From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B5CEC433FE for ; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 21:37:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1B1C22C7B for ; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 21:37:04 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B1B1C22C7B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Crr3d3qZfzDqvn for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 08:37:01 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org (client-ip=198.145.29.99; helo=mail.kernel.org; envelope-from=helgaas@kernel.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20201202 header.b=UhR87/9/; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Crr19689ZzDqp7 for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 08:34:53 +1100 (AEDT) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2020 15:34:49 -0600 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1607549691; bh=Ijxjlj4lL8UE+hp25kexw4TgoGCcQA02I64k1WeFKrw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:From; b=UhR87/9/SGHGsxnhTZM+hwkTVKtTVWVCfjhLkZ4gVTJ0V/BucF92vAzxs3XYqaVUh 9LnRCv7JNdM4tA5qqQt5+u3OEOJjxPxpNP0YUJs5gzX3zYEhOhii1vio+F9KwapVAT x95HYpilhT8X0umpXgc4tt1wIUwKq9+HcOrgwDk6Jh5sVGvPFmZiYgEvKXwzSzKZ0a /e+jlGom0maC7iFIY10cPdyyaq11fmQrsoDwGNR8cyvh+AibQ1nyGYfWmY48r0aD7X kjxCKedr/NRi11USZD0vCSzi5lGK/fizZ7Nlk/cvxSfRbpUqrJAFj9YdJxeAtLvHZ8 Qs3rcDwNBgc5Q== From: Bjorn Helgaas To: Vladimir Oltean Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] PCI: Unify ECAM constants in native PCI Express drivers Message-ID: <20201209213449.GA2546712@bjorn-Precision-5520> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201209212017.vx7dps3jasjcwg6j@skbuf> X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: kw@linux.com, heiko@sntech.de, shawn.lin@rock-chips.com, Alexandru Marginean , paulus@samba.org, thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com, jonnyc@amazon.com, toan@os.amperecomputing.com, will@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, michal.simek@xilinx.com, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, rjui@broadcom.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com, bhelgaas@google.com, jonathan.derrick@intel.com, sbranden@broadcom.com, wangzhou1@hisilicon.com, Michael Walle , rrichter@marvell.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, nsaenzjulienne@suse.de Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 11:20:17PM +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote: > On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 02:59:13PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > Yep, that's the theory. Thanks for testing it! > > Testing what? I'm not following. You posted a patch that you said fixed the bug for you. The fix is exactly the theory we've been discussing, so you have already verified that the theory is correct. I'm sure Krzysztof will update his patch, and we'll get this tidied up in -next again. Bjorn