LinuxPPC-Dev Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: oleg@redhat.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paulus@samba.org,
	sandipan@linux.ibm.com, jniethe5@gmail.com,
	naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] powerpc/uprobes: Validation for prefixed instruction
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2021 14:08:36 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210303083836.GD1913@DESKTOP-TDPLP67.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210304050529.59391-1-ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com>

On 2021/03/04 10:35AM, Ravi Bangoria wrote:
> As per ISA 3.1, prefixed instruction should not cross 64-byte
> boundary. So don't allow Uprobe on such prefixed instruction.
> 
> There are two ways probed instruction is changed in mapped pages.
> First, when Uprobe is activated, it searches for all the relevant
> pages and replace instruction in them. In this case, if that probe
> is on the 64-byte unaligned prefixed instruction, error out
> directly. Second, when Uprobe is already active and user maps a
> relevant page via mmap(), instruction is replaced via mmap() code
> path. But because Uprobe is invalid, entire mmap() operation can
> not be stopped. In this case just print an error and continue.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210204104703.273429-1-ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com
> v2->v3:
>   - Drop restriction for Uprobe on suffix of prefixed instruction.
>     It needs lot of code change including generic code but what
>     we get in return is not worth it.
> 
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/uprobes.c | 8 ++++++++
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/uprobes.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/uprobes.c
> index e8a63713e655..c400971ebe70 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/uprobes.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/uprobes.c
> @@ -41,6 +41,14 @@ int arch_uprobe_analyze_insn(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe,
>  	if (addr & 0x03)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> +	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC64) || !cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31))
> +		return 0;

Sorry, I missed this last time, but I think we can drop the above 
checks. ppc_inst_prefixed() already factors in the dependency on 
CONFIG_PPC64, and I don't think we need to confirm if we're running on a 
ISA V3.1 for the below check.

With that:
Acked-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

> +
> +	if (ppc_inst_prefixed(auprobe->insn) && (addr & 0x3F) == 0x3C) {
> +		pr_info_ratelimited("Cannot register a uprobe on 64 byte unaligned prefixed instruction\n");
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +

- Naveen

  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-04  5:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-04  5:05 [PATCH v3] powerpc/uprobes: Validation for prefixed instruction Ravi Bangoria
2021-03-03  8:38 ` Naveen N. Rao [this message]
2021-03-04  7:39   ` Ravi Bangoria
2021-03-04  7:32 ` Christophe Leroy
2021-03-04 10:13   ` Ravi Bangoria
2021-03-04 10:51     ` Christophe Leroy
2021-03-04 11:02       ` Ravi Bangoria

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210303083836.GD1913@DESKTOP-TDPLP67.localdomain \
    --to=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=jniethe5@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sandipan@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox