From: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>
To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com,
christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
Cc: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>
Subject: [PATCH] powerpc: make show_stack's stack walking KASAN-safe
Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 17:48:06 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210528074806.1311297-1-dja@axtens.net> (raw)
Make our stack-walking code KASAN-safe by using READ_ONCE_NOCHECK -
generic code, arm64, s390 and x86 all do this for similar sorts of
reasons: when unwinding a stack, we might touch memory that KASAN has
marked as being out-of-bounds. In ppc64 KASAN development, I hit this
sometimes when checking for an exception frame - because we're checking
an arbitrary offset into the stack frame.
See commit 20955746320e ("s390/kasan: avoid false positives during stack
unwind"), commit bcaf669b4bdb ("arm64: disable kasan when accessing
frame->fp in unwind_frame"), commit 91e08ab0c851 ("x86/dumpstack:
Prevent KASAN false positive warnings") and commit 6e22c8366416
("tracing, kasan: Silence Kasan warning in check_stack of stack_tracer").
Signed-off-by: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c | 16 +++++++++-------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
index 89e34aa273e2..430cf06f9406 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
@@ -2151,8 +2151,8 @@ void show_stack(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long *stack,
break;
stack = (unsigned long *) sp;
- newsp = stack[0];
- ip = stack[STACK_FRAME_LR_SAVE];
+ newsp = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(stack[0]);
+ ip = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(stack[STACK_FRAME_LR_SAVE]);
if (!firstframe || ip != lr) {
printk("%s["REG"] ["REG"] %pS",
loglvl, sp, ip, (void *)ip);
@@ -2170,17 +2170,19 @@ void show_stack(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long *stack,
* See if this is an exception frame.
* We look for the "regshere" marker in the current frame.
*/
- if (validate_sp(sp, tsk, STACK_FRAME_WITH_PT_REGS)
- && stack[STACK_FRAME_MARKER] == STACK_FRAME_REGS_MARKER) {
+ if (validate_sp(sp, tsk, STACK_FRAME_WITH_PT_REGS) &&
+ (READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(stack[STACK_FRAME_MARKER]) ==
+ STACK_FRAME_REGS_MARKER)) {
struct pt_regs *regs = (struct pt_regs *)
(sp + STACK_FRAME_OVERHEAD);
- lr = regs->link;
+ lr = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(regs->link);
printk("%s--- interrupt: %lx at %pS\n",
- loglvl, regs->trap, (void *)regs->nip);
+ loglvl, READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(regs->trap),
+ (void *)READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(regs->nip));
__show_regs(regs);
printk("%s--- interrupt: %lx\n",
- loglvl, regs->trap);
+ loglvl, READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(regs->trap));
firstframe = 1;
}
--
2.27.0
next reply other threads:[~2021-05-28 7:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-28 7:48 Daniel Axtens [this message]
2021-06-01 7:22 ` [PATCH] powerpc: make show_stack's stack walking KASAN-safe Christophe Leroy
2021-06-01 9:40 ` Naveen N. Rao
2021-06-01 14:42 ` Daniel Axtens
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210528074806.1311297-1-dja@axtens.net \
--to=dja@axtens.net \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).