From: Leonardo Bras <leobras.c@gmail.com>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Leonardo Bras <leobras.c@gmail.com>,
Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
Nathan Lynch <nathanl@linux.ibm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Scott Cheloha <cheloha@linux.ibm.com>,
Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/3] powerpc/mm/hash: Time improvements for memory hot(un)plug
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 11:36:04 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210430143607.135005-1-leobras.c@gmail.com> (raw)
This patchset intends to reduce time needed for processing memory
hotplug/hotunplug in hash guests.
The first one, makes sure guests with pagesize over 4k don't need to
go through HPT resize-downs after memory hotplug.
The second and third patches make hotplug / hotunplug perform a single
HPT resize per operation, instead of one for each shift change, or one
for each LMB in case of resize-down error.
Why haven't the same mechanism used for both memory hotplug and hotunplug?
They both have different requirements:
Memory hotplug causes (usually) HPT resize-ups, which are fine happening
at the start of hotplug, but resize-ups should not ever be disabled, as
other mechanisms may try to increase memory, hitting issues with a HPT
that is too small.
Memory hotunplug causes HPT resize-downs, which can be disabled (HPT will
just remain larger for a while), but need to happen at the end of an
hotunplug operation. If we want to batch it, we need to disable
resize-downs and perform it only at the end.
Tests done with this patchset in the same machine / guest config:
Starting memory: 129GB, DIMM: 256GB
Before patchset: hotplug = 710s, hotunplug = 621s.
After patchset: hotplug = 21s, hotunplug = 100s.
Any feedback will be appreciated!
Changes since v1:
- Atomic used to disable resize was replaced by a mutex
- Removed wrappers, testing for !radix directly in hot(un)plug routine
- Added bounds to HPT resize loop
- Removed batching from dlpar_memory_*_by_index, as it adds a single LMB
Best regards,
Leonardo Bras (3):
powerpc/mm/hash: Avoid resizing-down HPT on first memory hotplug
powerpc/mm/hash: Avoid multiple HPT resize-ups on memory hotplug
powerpc/mm/hash: Avoid multiple HPT resize-downs on memory hotunplug
arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/hash.h | 4 +
arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/hash_utils.c | 95 ++++++++++++++++---
.../platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c | 35 +++++++
3 files changed, 119 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
--
2.30.2
next reply other threads:[~2021-04-30 14:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-30 14:36 Leonardo Bras [this message]
2021-04-30 14:36 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] powerpc/mm/hash: Avoid resizing-down HPT on first memory hotplug Leonardo Bras
2021-06-07 5:02 ` David Gibson
2021-06-09 0:52 ` Leonardo Brás
2021-06-09 4:40 ` David Gibson
2021-06-09 5:51 ` Leonardo Brás
2021-06-09 6:59 ` David Gibson
2021-04-30 14:36 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] powerpc/mm/hash: Avoid multiple HPT resize-ups on " Leonardo Bras
2021-06-07 5:10 ` David Gibson
2021-06-09 3:09 ` Leonardo Brás
2021-04-30 14:36 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] powerpc/mm/hash: Avoid multiple HPT resize-downs on memory hotunplug Leonardo Bras
2021-06-07 5:20 ` David Gibson
2021-06-09 5:30 ` Leonardo Brás
2021-06-09 6:08 ` David Gibson
2021-04-30 14:41 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] powerpc/mm/hash: Time improvements for memory hot(un)plug Leonardo Bras
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210430143607.135005-1-leobras.c@gmail.com \
--to=leobras.c@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=cheloha@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=ldufour@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=nathanl@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=sandipan@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).