From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] powerpc/64s/interrupt: Check and fix srr_valid without crashing
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2021 16:04:16 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210622060416.548187-3-npiggin@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210622060416.548187-1-npiggin@gmail.com>
The PPC_RFI_SRR_DEBUG check added by patch "powerpc/64s: avoid reloading
(H)SRR registers if they are still valid" has a few deficiencies. It
does not fix the actual problem, it's not enabled by default, and it
causes a program check interrupt which can cause more difficulties.
However there are a lot of paths which may clobber SRRs or change return
regs, and difficult to have a high confidence that all paths are covered
without wider testing.
Add a relatively low overhead always-enabled check that catches most
such cases, reports once, and fixes it so the kernel can continue.
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/interrupt.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 58 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/interrupt.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/interrupt.c
index 05fa3ae56e25..5920a3e8d1d5 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/interrupt.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/interrupt.c
@@ -231,6 +231,56 @@ static notrace void booke_load_dbcr0(void)
#endif
}
+#include <linux/sched/debug.h> /* for show_regs */
+static void check_return_regs_valid(struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_64
+ static bool warned = false;
+
+ if (regs->trap == 0x980 || regs->trap == 0xe00 || regs->trap == 0xe20 ||
+ regs->trap == 0xe40 || regs->trap == 0xe60 || regs->trap == 0xe80 ||
+ regs->trap == 0xea0 || regs->trap == 0xf80 || regs->trap == 0x1200 ||
+ regs->trap == 0x1500 || regs->trap == 0x1600 || regs->trap == 0x1800) {
+ if (local_paca->hsrr_valid) {
+ unsigned long hsrr0 = mfspr(SPRN_HSRR0);
+ unsigned long hsrr1 = mfspr(SPRN_HSRR1);
+
+ if (hsrr0 == regs->nip && hsrr1 == regs->msr)
+ return;
+
+ if (!warned) {
+ warned = true;
+ printk("HSRR0 was: %lx should be: %lx\n",
+ hsrr0, regs->nip);
+ printk("HSRR1 was: %lx should be: %lx\n",
+ hsrr1, regs->msr);
+ show_regs(regs);
+ }
+ local_paca->hsrr_valid = 0; /* fixup */
+ }
+
+ } else if (regs->trap != 0x3000) {
+ if (local_paca->srr_valid) {
+ unsigned long srr0 = mfspr(SPRN_SRR0);
+ unsigned long srr1 = mfspr(SPRN_SRR1);
+
+ if (srr0 == regs->nip && srr1 == regs->msr)
+ return;
+
+ if (!warned) {
+ warned = true;
+ printk("SRR0 was: %lx should be: %lx\n",
+ srr0, regs->nip);
+ printk("SRR1 was: %lx should be: %lx\n",
+ srr1, regs->msr);
+ show_regs(regs);
+ }
+ local_paca->srr_valid = 0; /* fixup */
+ }
+ }
+#endif
+}
+
/*
* This should be called after a syscall returns, with r3 the return value
* from the syscall. If this function returns non-zero, the system call
@@ -327,6 +377,8 @@ notrace unsigned long syscall_exit_prepare(unsigned long r3,
}
}
+ check_return_regs_valid(regs);
+
user_enter_irqoff();
/* scv need not set RI=0 because SRRs are not used */
@@ -405,6 +457,8 @@ notrace unsigned long interrupt_exit_user_prepare(struct pt_regs *regs)
}
}
+ check_return_regs_valid(regs);
+
user_enter_irqoff();
if (unlikely(!__prep_irq_for_enabled_exit(true))) {
@@ -469,9 +523,13 @@ notrace unsigned long interrupt_exit_kernel_prepare(struct pt_regs *regs)
}
}
+ check_return_regs_valid(regs);
+
if (unlikely(!prep_irq_for_enabled_exit(true, !irqs_disabled_flags(flags))))
goto again;
} else {
+ check_return_regs_valid(regs);
+
/* Returning to a kernel context with local irqs disabled. */
__hard_EE_RI_disable();
#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
--
2.23.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-22 6:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-22 6:04 [PATCH 0/2] fast interrupts fixes Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-22 6:04 ` [PATCH 1/2] powerpc/64s: Fix "avoid reloading (H)SRR registers if they are still valid" Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-22 6:04 ` Nicholas Piggin [this message]
2021-06-22 6:47 ` [PATCH 2/2] powerpc/64s/interrupt: Check and fix srr_valid without crashing Christophe Leroy
2021-06-22 8:54 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-22 8:55 ` Christophe Leroy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210622060416.548187-3-npiggin@gmail.com \
--to=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).