From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4FFCC43461 for ; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 11:22:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3267D208FE for ; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 11:22:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=chromium.org header.i=@chromium.org header.b="oKxTswLt" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 3267D208FE Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=chromium.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BpVbZ4bsWzDr69 for ; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 21:22:50 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=chromium.org (client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::643; helo=mail-pl1-x643.google.com; envelope-from=keescook@chromium.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=chromium.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=chromium.org header.i=@chromium.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=google header.b=oKxTswLt; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail-pl1-x643.google.com (mail-pl1-x643.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::643]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BpVH443jQzDqmY for ; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 21:08:32 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-pl1-x643.google.com with SMTP id g21so829829plq.1 for ; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 04:08:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=92Q8oZHyAg95yaZcgBPqYzJZs65e2ppMcBco02q7zS4=; b=oKxTswLtIOK07XsveENLHZWzEqRRWXa47NwfzGG/t34zibm0+Q5y6KxKGUyKdfoQJm WcOstLYJHtY8SjcIiE3lEzI8GfTXVy2Q+3Wr6si7RPVCGD9IY0lOI6Bzu+EU1MuOCBr+ vwWMsIRYqobBaUwMudq9qDyqwr6DmrbuVMorM= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=92Q8oZHyAg95yaZcgBPqYzJZs65e2ppMcBco02q7zS4=; b=pZ0VXWHBdSCEJf4WMD3CIEyIbJeZbyYkygaSRoGV2PXxtOp757Oe9+g6physPA/GPn aJ+5QAS2xXGDfwmrQkDGq4pWMP/az5M2y+Czbqg+C77VHJ6G0QdAxNSl0UGuo8rTknno EAIyvq+gXd/Y2vn11EOYVoFBycQqyIEpLNFkXRC9veCdZ7dKatKXlkJKmwMKOmO645He ScTr6+p65SP0b85BuDZ6tDpyh0/Y8Z5JizuinA+iPHHtmlbqcf24S5YUoU1pqfFm8GEW UgptZ8ne136MNnE3sA6r1vL4uyQGD+aUJvzt36r/pr0H6dPhxFtKIaOlnEfedZD+N9hc TXHQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530oe6oeXOZfB+PvwLy9URRnzlIGqgwVsImfModiujY6zv0jZ6MK 6+A2EGy/Jx3dlG4/ukuhNUSywA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJweZZl3gQqRJfY1jLrAEz5YsIr84x1nX2bdgki+nYDKxKRM+1q2OEofassUExMJ/pEA6/fMaQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:ea0a:: with SMTP id w10mr5837835pjy.165.1599908910885; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 04:08:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from www.outflux.net (smtp.outflux.net. [198.145.64.163]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id nl10sm3907425pjb.11.2020.09.12.04.08.25 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 12 Sep 2020 04:08:27 -0700 (PDT) From: Kees Cook To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 07/15] selftests/seccomp: Remove syscall setting #ifdefs Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2020 04:08:12 -0700 Message-Id: <20200912110820.597135-8-keescook@chromium.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20200912110820.597135-1-keescook@chromium.org> References: <20200912110820.597135-1-keescook@chromium.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo , Will Drewry , Kees Cook , linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski , Max Filippov , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Christian Brauner Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" With all architectures now using the common SYSCALL_NUM_SET() macro, the arch-specific #ifdef can be removed from change_syscall() itself. Signed-off-by: Kees Cook --- tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c | 16 +++------------- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c index aa1c224371d1..3b77bdbe7125 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c @@ -1865,20 +1865,9 @@ void change_syscall(struct __test_metadata *_metadata, iov.iov_len = sizeof(regs); ret = ptrace(PTRACE_GETREGSET, tracee, NT_PRSTATUS, &iov); #endif - EXPECT_EQ(0, ret) {} + EXPECT_EQ(0, ret); -#if defined(__x86_64__) || defined(__i386__) || defined(__powerpc__) || \ - defined(__s390__) || defined(__hppa__) || defined(__riscv) || \ - defined(__xtensa__) || defined(__csky__) || defined(__sh__) || \ - defined(__mips__) || defined(__arm__) || defined(__aarch64__) - { - SYSCALL_NUM_SET(regs, syscall); - } -#else - ASSERT_EQ(1, 0) { - TH_LOG("How is the syscall changed on this architecture?"); - } -#endif + SYSCALL_NUM_SET(regs, syscall); /* If syscall is skipped, change return value. */ if (syscall == -1) @@ -1888,6 +1877,7 @@ void change_syscall(struct __test_metadata *_metadata, SYSCALL_RET(regs) = result; #endif + /* Flush any register changes made. */ #ifdef HAVE_GETREGS ret = ptrace(PTRACE_SETREGS, tracee, 0, ®s); #else -- 2.25.1