From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB42AC433FE for ; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 21:46:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3236D23C44 for ; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 21:46:13 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 3236D23C44 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CrrGC70RpzDqvh for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 08:46:11 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com (client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::643; helo=mail-ej1-x643.google.com; envelope-from=olteanv@gmail.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20161025 header.b=dZmtXaLD; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail-ej1-x643.google.com (mail-ej1-x643.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::643]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CrrCr4BJxzDqcD for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 08:44:07 +1100 (AEDT) Received: by mail-ej1-x643.google.com with SMTP id jx16so4315670ejb.10 for ; Wed, 09 Dec 2020 13:44:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=TYfiACm4P9e4Q3UXzVvxYYSBgj6W7482KDX0U+gqWbs=; b=dZmtXaLDGCUswwrzjS8ONF2OhQRmKYjl1nzSnc3mmiJsqNbVqL3manL5sjzglo7CCY 1wc497+Sbhlix2kE2CrMvplc808zgbRKSC03CDIRVaXDRwMrqK+7SWFQDwil2NB2dPTg pDdUrg0oWsnoDkoNZpHgxWJgDl8njos5JD/PPNU/lEER943nhqRrpxItMT8/mKCOrlgb Oh/rLXbDyZJOr6qzKQ8ogKqLAKm540ml5BK9bltrYai3mshwQvG5mLxWAumPqnD8CKSz YtOSQPzHKU0JffPiybQFEFyydZIsbEvTbikLd3is5hvLpi4gEcLCpdGVPZCKuwOt5yl5 YnXg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=TYfiACm4P9e4Q3UXzVvxYYSBgj6W7482KDX0U+gqWbs=; b=PCoFqp8gddWGRhbG9Czd9F1ux8lyIQV6FuUyv/vZbf1bipf93OBI3BE7hyFjy/8FhX /+PDFhGF9WN4Pnps4gXax/1Bh+Y26AcFM32/rWFiR4pppmkJFvptl4oaoOHSs7MdAwWJ 873rdgVRRAVH1US5MlvjStkeUlZVGhieVueyJwc5d8L8U21NkrgRgGI360VOEIV9iH77 UJewtfFY2qfFuzN76WgtMFtI2jpfTBv9IEZX9dhcqRgn7BuJExmLhO8pHcbSJDrTOYOn o5BZdAsF78GsApkAQwJVHTLS7MOhnwMo0QDZXga8LwEF+HfRWMY4+gn/fk+W89Hwl+FR nvAw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532hIx2XqR8jeS5b/D5DrtrksskBwONItaxIhaUfTHsOJvjWRucl cISOI/daTEeYPGfpXozGSvY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw8Oidd7MiYim2KDHlebjhNwIYc6G5UNWFqv7rjerwne/emDzLWDDd6gsqRcg/RCqRAXT5FGQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:4994:: with SMTP id p20mr3748565eju.391.1607550242169; Wed, 09 Dec 2020 13:44:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from skbuf ([188.25.2.120]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id lc18sm2600554ejb.77.2020.12.09.13.43.59 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 09 Dec 2020 13:44:01 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2020 23:43:59 +0200 From: Vladimir Oltean To: Bjorn Helgaas Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] PCI: Unify ECAM constants in native PCI Express drivers Message-ID: <20201209214359.gt4wisqh65oscd4i@skbuf> References: <20201209212017.vx7dps3jasjcwg6j@skbuf> <20201209213449.GA2546712@bjorn-Precision-5520> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201209213449.GA2546712@bjorn-Precision-5520> X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: kw@linux.com, heiko@sntech.de, shawn.lin@rock-chips.com, Alexandru Marginean , paulus@samba.org, thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com, jonnyc@amazon.com, toan@os.amperecomputing.com, will@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, michal.simek@xilinx.com, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, rjui@broadcom.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com, bhelgaas@google.com, jonathan.derrick@intel.com, sbranden@broadcom.com, wangzhou1@hisilicon.com, Michael Walle , rrichter@marvell.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, nsaenzjulienne@suse.de Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 03:34:49PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 11:20:17PM +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 02:59:13PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > > Yep, that's the theory. Thanks for testing it! > > > > Testing what? I'm not following. > > You posted a patch that you said fixed the bug for you. The fix is > exactly the theory we've been discussing, so you have already verified > that the theory is correct. > > I'm sure Krzysztof will update his patch, and we'll get this tidied up > in -next again. If you were discussing this already, I missed it. I was copied to this thread out of the blue two emails ago. I also looked at the full thread on patchwork, I don't see anything being said about the culprit being the size of the config space mapping.