From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4FE0C433ED for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2021 09:03:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1B7A61026 for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2021 09:03:23 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org F1B7A61026 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FGscB4mKXz3cTJ for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2021 19:03:22 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com (client-ip=45.249.212.191; helo=szxga05-in.huawei.com; envelope-from=cuibixuan@huawei.com; receiver=) Received: from szxga05-in.huawei.com (szxga05-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.191]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FGsZv3bYgz3bvg for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2021 19:02:14 +1000 (AEST) Received: from DGGEMS407-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.59]) by szxga05-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4FGsWY5hzHzPpQ3; Fri, 9 Apr 2021 16:59:21 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.174.28.241) by DGGEMS407-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.207) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.498.0; Fri, 9 Apr 2021 17:02:03 +0800 From: Bixuan Cui To: , Michael Ellerman , Kajol Jain , "Gautham R. Shenoy" , "Madhavan Srinivasan" Subject: [PATCH -next] powerpc/perf/hv-24x7: Make some symbols static Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2021 17:01:24 +0800 Message-ID: <20210409090124.59492-1-cuibixuan@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.174.28.241] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" The sparse tool complains as follows: arch/powerpc/perf/hv-24x7.c:229:1: warning: symbol '__pcpu_scope_hv_24x7_txn_flags' was not declared. Should it be static? arch/powerpc/perf/hv-24x7.c:230:1: warning: symbol '__pcpu_scope_hv_24x7_txn_err' was not declared. Should it be static? arch/powerpc/perf/hv-24x7.c:236:1: warning: symbol '__pcpu_scope_hv_24x7_hw' was not declared. Should it be static? arch/powerpc/perf/hv-24x7.c:244:1: warning: symbol '__pcpu_scope_hv_24x7_reqb' was not declared. Should it be static? arch/powerpc/perf/hv-24x7.c:245:1: warning: symbol '__pcpu_scope_hv_24x7_resb' was not declared. Should it be static? This symbol is not used outside of hv-24x7.c, so this commit marks it static. Reported-by: Hulk Robot Signed-off-by: Bixuan Cui --- arch/powerpc/perf/hv-24x7.c | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/hv-24x7.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/hv-24x7.c index e5eb33255066..1816f560a465 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/hv-24x7.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/hv-24x7.c @@ -226,14 +226,14 @@ static struct attribute_group event_long_desc_group = { static struct kmem_cache *hv_page_cache; -DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, hv_24x7_txn_flags); -DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, hv_24x7_txn_err); +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, hv_24x7_txn_flags); +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, hv_24x7_txn_err); struct hv_24x7_hw { struct perf_event *events[255]; }; -DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct hv_24x7_hw, hv_24x7_hw); +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct hv_24x7_hw, hv_24x7_hw); /* * request_buffer and result_buffer are not required to be 4k aligned, @@ -241,8 +241,8 @@ DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct hv_24x7_hw, hv_24x7_hw); * the simplest way to ensure that. */ #define H24x7_DATA_BUFFER_SIZE 4096 -DEFINE_PER_CPU(char, hv_24x7_reqb[H24x7_DATA_BUFFER_SIZE]) __aligned(4096); -DEFINE_PER_CPU(char, hv_24x7_resb[H24x7_DATA_BUFFER_SIZE]) __aligned(4096); +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(char, hv_24x7_reqb[H24x7_DATA_BUFFER_SIZE]) __aligned(4096); +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(char, hv_24x7_resb[H24x7_DATA_BUFFER_SIZE]) __aligned(4096); static unsigned int max_num_requests(int interface_version) {