From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52D64C4361B for ; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 14:59:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4CC723AFD for ; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 14:59:15 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org C4CC723AFD Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=metux.net Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CyBpT291CzDr0Q for ; Sat, 19 Dec 2020 01:59:13 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=metux.net (client-ip=212.227.126.131; helo=mout.kundenserver.de; envelope-from=info@metux.net; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=metux.net Received: from mout.kundenserver.de (mout.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.131]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CyBH54f2TzDqYV for ; Sat, 19 Dec 2020 01:35:29 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from orion.localdomain ([95.115.54.243]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue009 [212.227.15.167]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MplPh-1kIFED0xaP-00qCoo; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 15:32:00 +0100 From: "Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 10/23] arch: sh: drop misleading warning on spurious IRQ Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 15:31:09 +0100 Message-Id: <20201218143122.19459-11-info@metux.net> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.11.0 In-Reply-To: <20201218143122.19459-1-info@metux.net> References: <20201218143122.19459-1-info@metux.net> X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:6TL4KPw+Ks7RU+AOsNXR+Ltfqz8XJW1b6vQsJcdupkFn/HGWZEu Pxb0W8VDuSp/eowGr2QZ2YYTQOeQIZ9sqLBhLlV4U0gn+9wxn0ZUCYDi1tihD8RSGfUeK0C FGo4l2UrGrTty9YtCH6eYRewFkVOo2b5I9IK1HudQLPzVrlY+lg/sg4fjnmPhPdkFl0hPAj +B/DBmIm2JthV5pOD9Lkg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:UEl1mf8Ej6U=:vVuWyafI8JwPT8IqekTwUf kJjVjnagJeZHcYrcEXI6WwIlGSzMR+6bJyDiDgrQgM7iWZQNxupfE9+KZ4CH8xwAl9bz0An2S g9SX/sJHYF9btvrHzN98Mv01lN2WXq/JdCqiiTmep8ayCtPYeqZm1MWA+VpMPBqXCiySp4nKx YrriRyCaFlryZz82ICVCzrhapzFYKL90MwPaC/6LLngk9MDuAZXPEeA0CD9w5aVk5j4WXyXy5 moMvzvbBtoDNV/k1qA+tVeoczyKN9TMEwdpIVorDrHaUiPErxH0/+N3nGQGgxmN6gMk3qWGdm EQ926JDJncMRW18rLb97838aejHl2X+vn6odNyiZ81k15fjExFGn5Wsknjg4EIF4+ChUIckPq +B2MnXPkaLoMWdjQowJZMdiHVoEkc5t1KkUtVQLM/6nWRTJu4GUgNhKYVSNhR X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, dalias@libc.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, linus.walleij@linaro.org, James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com, paulus@samba.org, hpa@zytor.com, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, will@kernel.org, gerg@linux-m68k.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org, ysato@users.sourceforge.jp, jolsa@redhat.com, deller@gmx.de, x86@kernel.org, bgolaszewski@baylibre.com, tony@atomide.com, geert@linux-m68k.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, msalter@redhat.com, jacquiot.aurelien@gmail.com, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, bp@alien8.de, namhyung@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, tsbogend@alpha.franken.de, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, maz@kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, davem@davemloft.net Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" The warning in ack_bad_irq() is misleading in several ways: * the term "vector" isn't quite correct * the printing format isn't consistent across the archs: some print decimal, some hex, some hex w/o 0x prefix. * the printed linux irq isn't meaningful in all cases - we actually would want it to print the hw irq. Since all call sites already print out more detailed and correct information, we just don't need to duplicate this in each single arch. So just drop it. Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult --- arch/sh/kernel/irq.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/sh/kernel/irq.c b/arch/sh/kernel/irq.c index ab5f790b0cd2..c14a142efe60 100644 --- a/arch/sh/kernel/irq.c +++ b/arch/sh/kernel/irq.c @@ -31,7 +31,6 @@ atomic_t irq_err_count; void ack_bad_irq(unsigned int irq) { atomic_inc(&irq_err_count); - printk("unexpected IRQ trap at vector %02x\n", irq); } #if defined(CONFIG_PROC_FS) -- 2.11.0