From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4944DC433B4 for ; Mon, 10 May 2021 15:03:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D157061421 for ; Mon, 10 May 2021 15:03:26 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D157061421 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lst.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Ff47K2LDMz3btx for ; Tue, 11 May 2021 01:03:25 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=lst.de (client-ip=213.95.11.211; helo=verein.lst.de; envelope-from=hch@lst.de; receiver=) Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Ff46v33Jtz2y0B for ; Tue, 11 May 2021 01:03:03 +1000 (AEST) Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 2B33867373; Mon, 10 May 2021 17:02:57 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 17:02:56 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Claire Chang Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 04/15] swiotlb: Add restricted DMA pool initialization Message-ID: <20210510150256.GC28066@lst.de> References: <20210510095026.3477496-1-tientzu@chromium.org> <20210510095026.3477496-5-tientzu@chromium.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210510095026.3477496-5-tientzu@chromium.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com, thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com, peterz@infradead.org, joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, chris@chris-wilson.co.uk, grant.likely@arm.com, paulus@samba.org, Frank Rowand , mingo@kernel.org, Marek Szyprowski , sstabellini@kernel.org, Saravana Kannan , Joerg Roedel , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Christoph Hellwig , Bartosz Golaszewski , bskeggs@redhat.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Thierry Reding , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, matthew.auld@intel.com, linux-devicetree , jxgao@google.com, daniel@ffwll.ch, Will Deacon , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com, airlied@linux.ie, Dan Williams , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, jani.nikula@linux.intel.com, Rob Herring , rodrigo.vivi@intel.com, bhelgaas@google.com, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, Andy Shevchenko , jgross@suse.com, Nicolas Boichat , nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org, Greg KH , Randy Dunlap , lkml , tfiga@chromium.org, "list@263.net:IOMMU DRIVERS" , Jim Quinlan , xypron.glpk@gmx.de, Robin Murphy , bauerman@linux.ibm.com Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" > +#ifdef CONFIG_DMA_RESTRICTED_POOL > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#endif I don't think any of this belongs into swiotlb.c. Marking swiotlb_init_io_tlb_mem non-static and having all this code in a separate file is probably a better idea. > +#ifdef CONFIG_DMA_RESTRICTED_POOL > +static int rmem_swiotlb_device_init(struct reserved_mem *rmem, > + struct device *dev) > +{ > + struct io_tlb_mem *mem = rmem->priv; > + unsigned long nslabs = rmem->size >> IO_TLB_SHIFT; > + > + if (dev->dma_io_tlb_mem) > + return 0; > + > + /* Since multiple devices can share the same pool, the private data, > + * io_tlb_mem struct, will be initialized by the first device attached > + * to it. > + */ This is not the normal kernel comment style. > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM > + if (!PageHighMem(pfn_to_page(PHYS_PFN(rmem->base)))) { > + kfree(mem); > + return -EINVAL; > + } > +#endif /* CONFIG_ARM */ And this is weird. Why would ARM have such a restriction? And if we have such rstrictions it absolutely belongs into an arch helper. > + swiotlb_init_io_tlb_mem(mem, rmem->base, nslabs, false); > + > + rmem->priv = mem; > + > +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS > + if (!debugfs_dir) > + debugfs_dir = debugfs_create_dir("swiotlb", NULL); > + > + swiotlb_create_debugfs(mem, rmem->name, debugfs_dir); Doesn't the debugfs_create_dir belong into swiotlb_create_debugfs? Also please use IS_ENABLEd or a stub to avoid ifdefs like this.