From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 786DDC5DF9E for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 16:52:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 832EF20723 for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 16:52:45 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 832EF20723 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lst.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CLHnM6lQJzDqQy for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 03:52:39 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=lst.de (client-ip=213.95.11.211; helo=verein.lst.de; envelope-from=hch@lst.de; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lst.de Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CLHjK6XYZzDq8F for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 03:49:08 +1100 (AEDT) Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 5CA9967373; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 17:48:58 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 17:48:58 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Alexey Kardashevskiy Subject: Re: [PATCH kernel v2 1/2] dma: Allow mixing bypass and normal IOMMU operation Message-ID: <20201027164858.GA30651@lst.de> References: <20201027101841.96056-1-aik@ozlabs.ru> <20201027101841.96056-2-aik@ozlabs.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201027101841.96056-2-aik@ozlabs.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Christoph Hellwig , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" > +static inline bool dma_handle_direct(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t dma_handle) > +{ > + return dma_handle >= dev->archdata.dma_offset; > +} This won't compile except for powerpc, and directly accesing arch members in common code is a bad idea. Maybe both your helpers need to be supplied by arch code to better abstract this out. > if (dma_map_direct(dev, ops)) > addr = dma_direct_map_page(dev, page, offset, size, dir, attrs); > +#ifdef CONFIG_DMA_OPS_BYPASS_BUS_LIMIT > + else if (dev->bus_dma_limit && > + can_map_direct(dev, (phys_addr_t) page_to_phys(page) + offset + size)) > + addr = dma_direct_map_page(dev, page, offset, size, dir, attrs); > +#endif I don't think page_to_phys needs a phys_addr_t on the return value. I'd also much prefer if we make this a little more beautiful, here are a few suggestions: - hide the bus_dma_limit check inside can_map_direct, and provide a stub so that we can avoid the ifdef - use a better name for can_map_direct, and maybe also a better calling convention by passing the page (the sg code also has the page), and maybe even hide the dma_map_direct inside it. if (dma_map_direct(dev, ops) || arch_dma_map_page_direct(dev, page, offset, size)) addr = dma_direct_map_page(dev, page, offset, size, dir, attrs); > BUG_ON(!valid_dma_direction(dir)); > if (dma_map_direct(dev, ops)) > dma_direct_unmap_page(dev, addr, size, dir, attrs); > +#ifdef CONFIG_DMA_OPS_BYPASS_BUS_LIMIT > + else if (dev->bus_dma_limit && dma_handle_direct(dev, addr + size)) > + dma_direct_unmap_page(dev, addr, size, dir, attrs); > +#endif Same here. > if (dma_map_direct(dev, ops)) > ents = dma_direct_map_sg(dev, sg, nents, dir, attrs); > +#ifdef CONFIG_DMA_OPS_BYPASS_BUS_LIMIT > + else if (dev->bus_dma_limit) { > + struct scatterlist *s; > + bool direct = true; > + int i; > + > + for_each_sg(sg, s, nents, i) { > + direct = can_map_direct(dev, sg_phys(s) + s->offset + s->length); > + if (!direct) > + break; > + } > + if (direct) > + ents = dma_direct_map_sg(dev, sg, nents, dir, attrs); > + else > + ents = ops->map_sg(dev, sg, nents, dir, attrs); > + } > +#endif This needs to go into a helper as well. I think the same style as above would work pretty nicely as well: if (dma_map_direct(dev, ops) || arch_dma_map_sg_direct(dev, sg, nents)) ents = dma_direct_map_sg(dev, sg, nents, dir, attrs); else ents = ops->map_sg(dev, sg, nents, dir, attrs); > +#ifdef CONFIG_DMA_OPS_BYPASS_BUS_LIMIT > + if (dev->bus_dma_limit) { > + struct scatterlist *s; > + bool direct = true; > + int i; > + > + for_each_sg(sg, s, nents, i) { > + direct = dma_handle_direct(dev, s->dma_address + s->length); > + if (!direct) > + break; > + } > + if (direct) { > + dma_direct_unmap_sg(dev, sg, nents, dir, attrs); > + return; > + } > + } > +#endif One more time here..