From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEF07C433E0 for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 21:45:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1EAB564F2A for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 21:45:00 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 1EAB564F2A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DmmXp5ZfZz3dWH for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 08:44:58 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=UjrtBpo0; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=tyreld@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=UjrtBpo0; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DmmVH696Gz3clj for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 08:42:47 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098409.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 11PLY8XY090122; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 16:42:45 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=aKcJolVr+gZGAJ6hZ9FRIBjsOoHYSXVjQH1jRz8u/ak=; b=UjrtBpo0Mdek0M67K37AIAGRwtN1hgF2q4Cj8fwdWbLvZXWeFdwbw3hPFPZYQ2CQ2rM8 QtOcSz5qHAN/gEYbmLN5A9+F4SljjUjx4ccMdVZ6vkkp2WmYRFXMWhii5M6Ei+f5s+kR 90xktp2h011rQ4J7klE5xJWeUWj6dnPXPV7NsTDZ8DcIEDeEwqN87r9j5bAd0M9vfD02 lZBD/8AQTx4qMBm3my1nSp22tEU9Xfvd8L0g5+35RTTmM/pmvCGxCswjmpNM7mXRewgc FeLfR8t4zCFQ5Pg7sdrAkaFcsIPLdHYz8CtH32F5m78So8u/86DLK7cpyWLrPz6/YXYc 8w== Received: from ppma03dal.us.ibm.com (b.bd.3ea9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.62.189.11]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 36xh8jvxhs-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 25 Feb 2021 16:42:44 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma03dal.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma03dal.us.ibm.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 11PLS0l8018596; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 21:42:44 GMT Received: from b03cxnp08026.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03cxnp08026.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.18]) by ppma03dal.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 36v5y9mryf-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 25 Feb 2021 21:42:43 +0000 Received: from b03ledav004.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03ledav004.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.235]) by b03cxnp08026.gho.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 11PLggFA28836288 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 25 Feb 2021 21:42:42 GMT Received: from b03ledav004.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1FF37805E; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 21:42:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b03ledav004.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 736947805C; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 21:42:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from vios4361.aus.stglabs.ibm.com (unknown [9.3.43.61]) by b03ledav004.gho.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 21:42:41 +0000 (GMT) From: Tyrel Datwyler To: james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com Subject: [PATCH v3 4/5] ibmvfc: store return code of H_FREE_SUB_CRQ during cleanup Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 15:42:36 -0600 Message-Id: <20210225214237.22400-5-tyreld@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 In-Reply-To: <20210225214237.22400-1-tyreld@linux.ibm.com> References: <20210225214237.22400-1-tyreld@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.369, 18.0.761 definitions=2021-02-25_14:2021-02-24, 2021-02-25 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 suspectscore=0 bulkscore=0 clxscore=1015 phishscore=0 malwarescore=0 priorityscore=1501 adultscore=0 impostorscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2102250163 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Tyrel Datwyler , martin.petersen@oracle.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, brking@linux.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" The H_FREE_SUB_CRQ hypercall can return a retry delay return code that indicates the call needs to be retried after a specific amount of time delay. The error path to free a sub-CRQ in case of a failure during channel registration fails to capture the return code of H_FREE_SUB_CRQ which will result in the delay loop being skipped in the case of a retry delay return code. Store the return code result of the H_FREE_SUB_CRQ call such that the return code check in the delay loop evaluates a meaningful value. Also, use the rtas_busy_delay() to check the rc value and delay for the appropriate amount of time. Fixes: 9288d35d70b5 ("ibmvfc: map/request irq and register Sub-CRQ interrupt handler") Signed-off-by: Tyrel Datwyler Reviewed-by: Brian King --- drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c index 274c5a1fac9c..1bb08e5f3674 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include #include @@ -5670,8 +5671,8 @@ static int ibmvfc_register_scsi_channel(struct ibmvfc_host *vhost, irq_failed: do { - plpar_hcall_norets(H_FREE_SUB_CRQ, vdev->unit_address, scrq->cookie); - } while (rc == H_BUSY || H_IS_LONG_BUSY(rc)); + rc = plpar_hcall_norets(H_FREE_SUB_CRQ, vdev->unit_address, scrq->cookie); + } while (rtas_busy_delay(rc)); reg_failed: ibmvfc_free_queue(vhost, scrq); LEAVE; -- 2.27.0