linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nathan Lynch <nathanl@linux.ibm.com>
To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: tyreld@linux.ibm.com, ajd@linux.ibm.com, aik@ozlabs.ru,
	aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com, brking@linux.ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH 0/6] powerpc/rtas: miscellaneous cleanups, user region allocation
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 15:59:58 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210114220004.1138993-1-nathanl@linux.ibm.com> (raw)

The region exposed to user space for use as work areas passed to
sys_rtas() can be incorrectly allocated on radix, leading to failures
in users of librtas. Correct this and clean up some of the code
visited along the way.

I think the cleanups should be unobjectionable and I've placed them
first in the series. Please check my work on the rtas_rmo_buf
allocation changes; they are only lightly tested so far (slot add on
Power9 PowerVM, and comparison of /memory@0/reg with the contents of
/proc/powerpc/rtas/rmo_buf on qemu Power9 w/radix).

I suspect the per-cpu RTAS argument structures for reentrant calls
need similar measures, but I can add that to the series once there is
consensus on the approach.

Nathan Lynch (6):
  powerpc/rtas: improve ppc_rtas_rmo_buf_show documentation
  powerpc/rtas-proc: remove unused RMO_READ_BUF_MAX
  powerpc/rtas: remove ibm_suspend_me_token
  powerpc/rtas: move syscall filter setup into separate function
  powerpc/rtas: rename RTAS_RMOBUF_MAX to RTAS_USER_REGION_SIZE
  powerpc/rtas: constrain user region allocation to RMA

 arch/powerpc/include/asm/rtas.h |   9 ++-
 arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas-proc.c |  15 +++--
 arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c      | 108 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 3 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)

-- 
2.29.2


             reply	other threads:[~2021-01-14 22:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-14 21:59 Nathan Lynch [this message]
2021-01-14 21:59 ` [PATCH 1/6] powerpc/rtas: improve ppc_rtas_rmo_buf_show documentation Nathan Lynch
2021-01-15  4:38   ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2021-01-15  5:50   ` Andrew Donnellan
2021-01-14 22:00 ` [PATCH 2/6] powerpc/rtas-proc: remove unused RMO_READ_BUF_MAX Nathan Lynch
2021-01-15  4:38   ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2021-01-15  5:52   ` Andrew Donnellan
2021-01-14 22:00 ` [PATCH 3/6] powerpc/rtas: remove ibm_suspend_me_token Nathan Lynch
2021-01-15  4:38   ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2021-01-15  5:52   ` Andrew Donnellan
2021-01-14 22:00 ` [PATCH 4/6] powerpc/rtas: move syscall filter setup into separate function Nathan Lynch
2021-01-15  4:39   ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2021-01-15 16:04     ` Nathan Lynch
2021-01-15  5:49   ` Andrew Donnellan
2021-01-14 22:00 ` [PATCH 5/6] powerpc/rtas: rename RTAS_RMOBUF_MAX to RTAS_USER_REGION_SIZE Nathan Lynch
2021-01-15  4:38   ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2021-01-15 15:56     ` Nathan Lynch
2021-01-18  4:15       ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2021-01-20  1:17         ` Nathan Lynch
2021-01-20  5:05           ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2021-01-21 15:17             ` Nathan Lynch
2021-01-15  6:10   ` Andrew Donnellan
2021-01-15 12:04   ` kernel test robot
2021-01-14 22:00 ` [PATCH 6/6] powerpc/rtas: constrain user region allocation to RMA Nathan Lynch
2021-01-15  4:38   ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2021-01-15 15:38     ` Nathan Lynch
2021-01-18  4:12       ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2021-01-20  0:39         ` Nathan Lynch
2021-01-20  4:49           ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2021-01-20 12:06           ` Michael Ellerman
2021-01-21 15:27             ` Nathan Lynch
2021-01-23  1:54               ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2021-01-19  9:00   ` Michael Ellerman
2021-01-19 21:00     ` Nathan Lynch
2021-01-20 12:13       ` Michael Ellerman
2021-01-21  0:26         ` Nathan Lynch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210114220004.1138993-1-nathanl@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=nathanl@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=aik@ozlabs.ru \
    --cc=ajd@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=brking@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=tyreld@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).