From: Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com>
To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] selftests/powerpc: Fix prefixes in alignment_handler signal handler
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 23:12:31 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200824131231.14008-1-jniethe5@gmail.com> (raw)
The signal handler in the alignment handler self test has the ability to
jump over the instruction that triggered the signal. It does this by
incrementing the PT_NIP in the user context by 4. If it were a prefixed
instruction this will mean that the suffix is then executed which is
incorrect. Instead check if the major opcode indicates a prefixed
instruction (e.g. it is 1) and if so increment PT_NIP by 8.
If ISA v3.1 is not available treat it as a word instruction even if the
major opcode is 1.
Fixes: 620a6473df36 ("selftests/powerpc: Add prefixed loads/stores to
alignment_handler test")
Signed-off-by: Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com>
---
.../selftests/powerpc/alignment/alignment_handler.c | 11 ++++++++++-
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/alignment/alignment_handler.c b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/alignment/alignment_handler.c
index 55ef15184057..c197ff828120 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/alignment/alignment_handler.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/alignment/alignment_handler.c
@@ -64,12 +64,14 @@ int bufsize;
int debug;
int testing;
volatile int gotsig;
+bool haveprefixes;
char *cipath = "/dev/fb0";
long cioffset;
void sighandler(int sig, siginfo_t *info, void *ctx)
{
ucontext_t *ucp = ctx;
+ u32 inst;
if (!testing) {
signal(sig, SIG_DFL);
@@ -77,7 +79,12 @@ void sighandler(int sig, siginfo_t *info, void *ctx)
}
gotsig = sig;
#ifdef __powerpc64__
- ucp->uc_mcontext.gp_regs[PT_NIP] += 4;
+ if (haveprefixes) {
+ inst = *(u32 *)ucp->uc_mcontext.gp_regs[PT_NIP];
+ ucp->uc_mcontext.gp_regs[PT_NIP] += ((inst >> 26 == 1) ? 8 : 4);
+ } else {
+ ucp->uc_mcontext.gp_regs[PT_NIP] += 4;
+ }
#else
ucp->uc_mcontext.uc_regs->gregs[PT_NIP] += 4;
#endif
@@ -648,6 +655,8 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
exit(1);
}
+ haveprefixes = have_hwcap2(PPC_FEATURE2_ARCH_3_1);
+
rc |= test_harness(test_alignment_handler_vsx_206,
"test_alignment_handler_vsx_206");
rc |= test_harness(test_alignment_handler_vsx_207,
--
2.17.1
next reply other threads:[~2020-08-24 13:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-24 13:12 Jordan Niethe [this message]
2020-08-26 7:27 ` [PATCH] selftests/powerpc: Fix prefixes in alignment_handler signal handler Jordan Niethe
2020-09-09 13:27 ` Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200824131231.14008-1-jniethe5@gmail.com \
--to=jniethe5@gmail.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox