From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6428BC433C1 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 10:08:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFE8461585 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 10:08:29 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org BFE8461585 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F87ZN2GpRz2yYf for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 21:08:28 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20201202 header.b=f9EhhMV0; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org (client-ip=198.145.29.99; helo=mail.kernel.org; envelope-from=will@kernel.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20201202 header.b=f9EhhMV0; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F87Yx2j0qz2y0G for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 21:08:05 +1100 (AEDT) Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4C2D161585; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 10:07:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1617012476; bh=pMPh6eyELHUsFo1+GSOTU018GXuHnqwmLWfjowXKpSM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=f9EhhMV0Q2/acyWJ/ZfxNWBKDPSPFcewP+yYd7grUMYR6ohYLn/GQbjkVRfpx6hy1 qlz2kGTV6H9hIJ3P83OFCRWasmAPh0B4tg4uRiF/UiE/RSNCbR5Vp/lFYg26JDmhOc MWyUZuzkuVH70jdZJzCAyLBOqrXhFTb1bKdlZHGSYbFlC9bk2RUcV6QNHQmOXZOSfw MB8cWs05TS9x1iAejddICQs8gS82J+9FM1MYdvz//gI0U56nk09G1BsYCdMIXSnO7c KleBb0hQlKjIQJz/LgOJaH5ew9SHfhQgI3a4l184IRzCzZU/6ZjlfekxQPDfmmV3Jo EOvtS+AxR38PQ== Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 11:07:51 +0100 From: Will Deacon To: Daniel Walker Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] powerpc: convert config files to generic cmdline Message-ID: <20210329100750.GB3207@willie-the-truck> References: <20210309000247.2989531-4-danielwa@cisco.com> <5f865584-09c9-d21f-ffb7-23cf07cf058e@csgroup.eu> <20210309212944.GR109100@zorba> <20fd7d44-8c39-48bc-25c3-990be9d9d911@csgroup.eu> <20210325195956.GM109100@zorba> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210325195956.GM109100@zorba> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Rob Herring , Daniel Gimpelevich , X86 ML , "open list:MIPS" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Paul Mackerras , xe-linux-external@cisco.com, Andrew Morton , linuxppc-dev Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 12:59:56PM -0700, Daniel Walker wrote: > On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 01:03:55PM +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote: > > > > Ok, so you agree we don't need to provide two CMDLINE, one to be appended and one to be prepended. > > > > Let's only provide once CMDLINE as of today, and ask the user to select > > whether he wants it appended or prepended or replacee. Then no need to > > change all existing config to rename CONFIG_CMDLINE into either of the new > > ones. > > > > That's the main difference between my series and Daniel's series. So I'll > > finish taking Will's comment into account and we'll send out a v3 soon. > > It doesn't solve the needs of Cisco, I've stated many times your changes have > little value. Please stop submitting them. FWIW, they're useful for arm64 and I will gladly review the updated series. I don't think asking people to stop submitting patches is ever the right answer. Please don't do that. Will