From: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com>
To: mpe@ellerman.id.au, paulus@samba.org
Cc: christophe.leroy@c-s.fr, ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com,
mikey@neuling.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, leobras.c@gmail.com,
jniethe5@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
npiggin@gmail.com, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/4] KVM: PPC: Allow nested guest creation when L0 hv_guest_state > L1
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 16:12:16 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201216104219.458713-2-ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201216104219.458713-1-ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com>
On powerpc, L1 hypervisor takes help of L0 using H_ENTER_NESTED
hcall to load L2 guest state in cpu. L1 hypervisor prepares the
L2 state in struct hv_guest_state and passes a pointer to it via
hcall. Using that pointer, L0 reads/writes that state directly
from/to L1 memory. Thus L0 must be aware of hv_guest_state layout
of L1. Currently it uses version field to achieve this. i.e. If
L0 hv_guest_state.version != L1 hv_guest_state.version, L0 won't
allow nested kvm guest.
This restriction can be loosen up a bit. L0 can be taught to
understand older layout of hv_guest_state, if we restrict the
new member to be added only at the end. i.e. we can allow
nested guest even when L0 hv_guest_state.version > L1
hv_guest_state.version. Though, the other way around is not
possible.
Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/hvcall.h | 17 +++++++--
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_nested.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++------
2 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hvcall.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hvcall.h
index c1fbccb04390..ca6840239f90 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hvcall.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hvcall.h
@@ -526,9 +526,12 @@ struct h_cpu_char_result {
u64 behaviour;
};
-/* Register state for entering a nested guest with H_ENTER_NESTED */
+/*
+ * Register state for entering a nested guest with H_ENTER_NESTED.
+ * New member must be added at the end.
+ */
struct hv_guest_state {
- u64 version; /* version of this structure layout */
+ u64 version; /* version of this structure layout, must be first */
u32 lpid;
u32 vcpu_token;
/* These registers are hypervisor privileged (at least for writing) */
@@ -562,6 +565,16 @@ struct hv_guest_state {
/* Latest version of hv_guest_state structure */
#define HV_GUEST_STATE_VERSION 1
+static inline int hv_guest_state_size(unsigned int version)
+{
+ switch (version) {
+ case 1:
+ return offsetofend(struct hv_guest_state, ppr);
+ default:
+ return -1;
+ }
+}
+
/*
* From the document "H_GetPerformanceCounterInfo Interface" v1.07
*
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_nested.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_nested.c
index 33b58549a9aa..937dd5114300 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_nested.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_nested.c
@@ -215,12 +215,51 @@ static void kvmhv_nested_mmio_needed(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 regs_ptr)
}
}
+static int kvmhv_read_guest_state_and_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+ struct hv_guest_state *l2_hv,
+ struct pt_regs *l2_regs,
+ u64 hv_ptr, u64 regs_ptr)
+{
+ int size;
+
+ if (kvm_vcpu_read_guest(vcpu, hv_ptr, &l2_hv->version,
+ sizeof(l2_hv->version)))
+ return -1;
+
+ if (kvmppc_need_byteswap(vcpu))
+ l2_hv->version = swab64(l2_hv->version);
+
+ size = hv_guest_state_size(l2_hv->version);
+ if (size < 0)
+ return -1;
+
+ return kvm_vcpu_read_guest(vcpu, hv_ptr, l2_hv, size) ||
+ kvm_vcpu_read_guest(vcpu, regs_ptr, l2_regs,
+ sizeof(struct pt_regs));
+}
+
+static int kvmhv_write_guest_state_and_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+ struct hv_guest_state *l2_hv,
+ struct pt_regs *l2_regs,
+ u64 hv_ptr, u64 regs_ptr)
+{
+ int size;
+
+ size = hv_guest_state_size(l2_hv->version);
+ if (size < 0)
+ return -1;
+
+ return kvm_vcpu_write_guest(vcpu, hv_ptr, l2_hv, size) ||
+ kvm_vcpu_write_guest(vcpu, regs_ptr, l2_regs,
+ sizeof(struct pt_regs));
+}
+
long kvmhv_enter_nested_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
long int err, r;
struct kvm_nested_guest *l2;
struct pt_regs l2_regs, saved_l1_regs;
- struct hv_guest_state l2_hv, saved_l1_hv;
+ struct hv_guest_state l2_hv = {0}, saved_l1_hv;
struct kvmppc_vcore *vc = vcpu->arch.vcore;
u64 hv_ptr, regs_ptr;
u64 hdec_exp;
@@ -235,17 +274,15 @@ long kvmhv_enter_nested_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
hv_ptr = kvmppc_get_gpr(vcpu, 4);
regs_ptr = kvmppc_get_gpr(vcpu, 5);
vcpu->srcu_idx = srcu_read_lock(&vcpu->kvm->srcu);
- err = kvm_vcpu_read_guest(vcpu, hv_ptr, &l2_hv,
- sizeof(struct hv_guest_state)) ||
- kvm_vcpu_read_guest(vcpu, regs_ptr, &l2_regs,
- sizeof(struct pt_regs));
+ err = kvmhv_read_guest_state_and_regs(vcpu, &l2_hv, &l2_regs,
+ hv_ptr, regs_ptr);
srcu_read_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->srcu, vcpu->srcu_idx);
if (err)
return H_PARAMETER;
if (kvmppc_need_byteswap(vcpu))
byteswap_hv_regs(&l2_hv);
- if (l2_hv.version != HV_GUEST_STATE_VERSION)
+ if (l2_hv.version > HV_GUEST_STATE_VERSION)
return H_P2;
if (kvmppc_need_byteswap(vcpu))
@@ -325,10 +362,8 @@ long kvmhv_enter_nested_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
byteswap_pt_regs(&l2_regs);
}
vcpu->srcu_idx = srcu_read_lock(&vcpu->kvm->srcu);
- err = kvm_vcpu_write_guest(vcpu, hv_ptr, &l2_hv,
- sizeof(struct hv_guest_state)) ||
- kvm_vcpu_write_guest(vcpu, regs_ptr, &l2_regs,
- sizeof(struct pt_regs));
+ err = kvmhv_write_guest_state_and_regs(vcpu, &l2_hv, &l2_regs,
+ hv_ptr, regs_ptr);
srcu_read_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->srcu, vcpu->srcu_idx);
if (err)
return H_AUTHORITY;
--
2.26.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-16 11:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-16 10:42 [PATCH v3 0/4] KVM: PPC: Power10 2nd DAWR enablement Ravi Bangoria
2020-12-16 10:42 ` Ravi Bangoria [this message]
2020-12-16 10:42 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] KVM: PPC: Rename current DAWR macros and variables Ravi Bangoria
2020-12-16 10:42 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] KVM: PPC: Add infrastructure to support 2nd DAWR Ravi Bangoria
2020-12-16 10:42 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] KVM: PPC: Introduce new capability for " Ravi Bangoria
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201216104219.458713-2-ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com \
--to=ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=christophe.leroy@c-s.fr \
--cc=jniethe5@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=leobras.c@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mikey@neuling.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).