From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40773C43464 for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2020 08:15:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D94D21481 for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2020 08:14:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=chromium.org header.i=@chromium.org header.b="jgNwfK9r" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 8D94D21481 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=chromium.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Btk5Y1s0HzDr1V for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2020 18:14:57 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=chromium.org (client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::642; helo=mail-pl1-x642.google.com; envelope-from=keescook@chromium.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=chromium.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=chromium.org header.i=@chromium.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=google header.b=jgNwfK9r; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail-pl1-x642.google.com (mail-pl1-x642.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::642]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BtjwC34pvzDqrm for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2020 18:06:51 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-pl1-x642.google.com with SMTP id bg9so4217244plb.2 for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2020 01:06:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=mrLryApnJ9OrHIHAcwmpSGY4TxWSaJUHtyhtfo3Txxc=; b=jgNwfK9rxr13QjIMA849prWXlVCgyfZx2+W0ylmX0aAIoJx1/qaNXA3wOcHdeOJlUp 2s3/qxs3FuB9H4lpwpHPrlrdp8/Q81BN9i8c12BTmQjY+cDMr1EtxTC2UPe4acoCa3T5 NgH4X89TkMDe7v6pAN1GmhBpZYl1R92hWMTxg= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=mrLryApnJ9OrHIHAcwmpSGY4TxWSaJUHtyhtfo3Txxc=; b=KXwoASEoj4bCsn3ijPC3nQ7eOwbQv80H+Yvfrt21Hif1IVAgCfOX22QiUbBSajkzuE RY7I4ybABH/0HyV/HPfWXv4U+YiiZvFP2uwlDwojsXZw6J5fr9lkNejk774BEruJvGmq JCpKUbeUAkAzVbn+FbrDZyJRunx+fR5lZo0qGk83q4U0lzoPcA1o8KBSq8GzMMdWy0Yx aRDHUpEKLzfNstUnHb865jGhORBA6X4mcZEI72gibz89W4SQJctGsrlA4igNDHL/gXdE 33IQsEyQECMd2u+/TPVNph2zr8kIhfKypFLhosaRRDBI0QBIzN78YNQC62l2/ecvLMk+ 5Kkw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530uiKowrdnvBXMU/HBOAkPFsxGk9J14foNYbSRECRo7ze11Qg1t UO/7YnqkKocQIzb64qM8u4RHIg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxzGPHSPF8+6O/bh2fwfZiDgn7d7ypRGUb1tocspyrduFRi0uPCbZiKy5aQ8tiKYFmJtWgo5A== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:9041:b029:d0:cc02:8540 with SMTP id w1-20020a1709029041b02900d0cc028540mr35396678plz.41.1600502809446; Sat, 19 Sep 2020 01:06:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from www.outflux.net (smtp.outflux.net. [198.145.64.163]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m5sm4824996pjn.19.2020.09.19.01.06.44 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 19 Sep 2020 01:06:45 -0700 (PDT) From: Kees Cook To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v2 1/4] selftests/seccomp: Record syscall during ptrace entry Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2020 01:06:34 -0700 Message-Id: <20200919080637.259478-2-keescook@chromium.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20200919080637.259478-1-keescook@chromium.org> References: <20200919080637.259478-1-keescook@chromium.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo , Will Drewry , Kees Cook , linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski , Max Filippov , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Christian Brauner Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" In preparation for performing actions during ptrace syscall exit, save the syscall number during ptrace syscall entry. Some architectures do no have the syscall number available during ptrace syscall exit. Suggested-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20200911181012.171027-1-cascardo@canonical.com/ Signed-off-by: Kees Cook --- tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c | 40 +++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c index bc0fb463c709..c0311b4c736b 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c @@ -1949,12 +1949,19 @@ void tracer_seccomp(struct __test_metadata *_metadata, pid_t tracee, } +FIXTURE(TRACE_syscall) { + struct sock_fprog prog; + pid_t tracer, mytid, mypid, parent; + long syscall_nr; +}; + void tracer_ptrace(struct __test_metadata *_metadata, pid_t tracee, int status, void *args) { - int ret, nr; + int ret; unsigned long msg; static bool entry; + FIXTURE_DATA(TRACE_syscall) *self = args; /* * The traditional way to tell PTRACE_SYSCALL entry/exit @@ -1968,24 +1975,31 @@ void tracer_ptrace(struct __test_metadata *_metadata, pid_t tracee, EXPECT_EQ(entry ? PTRACE_EVENTMSG_SYSCALL_ENTRY : PTRACE_EVENTMSG_SYSCALL_EXIT, msg); - if (!entry) + /* + * Some architectures only support setting return values during + * syscall exit under ptrace, and on exit the syscall number may + * no longer be available. Therefore, save the initial sycall + * number here, so it can be examined during both entry and exit + * phases. + */ + if (entry) + self->syscall_nr = get_syscall(_metadata, tracee); + else return; - nr = get_syscall(_metadata, tracee); - - if (nr == __NR_getpid) + switch (self->syscall_nr) { + case __NR_getpid: change_syscall(_metadata, tracee, __NR_getppid, 0); - if (nr == __NR_gettid) + break; + case __NR_gettid: change_syscall(_metadata, tracee, -1, 45000); - if (nr == __NR_openat) + break; + case __NR_openat: change_syscall(_metadata, tracee, -1, -ESRCH); + break; + } } -FIXTURE(TRACE_syscall) { - struct sock_fprog prog; - pid_t tracer, mytid, mypid, parent; -}; - FIXTURE_VARIANT(TRACE_syscall) { /* * All of the SECCOMP_RET_TRACE behaviors can be tested with either @@ -2044,7 +2058,7 @@ FIXTURE_SETUP(TRACE_syscall) self->tracer = setup_trace_fixture(_metadata, variant->use_ptrace ? tracer_ptrace : tracer_seccomp, - NULL, variant->use_ptrace); + self, variant->use_ptrace); ret = prctl(PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS, 1, 0, 0, 0); ASSERT_EQ(0, ret); -- 2.25.1