From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DFA4C64E7C for ; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 11:30:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50E5320757 for ; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 11:30:22 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 50E5320757 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=alien8.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CmGwr29DGzDqZ3 for ; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 22:30:20 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=alien8.de (client-ip=2a01:4f8:190:11c2::b:1457; helo=mail.skyhub.de; envelope-from=bp@alien8.de; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=alien8.de Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=alien8.de header.i=@alien8.de header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=dkim header.b=HrvlMCQD; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail.skyhub.de (mail.skyhub.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:190:11c2::b:1457]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CmGqV5wqTzDqDQ for ; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 22:25:39 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from zn.tnic (p200300ec2f161b00e186258fb055049e.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2f16:1b00:e186:258f:b055:49e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id 5938E1EC04D6; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 12:25:19 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1606908319; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=auyM2v2JUyjcuzu7CPUf133Nl+wA9VC3RsABVwER50A=; b=HrvlMCQDSwyBJUvAUrSYUGvqLJKpRoJhr2fJO/O7GryF/KJ/kaNcQ+FZC0owkEvxlRx3ke PWcsKYyHABE1dZfvDA6gAKmgs66Y4gaTbr2LP93YxZSHb97QCsPFDwuwuu/4EBGmtIXH7d QS5VnEr+bP4cyAALPbsFlCfAJYQllXI= Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2020 12:25:15 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: Michael Ellerman , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras Subject: Re: [PATCH] EDAC, mv64x60: Fix error return code in mv64x60_pci_err_probe() Message-ID: <20201202112515.GC2951@zn.tnic> References: <20201124063009.1529-1-bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201124063009.1529-1-bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com> X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: cj.chengjian@huawei.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Wang ShaoBo , james.morse@arm.com, huawei.libin@huawei.com, mchehab@kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 02:30:09PM +0800, Wang ShaoBo wrote: > Fix to return -ENODEV error code when edac_pci_add_device() failed instaed > of 0 in mv64x60_pci_err_probe(), as done elsewhere in this function. > > Fixes: 4f4aeeabc061 ("drivers-edac: add marvell mv64x60 driver") > Signed-off-by: Wang ShaoBo > --- > drivers/edac/mv64x60_edac.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/edac/mv64x60_edac.c b/drivers/edac/mv64x60_edac.c > index 3c68bb525d5d..456b9ca1fe8d 100644 > --- a/drivers/edac/mv64x60_edac.c > +++ b/drivers/edac/mv64x60_edac.c > @@ -168,6 +168,7 @@ static int mv64x60_pci_err_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > if (edac_pci_add_device(pci, pdata->edac_idx) > 0) { > edac_dbg(3, "failed edac_pci_add_device()\n"); > + res = -ENODEV; > goto err; > } That driver depends on MV64X60 and I don't see anything in the tree enabling it and I can't select it AFAICT: config MV64X60 bool select PPC_INDIRECT_PCI select CHECK_CACHE_COHERENCY PPC folks, what do we do here? If not used anymore, I'd love to have one less EDAC driver. Thx. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette