From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Libor Pechacek <lpechacek@suse.com>
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 09/12] selftests/powerpc: Only test lwm/stmw on big endian
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 10:38:28 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210129153831.1592769-9-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210129153831.1592769-1-sashal@kernel.org>
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
[ Upstream commit dd3a44c06f7b4f14e90065bf05d62c255b20005f ]
Newer binutils (>= 2.36) refuse to assemble lmw/stmw when building in
little endian mode. That breaks compilation of our alignment handler
test:
/tmp/cco4l14N.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp/cco4l14N.s:1440: Error: `lmw' invalid when little-endian
/tmp/cco4l14N.s:1814: Error: `stmw' invalid when little-endian
make[2]: *** [../../lib.mk:139: /output/kselftest/powerpc/alignment/alignment_handler] Error 1
These tests do pass on little endian machines, as the kernel will
still emulate those instructions even when running little
endian (which is arguably a kernel bug).
But we don't really need to test that case, so ifdef those
instructions out to get the alignment test building again.
Reported-by: Libor Pechacek <lpechacek@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Tested-by: Libor Pechacek <lpechacek@suse.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210119041800.3093047-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
.../testing/selftests/powerpc/alignment/alignment_handler.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/alignment/alignment_handler.c b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/alignment/alignment_handler.c
index 169a8b9719fb9..4f8335e0c9858 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/alignment/alignment_handler.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/alignment/alignment_handler.c
@@ -384,7 +384,6 @@ int test_alignment_handler_integer(void)
LOAD_DFORM_TEST(ldu);
LOAD_XFORM_TEST(ldx);
LOAD_XFORM_TEST(ldux);
- LOAD_DFORM_TEST(lmw);
STORE_DFORM_TEST(stb);
STORE_XFORM_TEST(stbx);
STORE_DFORM_TEST(stbu);
@@ -403,7 +402,11 @@ int test_alignment_handler_integer(void)
STORE_XFORM_TEST(stdx);
STORE_DFORM_TEST(stdu);
STORE_XFORM_TEST(stdux);
+
+#ifdef __BIG_ENDIAN__
+ LOAD_DFORM_TEST(lmw);
STORE_DFORM_TEST(stmw);
+#endif
return rc;
}
--
2.27.0
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-29 15:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20210129153831.1592769-1-sashal@kernel.org>
2021-01-29 15:38 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 08/12] scsi: ibmvfc: Set default timeout to avoid crash during migration Sasha Levin
2021-01-29 15:38 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210129153831.1592769-9-sashal@kernel.org \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=lpechacek@suse.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).