From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
'Rasmus Villemoes' <rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/vdso32: Add missing _restgpr_31_x to fix build failure
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2021 18:59:47 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210315235947.GD16691@gate.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <14e2cfb8c3f141aaba8fe0fb2d8f1885@AcuMS.aculab.com>
On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 04:38:52PM +0000, David Laight wrote:
> From: Rasmus Villemoes
> > Sent: 15 March 2021 16:24
> > On 12/03/2021 03.29, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 06:19:30AM +0000, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> > >> With some defconfig including CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE,
> > >> (for instance mvme5100_defconfig and ps3_defconfig), gcc 5
> > >> generates a call to _restgpr_31_x.
> > >
> > >> I don't know if there is a way to tell GCC not to emit that call, because at the end we get more
> > instructions than needed.
> > >
> > > The function is required by the ABI, you need to have it.
> > >
> > > You get *fewer* insns statically, and that is what -Os is about: reduce
> > > the size of the binaries.
> >
> > Is there any reason to not just always build the vdso with -O2? It's one
> > page/one VMA either way, and the vdso is about making certain system
> > calls cheaper, so if unconditional -O2 could save a few cycles compared
> > to -Os, why not? (And if, as it seems, there's only one user within the
> > DSO of _restgpr_31_x, yes, the overall size of the .text segment
> > probably increases slightly).
>
> Sometimes -Os generates such horrid code you really never want to use it.
> A classic is on x86 where it replaces 'load register with byte constant'
> with 'push byte' 'pop register'.
> The code is actually smaller but the execution time is horrid.
>
> There are also cases where -O2 actually generates smaller code.
Yes, as with all heuristics it doesn't always work out. But usually -Os
is smaller.
> Although you may need to disable loop unrolling (often dubious at best)
> and either force or disable some function inlining.
The cases where GCC does loop unrolling at -O2 always help quite a lot.
Or, do you have a counter-example? We'd love to see one.
And yup, inlining is hard. GCC's heuristics there are very good
nowadays, but any single decision has big effects. Doing the important
spots manually (always_inline or noinline) has good payoff.
Segher
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-16 0:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-09 6:19 [PATCH] powerpc/vdso32: Add missing _restgpr_31_x to fix build failure Christophe Leroy
2021-03-12 2:29 ` Segher Boessenkool
2021-03-15 16:23 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2021-03-15 16:38 ` David Laight
2021-03-15 23:59 ` Segher Boessenkool [this message]
2021-03-16 9:35 ` David Laight
2021-03-15 23:47 ` Segher Boessenkool
2021-03-12 13:09 ` Christophe Leroy
2021-03-15 13:31 ` Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210315235947.GD16691@gate.crashing.org \
--to=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=David.Laight@aculab.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).