From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, TVD_SUBJ_WIPE_DEBT,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46947C43461 for ; Thu, 3 Sep 2020 15:59:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB2712072A for ; Thu, 3 Sep 2020 15:59:01 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org EB2712072A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lst.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Bj58M3JxTzDr0r for ; Fri, 4 Sep 2020 01:58:59 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=lst.de (client-ip=213.95.11.211; helo=verein.lst.de; envelope-from=hch@lst.de; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lst.de Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Bj3Q31SdCzDr3j for ; Fri, 4 Sep 2020 00:40:42 +1000 (AEST) Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id ACD3967357; Thu, 3 Sep 2020 16:40:37 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2020 16:40:37 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Al Viro Subject: Re: remove the last set_fs() in common code, and remove it for x86 and powerpc v3 Message-ID: <20200903144037.GA17821@lst.de> References: <20200903142242.925828-1-hch@lst.de> <20200903142803.GM1236603@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20200903143003.GA17260@lst.de> <20200903143629.GN1236603@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200903143629.GN1236603@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Kees Cook , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alexey Dobriyan , Luis Chamberlain , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , Christoph Hellwig Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 03:36:29PM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > FWIW, vfs.git#for-next is always a merge of independent branches; I don't > put stuff directly into #for-next - too easy to lose that way. > > IOW, that would be something like #base.set_fs, included into #for-next > merge set. And I've no problem with never-rebased branches... > > Where in the mainline are the most recent prereqs of this series? I can't think of anything past -rc1, but I haven't actually checked.