the > >>> extended registers. > >>> > >> > >> Hi Arnaldo, Jiri > >> > >> please let me know if you have any comments/suggestions on this patch series to add support for perf extended regs. > > > > hi, > > can't really tell for powerpc, but in general > > perf tool changes look ok > > > > Hi Jiri, > Thanks for checking the patchset. So I'dd say you submit a v6, split into the kernel part, that probably should go via the PPC arch tree, and I can pick the tooling part, ok? - Arnaldo