From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24D41C433E1 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 11:26:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3138561A41 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 11:26:53 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 3138561A41 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F5jVg4H8Pz3by6 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 22:26:51 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20201202 header.b=op4lhtXp; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org (client-ip=198.145.29.99; helo=mail.kernel.org; envelope-from=sashal@kernel.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20201202 header.b=op4lhtXp; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F5jVF4YF6z2xfT for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 22:26:29 +1100 (AEDT) Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 929C561A34; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 11:26:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1616671587; bh=MvspNmx/BQ2U6lxFhhm7YQJAvRh6QOInlWJfeIGGQP8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=op4lhtXpH4+JZBNTK6Als9+FV0JJg4OSHgfEzt/spZe8T1zl3n23cM0pJ8npKNBWd c6c7PacjxRiOPZSSC5GLKU1IuuNdvLn5yBcSjSiVqgQtyE7ip43795hj0KGi97nPcL jJrJgcM+JxPNJer8cg7uWhgeDwsjdTrFgvLgsnvm47S3+75jL9T4nmbx4CvvDOq2fj 7nZbPegpFNCZxqrlMQyRSdlspeH/60CYGUOF5guDs5EYhDWNnARcPWn9ZbIRW+ioGy RlHbPPmv1PuReU2MeIm8tad6rLjG44+b/Eo1LimMeXYk3VKj9kxYbBWzP/2gmThLdR 7WLsGhTGVb1rw== From: Sasha Levin To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 21/39] powerpc: Force inlining of cpu_has_feature() to avoid build failure Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 07:25:40 -0400 Message-Id: <20210325112558.1927423-21-sashal@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.1 In-Reply-To: <20210325112558.1927423-1-sashal@kernel.org> References: <20210325112558.1927423-1-sashal@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: Ignore Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Sasha Levin , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" From: Christophe Leroy [ Upstream commit eed5fae00593ab9d261a0c1ffc1bdb786a87a55a ] The code relies on constant folding of cpu_has_feature() based on possible and always true values as defined per CPU_FTRS_ALWAYS and CPU_FTRS_POSSIBLE. Build failure is encountered with for instance book3e_all_defconfig on kisskb in the AMDGPU driver which uses cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_VSX_COMP) to decide whether calling kernel_enable_vsx() or not. The failure is due to cpu_has_feature() not being inlined with that configuration with gcc 4.9. In the same way as commit acdad8fb4a15 ("powerpc: Force inlining of mmu_has_feature to fix build failure"), for inlining of cpu_has_feature(). Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/b231dfa040ce4cc37f702f5c3a595fdeabfe0462.1615378209.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- arch/powerpc/include/asm/cpu_has_feature.h | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/cpu_has_feature.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/cpu_has_feature.h index 7897d16e0990..727d4b321937 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/cpu_has_feature.h +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/cpu_has_feature.h @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ #include #include -static inline bool early_cpu_has_feature(unsigned long feature) +static __always_inline bool early_cpu_has_feature(unsigned long feature) { return !!((CPU_FTRS_ALWAYS & feature) || (CPU_FTRS_POSSIBLE & cur_cpu_spec->cpu_features & feature)); @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ static __always_inline bool cpu_has_feature(unsigned long feature) return static_branch_likely(&cpu_feature_keys[i]); } #else -static inline bool cpu_has_feature(unsigned long feature) +static __always_inline bool cpu_has_feature(unsigned long feature) { return early_cpu_has_feature(feature); } -- 2.30.1