From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=wj8a=DA=lists.ozlabs.org=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 003CFC2D0A8
	for <linuxppc-dev@archiver.kernel.org>; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 13:25:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E500B21BE5
	for <linuxppc-dev@archiver.kernel.org>; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 13:25:26 +0000 (UTC)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org E500B21BE5
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=zeniv.linux.org.uk
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org
Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3])
	by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BxJnv4tZ7zDq7F
	for <linuxppc-dev@archiver.kernel.org>; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 23:25:23 +1000 (AEST)
Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record)
 smtp.mailfrom=ftp.linux.org.uk (client-ip=2002:c35c:fd02::1;
 helo=zeniv.linux.org.uk; envelope-from=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk;
 receiver=<UNKNOWN>)
Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none)
 header.from=zeniv.linux.org.uk
Received: from ZenIV.linux.org.uk (zeniv.linux.org.uk [IPv6:2002:c35c:fd02::1])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BxJlX2HQDzDqHZ
 for <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 23:23:16 +1000 (AEST)
Received: from viro by ZenIV.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat
 Linux)) id 1kL4jW-004YbY-CV; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 13:22:54 +0000
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 14:22:54 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] kernel: add a PF_FORCE_COMPAT flag
Message-ID: <20200923132254.GI3421308@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
References: <563138b5-7073-74bc-f0c5-b2bad6277e87@gmail.com>
 <486c92d0-0f2e-bd61-1ab8-302524af5e08@gmail.com>
 <CALCETrW3rwGsgfLNnu_0JAcL5jvrPVTLTWM3JpbB5P9Hye6Fdw@mail.gmail.com>
 <d5c6736a-2cb4-4e22-78da-a667bda5c05a@gmail.com>
 <CALCETrUEC81va8-fuUXG1uA5rbKxnKDYsDOXC70_HtKD4LAeAg@mail.gmail.com>
 <e0a1b4d1-ff47-18d1-d535-c62812cb3105@gmail.com>
 <CAK8P3a2-6JNS38EbZcLrk=cTT526oP=Rf0aoqWNSJ-k4XTYehQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <f25b4708-eba6-78d6-03f9-5bfb04e07627@gmail.com>
 <CAK8P3a39jN+t2hhLg0oKZnbYATQXmYE2-Z1JkmFyc1EPdg1HXw@mail.gmail.com>
 <91209170-dcb4-d9ee-afa0-a819f8877b86@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <91209170-dcb4-d9ee-afa0-a819f8877b86@gmail.com>
X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List <linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/options/linuxppc-dev>,
 <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
 <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: linux-aio <linux-aio@kvack.org>,
 "open list:MIPS" <linux-mips@vger.kernel.org>,
 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
 keyrings@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux <sparclinux@vger.kernel.org>,
 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
 linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
 Linux SCSI List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, linux-block <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
 Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, io-uring@vger.kernel.org,
 linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
 Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Parisc List <linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org>,
 Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
 LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
 LSM List <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
 Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
 linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org
Sender: "Linuxppc-dev"
 <linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org>

On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 11:01:34AM +0300, Pavel Begunkov wrote:

> > I'm not following why that would be considered a valid option,
> > as that clearly breaks existing users that update from a 32-bit
> > kernel to a 64-bit one.
> 
> Do you mean users who move 32-bit binaries (without recompiling) to a
> new x64 kernel? Does the kernel guarantees that to work?

Yes.

No further (printable) comments for now...