From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E0BEC388F9 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 14:41:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FF1B24171 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 14:41:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="PxugVsee" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 2FF1B24171 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CH96B1NBfzDqw4 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 01:41:22 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linuxfoundation.org (client-ip=198.145.29.99; helo=mail.kernel.org; envelope-from=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=PxugVsee; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CH94N2Q0PzDqnZ for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 01:39:47 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from localhost (83-86-74-64.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.74.64]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 276A224171; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 14:39:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1603377583; bh=ma7f6ciQXaB7O32bDDp+GeQJ6WrSJ5EDDu1VyaA7rGo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=PxugVsee9PWrXt/gXzudeuTvI47TjXebpNxq+V4HCmVCe1sKZHLosNqAbXuuvW+/i F3Omc7qJjCGcZpsoZ0gvdBLvvwF6P71x/p/bcwNCyzTjDInFt6yyFfEubOEEK8j98S eCVIVyZ2FmbbCU8ALan3OPjQJXwF2/c6hnwwd7rg= Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 16:40:21 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: Buggy commit tracked to: "Re: [PATCH 2/9] iov_iter: move rw_copy_check_uvector() into lib/iov_iter.c" Message-ID: <20201022144021.GA1969554@kroah.com> References: <5fd6003b-55a6-2c3c-9a28-8fd3a575ca78@redhat.com> <20201022104805.GA1503673@kroah.com> <20201022121849.GA1664412@kroah.com> <98d9df88-b7ef-fdfb-7d90-2fa7a9d7bab5@redhat.com> <20201022125759.GA1685526@kroah.com> <20201022135036.GA1787470@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "linux-aio@kvack.org" , David Hildenbrand , "linux-mips@vger.kernel.org" , David Howells , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "keyrings@vger.kernel.org" , "sparclinux@vger.kernel.org" , Christoph Hellwig , "linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-s390@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" , "kernel-team@android.com" , "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" , Al Viro , "io-uring@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Jens Axboe , "linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , Nick Desaulniers , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org" , David Laight , "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" , Andrew Morton , "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 04:28:20PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 3:50 PM Greg KH wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 02:57:59PM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 02:42:24PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote: > > > > > struct iovec *iovec_from_user(const struct iovec __user *uvec, > > > > - unsigned long nr_segs, unsigned long fast_segs, > > > > + unsigned nr_segs, unsigned fast_segs, > > > > struct iovec *fast_iov, bool compat) > > > > { > > > > struct iovec *iov = fast_iov; > > > > @@ -1738,7 +1738,7 @@ ssize_t __import_iovec(int type, const struct > > > > iovec __user *uvec, > > > > struct iov_iter *i, bool compat) > > > > { > > > > ssize_t total_len = 0; > > > > - unsigned long seg; > > > > + unsigned seg; > > > > struct iovec *iov; > > > > > > > > iov = iovec_from_user(uvec, nr_segs, fast_segs, *iovp, compat); > > > > > > > > > > Ah, I tested the other way around, making everything "unsigned long" > > > instead. Will go try this too, as other tests are still running... > > > > Ok, no, this didn't work either. > > > > Nick, I think I need some compiler help here. Any ideas? > > I don't think the patch above would reliably clear the upper bits if they > contain garbage. > > If the integer extension is the problem, the way I'd try it is to make the > function take an 'unsigned long' and then explictly mask the upper > bits with > > seg = lower_32_bits(seg); > > Can you attach the iov_iter.s files from the broken build, plus the > one with 'noinline' for comparison? Maybe something can be seen > in there. I don't know how to extract the .s files easily from the AOSP build system, I'll look into that. I'm also now testing by downgrading to an older version of clang (10 instead of 11), to see if that matters at all or not... thanks, greg k-h