From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42F36C433DB for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 03:29:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C67F564DB1 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 03:29:19 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org C67F564DB1 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ozlabs.ru Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Dfmfk1dwGz3cHT for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 14:29:18 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=ozlabs.ru (client-ip=107.174.27.60; helo=ozlabs.ru; envelope-from=aik@ozlabs.ru; receiver=) X-Greylist: delayed 524 seconds by postgrey-1.36 at boromir; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 14:28:58 AEDT Received: from ozlabs.ru (ozlabs.ru [107.174.27.60]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DfmfL6rSfz30Gs for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 14:28:57 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from fstn1-p1.ozlabs.ibm.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ozlabs.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84C9FAE8020D; Mon, 15 Feb 2021 22:20:04 -0500 (EST) From: Alexey Kardashevskiy To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: [PATCH kernel] powerpc/iommu: Annotate nested lock for lockdep Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 14:20:00 +1100 Message-Id: <20210216032000.21642-1-aik@ozlabs.ru> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Alexey Kardashevskiy , kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" The IOMMU table is divided into pools for concurrent mappings and each pool has a separate spinlock. When taking the ownership of an IOMMU group to pass through a device to a VM, we lock these spinlocks which triggers a false negative warning in lockdep (below). This fixes it by annotating the large pool's spinlock as a nest lock. === WARNING: possible recursive locking detected 5.11.0-le_syzkaller_a+fstn1 #100 Not tainted -------------------------------------------- qemu-system-ppc/4129 is trying to acquire lock: c0000000119bddb0 (&(p->lock)/1){....}-{2:2}, at: iommu_take_ownership+0xac/0x1e0 but task is already holding lock: c0000000119bdd30 (&(p->lock)/1){....}-{2:2}, at: iommu_take_ownership+0xac/0x1e0 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(&(p->lock)/1); lock(&(p->lock)/1); === Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy --- arch/powerpc/kernel/iommu.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/iommu.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/iommu.c index 557a09dd5b2f..2ee642a6731a 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/iommu.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/iommu.c @@ -1089,7 +1089,7 @@ int iommu_take_ownership(struct iommu_table *tbl) spin_lock_irqsave(&tbl->large_pool.lock, flags); for (i = 0; i < tbl->nr_pools; i++) - spin_lock(&tbl->pools[i].lock); + spin_lock_nest_lock(&tbl->pools[i].lock, &tbl->large_pool.lock); iommu_table_release_pages(tbl); -- 2.17.1