From: Lijun Pan <ljp@linux.ibm.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Lijun Pan" <ljp@linux.ibm.com>,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, julietk@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
paulus@samba.org, kernel@pengutronix.de, drt@linux.ibm.com,
kuba@kernel.org, sukadev@linux.ibm.com,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, davem@davemloft.net
Subject: [PATCH net] ibmvnic: device remove has higher precedence over reset
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2021 00:20:05 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210121062005.53271-1-ljp@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
Returning -EBUSY in ibmvnic_remove() does not actually hold the
removal procedure since driver core doesn't care for the return
value (see __device_release_driver() in drivers/base/dd.c
calling dev->bus->remove()) though vio_bus_remove
(in arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/vio.c) records the
return value and passes it on. [1]
During the device removal precedure, we should not schedule
any new reset (ibmvnic_reset check for REMOVING and exit),
and should rely on the flush_work and flush_delayed_work
to complete the pending resets, specifically we need to
let __ibmvnic_reset() keep running while in REMOVING state since
flush_work and flush_delayed_work shall call __ibmvnic_reset finally.
So we skip the checking for REMOVING in __ibmvnic_reset.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/20210117101242.dpwayq6wdgfdzirl@pengutronix.de/T/#m48f5befd96bc9842ece2a3ad14f4c27747206a53
Reported-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Fixes: 7d7195a026ba ("ibmvnic: Do not process device remove during device reset")
Signed-off-by: Lijun Pan <ljp@linux.ibm.com>
---
v1 versus RFC:
1/ articulate why remove the REMOVING checking in __ibmvnic_reset
and why keep the current checking for REMOVING in ibmvnic_reset.
2/ The locking issue mentioned by Uwe are being addressed separately
by https://lists.openwall.net/netdev/2021/01/08/89
3/ This patch does not have merge conflict with 2/
drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c | 8 +-------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c
index aed985e08e8a..11f28fd03057 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c
@@ -2235,8 +2235,7 @@ static void __ibmvnic_reset(struct work_struct *work)
while (rwi) {
spin_lock_irqsave(&adapter->state_lock, flags);
- if (adapter->state == VNIC_REMOVING ||
- adapter->state == VNIC_REMOVED) {
+ if (adapter->state == VNIC_REMOVED) {
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&adapter->state_lock, flags);
kfree(rwi);
rc = EBUSY;
@@ -5372,11 +5371,6 @@ static int ibmvnic_remove(struct vio_dev *dev)
unsigned long flags;
spin_lock_irqsave(&adapter->state_lock, flags);
- if (test_bit(0, &adapter->resetting)) {
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&adapter->state_lock, flags);
- return -EBUSY;
- }
-
adapter->state = VNIC_REMOVING;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&adapter->state_lock, flags);
--
2.22.0
next reply other threads:[~2021-01-21 6:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-21 6:20 Lijun Pan [this message]
2021-01-21 18:24 ` [PATCH net] ibmvnic: device remove has higher precedence over reset Dany Madden
2021-01-21 18:46 ` Lijun Pan
2021-01-21 19:48 ` Lijun Pan
2021-01-21 22:38 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210121062005.53271-1-ljp@linux.ibm.com \
--to=ljp@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=drt@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=julietk@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=sukadev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).