linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: "linux-mm @ kvack . org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/4] mm: fix exec activate_mm vs TLB shootdown and lazy tlb switching race
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 14:52:16 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200914045219.3736466-2-npiggin@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200914045219.3736466-1-npiggin@gmail.com>

Reading and modifying current->mm and current->active_mm and switching
mm should be done with irqs off, to prevent races seeing an intermediate
state.

This is similar to commit 38cf307c1f20 ("mm: fix kthread_use_mm() vs TLB
invalidate"). At exec-time when the new mm is activated, the old one
should usually be single-threaded and no longer used, unless something
else is holding an mm_users reference (which may be possible).

Absent other mm_users, there is also a race with preemption and lazy tlb
switching. Consider the kernel_execve case where the current thread is
using a lazy tlb active mm:

  call_usermodehelper()
    kernel_execve()
      old_mm = current->mm;
      active_mm = current->active_mm;
      *** preempt *** -------------------->  schedule()
                                               prev->active_mm = NULL;
                                               mmdrop(prev active_mm);
                                             ...
                      <--------------------  schedule()
      current->mm = mm;
      current->active_mm = mm;
      if (!old_mm)
          mmdrop(active_mm);

If we switch back to the kernel thread from a different mm, there is a
double free of the old active_mm, and a missing free of the new one.

Closing this race only requires interrupts to be disabled while ->mm
and ->active_mm are being switched, but the TLB problem requires also
holding interrupts off over activate_mm. Unfortunately not all archs
can do that yet, e.g., arm defers the switch if irqs are disabled and
expects finish_arch_post_lock_switch() to be called to complete the
flush; um takes a blocking lock in activate_mm().

So as a first step, disable interrupts across the mm/active_mm updates
to close the lazy tlb preempt race, and provide an arch option to
extend that to activate_mm which allows architectures doing IPI based
TLB shootdowns to close the second race.

This is a bit ugly, but in the interest of fixing the bug and backporting
before all architectures are converted this is a compromise.

Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
---
 arch/Kconfig |  7 +++++++
 fs/exec.c    | 17 +++++++++++++++--
 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/Kconfig b/arch/Kconfig
index af14a567b493..94821e3f94d1 100644
--- a/arch/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/Kconfig
@@ -414,6 +414,13 @@ config MMU_GATHER_NO_GATHER
 	bool
 	depends on MMU_GATHER_TABLE_FREE
 
+config ARCH_WANT_IRQS_OFF_ACTIVATE_MM
+	bool
+	help
+	  Temporary select until all architectures can be converted to have
+	  irqs disabled over activate_mm. Architectures that do IPI based TLB
+	  shootdowns should enable this.
+
 config ARCH_HAVE_NMI_SAFE_CMPXCHG
 	bool
 
diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c
index a91003e28eaa..d4fb18baf1fb 100644
--- a/fs/exec.c
+++ b/fs/exec.c
@@ -1130,11 +1130,24 @@ static int exec_mmap(struct mm_struct *mm)
 	}
 
 	task_lock(tsk);
-	active_mm = tsk->active_mm;
 	membarrier_exec_mmap(mm);
-	tsk->mm = mm;
+
+	local_irq_disable();
+	active_mm = tsk->active_mm;
 	tsk->active_mm = mm;
+	tsk->mm = mm;
+	/*
+	 * This prevents preemption while active_mm is being loaded and
+	 * it and mm are being updated, which could cause problems for
+	 * lazy tlb mm refcounting when these are updated by context
+	 * switches. Not all architectures can handle irqs off over
+	 * activate_mm yet.
+	 */
+	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_IRQS_OFF_ACTIVATE_MM))
+		local_irq_enable();
 	activate_mm(active_mm, mm);
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_IRQS_OFF_ACTIVATE_MM))
+		local_irq_enable();
 	tsk->mm->vmacache_seqnum = 0;
 	vmacache_flush(tsk);
 	task_unlock(tsk);
-- 
2.23.0


  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-14  4:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-14  4:52 [PATCH v2 0/4] more mm switching vs TLB shootdown and lazy tlb fixes Nicholas Piggin
2020-09-14  4:52 ` Nicholas Piggin [this message]
2020-09-14 10:56   ` [PATCH v2 1/4] mm: fix exec activate_mm vs TLB shootdown and lazy tlb switching race peterz
2020-09-15  2:48     ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-09-15 11:26       ` Michael Ellerman
2020-09-18 12:18       ` Michael Ellerman
2020-09-14  4:52 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] powerpc: select ARCH_WANT_IRQS_OFF_ACTIVATE_MM Nicholas Piggin
2020-09-14  4:52 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] sparc64: remove mm_cpumask clearing to fix kthread_use_mm race Nicholas Piggin
2020-09-14  7:00   ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-09-14 10:23     ` Anatoly Pugachev
2020-09-15  2:49       ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-09-14 19:59   ` David Miller
2020-09-15  3:24     ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-09-15 19:42       ` David Miller
2020-09-14  4:52 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] powerpc/64s/radix: Fix mm_cpumask trimming race vs kthread_use_mm Nicholas Piggin
2020-09-24 12:28 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] more mm switching vs TLB shootdown and lazy tlb fixes Michael Ellerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200914045219.3736466-2-npiggin@gmail.com \
    --to=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).