From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E03BC47082 for ; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 11:30:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1D4661090 for ; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 11:30:29 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D1D4661090 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=roeck-us.net Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FzB4h6PN1z3brv for ; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 21:30:28 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20161025 header.b=l3tb4Ti3; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com (client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::32f; helo=mail-ot1-x32f.google.com; envelope-from=groeck7@gmail.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20161025 header.b=l3tb4Ti3; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail-ot1-x32f.google.com (mail-ot1-x32f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32f]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FzB450yKTz2xfY for ; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 21:29:56 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-ot1-x32f.google.com with SMTP id h24-20020a9d64180000b029036edcf8f9a6so16360370otl.3 for ; Mon, 07 Jun 2021 04:29:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=ouJCJpb+cVjhmk8j2qfxiU2PiYqfLkfly1jYgo8fmy4=; b=l3tb4Ti3/ESiVNC9be61igb7NBBFLs9+KwCCmS9OlfdmYt9uey00TQd3qX11GWioZN 1+ht04CVQrf0UM6VxgqDaPTArSmodK3BYXWL0udJ10T612ebj1W+0ybZrwUKDjsQuhz9 aWq1IA6ZVklOffOiHORlXUO69XDw1ADiZSo4idLvQ6h12ToQK4a3jHvnbUEDNlOV7+01 LHmOyaDW05UPY+c5NgwRVD0iUH0Ay+szsy6qGJttnnxPj4TS8L4kte71gGZfk7PUgjGH YTpNlsQaMR01+gfrJZDGC4WLAe6ZtK5ULr1ZXOXZv/AUuicjXaRdIFWza8lUe7VY4EFm 7eVg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=ouJCJpb+cVjhmk8j2qfxiU2PiYqfLkfly1jYgo8fmy4=; b=NDQSkNdeAVywKnh/R7z1j4ejBIL+rpjbQGgeEyyWMlhY+62E7UOVA/37JQYpEw+YWW MxVgZr+HfUQM5x4u8rOWI799inMbW4S+ja/HnauVLgJeRUtqec8jKjWUh+Jhiflsx7L1 vWzKcNCwRj9r6OeUW3vy71zEhV7IcoUKSk7huif/O8+zCOTHSeI/x7pFXZQFN5HxPv7D 0SFH2HK8RlLzYL6wBAIYLm5K8ZBUFbMOIwu9RMxrIDdTHr1kHYNyb/2Hz+1QwkkV8Aba LUxbGYcHWJfC8E/4SkGtCW9KbBIJh6GbGgh7VsWjCAMXJILN+mx7AjF7f/jbSI8OUH3e 9ydQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533DVJ2f53FZN8igon3cg2qFmYbs3i0I4ip6VUqeFaPL+oDFMX9j TzVWWDIV3z4zrPctps1NwAc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwfGgFpT8BfA9ywyPV9GozhTIyRKAxRs5/zwSlum7MqzjvC9UecMC6ghRBNcLEBwvai1toqHQ== X-Received: by 2002:a9d:560a:: with SMTP id e10mr13685889oti.353.1623065392393; Mon, 07 Jun 2021 04:29:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2600:1700:e321:62f0:329c:23ff:fee3:9d7c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l9sm2105274oou.43.2021.06.07.04.29.51 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 07 Jun 2021 04:29:51 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2021 04:29:50 -0700 From: Guenter Roeck To: Michael Ellerman Subject: Re: [PATCH] watchdog: Remove MV64x60 watchdog driver Message-ID: <20210607112950.GB314533@roeck-us.net> References: <9c2952bcfaec3b1789909eaa36bbce2afbfab7ab.1616085654.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> <31d702e5-22d1-1766-76dd-e24860e5b1a4@roeck-us.net> <87im3hk3t2.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> <87czsyfo01.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87czsyfo01.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Wim Van Sebroeck , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Sebastian Hesselbarth Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 11:43:26AM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote: > Guenter Roeck writes: > > On 5/17/21 4:17 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote: > >> Guenter Roeck writes: > >>> On 3/18/21 10:25 AM, Christophe Leroy wrote: > >>>> Commit 92c8c16f3457 ("powerpc/embedded6xx: Remove C2K board support") > >>>> removed the last selector of CONFIG_MV64X60. > >>>> > >>>> Therefore CONFIG_MV64X60_WDT cannot be selected anymore and > >>>> can be removed. > >>>> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy > >>> > >>> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck > >>> > >>>> --- > >>>> drivers/watchdog/Kconfig | 4 - > >>>> drivers/watchdog/Makefile | 1 - > >>>> drivers/watchdog/mv64x60_wdt.c | 324 --------------------------------- > >>>> include/linux/mv643xx.h | 8 - > >>>> 4 files changed, 337 deletions(-) > >>>> delete mode 100644 drivers/watchdog/mv64x60_wdt.c > >> > >> I assumed this would go via the watchdog tree, but seems like I > >> misinterpreted. > >> > > > > Wim didn't send a pull request this time around. > > > > Guenter > > > >> Should I take this via the powerpc tree for v5.14 ? > > I still don't see this in the watchdog tree, should I take it? > It is in my personal watchdog-next tree, but afaics Wim hasn't picked any of it up yet. Wim ? Thanks, Guenter