From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B80C3C433EF for ; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 21:28:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4J17Cq1z30z3cVK for ; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 08:28:55 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20210112 header.b=b2ZfJiMe; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com (client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::132; helo=mail-lf1-x132.google.com; envelope-from=digetx@gmail.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20210112 header.b=b2ZfJiMe; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail-lf1-x132.google.com (mail-lf1-x132.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::132]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4J12d30PsYz30BM for ; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 05:01:59 +1100 (AEDT) Received: by mail-lf1-x132.google.com with SMTP id u3so26097984lfl.2 for ; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 10:01:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=hKe22x9bX8JCg83Zw5KeGH71BwPAfgMBPhF5RAtnzGg=; b=b2ZfJiMeqx8AeLNXyztIQbqzNlGBVbhad44TGqM7lHiw/fjxif6gU0gZoYYArSlKqo EeAwZj+BCdzu3uIIM/smFVDttYIEyo/Z4cQTphN83yvq86PvnU0W4Ie+2AQfRx3m6El9 ezh/1hh7/6Ybscv4tcBLpgDBuHeraJRPSdMAVRwkC5F75rh6n2MHscxaOB/rlIJUGpHn JYFzCa+B1QR2KMEZvRV/l+C8C5tLmBjWELwgqyH4k7ET0Q1PJi6aubc/gMu03uwbYwz0 9IzBTEPDl6TbzF28FQAcA3Viml2my3zBgMjGFEkpGjjrauzxX9PSIX9E5Ca5qAHE77RJ Cyjw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=hKe22x9bX8JCg83Zw5KeGH71BwPAfgMBPhF5RAtnzGg=; b=K0twpEUMQf9HH7VQPQp86jjBGrBgJQ2xS3SBOPgbIxskOMzawx+Z6O5FV2WA5RGIki sDK6DYuaj0u1ZarnoHcK2TMjqn4NH0egd83BZiXdpKt/s50vLfGlvaMSHDtPA7GSPsLb 9lkVAFeHMxeBYpP9frrCTfnlLHJj9uH+DA6/e1NLJJBK3Q3Oode0uzM86tQ4QKmiGGrR 2qCK1uWJxTY/I+JVD/Bht8k0uVVflP2jTjl5L0Z8tOygLrX+x6uryqDPTkwVI7Zz6F5O QFauufVFL4othXuQSd5gvzB3E7IhPArFn5M8aGQBkAggrOQXPQCYT9yi+qvGJqC+lY8p R/3g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532ji8z8c3XTviBzHU6ENJYY/v1P4O6tRn3fBZRVfLkLAJlSmB6r qqGuYCguh/jJkzN0sMChw3A= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxizgxN6H8utklWV5PP7BDnBAFFswn6Wu2IY4jESwUo2k1vRD/GT6BFqxqb00p7BIY/tAXbNQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:3192:: with SMTP id i18mr30735000lfe.205.1637949715998; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 10:01:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (94-29-48-99.dynamic.spd-mgts.ru. [94.29.48.99]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i32sm553831lfv.295.2021.11.26.10.01.53 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 26 Nov 2021 10:01:55 -0800 (PST) From: Dmitry Osipenko To: Thierry Reding , Jonathan Hunter , Russell King , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Guo Ren , Geert Uytterhoeven , Greg Ungerer , Joshua Thompson , Thomas Bogendoerfer , Sebastian Reichel , Linus Walleij , Philipp Zabel , Greentime Hu , Vincent Chen , "James E.J. Bottomley" , Helge Deller , Michael Ellerman , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Yoshinori Sato , Rich Felker , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Boris Ostrovsky , Juergen Gross , Stefano Stabellini , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown , Santosh Shilimkar , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Liam Girdwood , Mark Brown , Pavel Machek , Lee Jones , Andrew Morton , Guenter Roeck , Daniel Lezcano , Andy Shevchenko , Ulf Hansson , alankao@andestech.com, "K . C . Kuen-Chern Lin" Subject: [PATCH v4 03/25] notifier: Add atomic/blocking_notifier_has_unique_priority() Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2021 21:00:39 +0300 Message-Id: <20211126180101.27818-4-digetx@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.33.1 In-Reply-To: <20211126180101.27818-1-digetx@gmail.com> References: <20211126180101.27818-1-digetx@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 27 Nov 2021 08:26:31 +1100 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Add atomic/blocking_notifier_has_unique_priority() helpers which return true if given handler has unique priority. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko --- include/linux/notifier.h | 5 +++ kernel/notifier.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 74 insertions(+) diff --git a/include/linux/notifier.h b/include/linux/notifier.h index 924c9d7c8e73..2c4036f225e1 100644 --- a/include/linux/notifier.h +++ b/include/linux/notifier.h @@ -175,6 +175,11 @@ int raw_notifier_call_chain_robust(struct raw_notifier_head *nh, bool blocking_notifier_call_chain_is_empty(struct blocking_notifier_head *nh); +bool atomic_notifier_has_unique_priority(struct atomic_notifier_head *nh, + struct notifier_block *nb); +bool blocking_notifier_has_unique_priority(struct blocking_notifier_head *nh, + struct notifier_block *nb); + #define NOTIFY_DONE 0x0000 /* Don't care */ #define NOTIFY_OK 0x0001 /* Suits me */ #define NOTIFY_STOP_MASK 0x8000 /* Don't call further */ diff --git a/kernel/notifier.c b/kernel/notifier.c index b20cb7b9b1f0..7a325b742104 100644 --- a/kernel/notifier.c +++ b/kernel/notifier.c @@ -122,6 +122,19 @@ static int notifier_call_chain_robust(struct notifier_block **nl, return ret; } +static int notifier_has_unique_priority(struct notifier_block **nl, + struct notifier_block *n) +{ + while (*nl && (*nl)->priority >= n->priority) { + if ((*nl)->priority == n->priority && *nl != n) + return false; + + nl = &((*nl)->next); + } + + return true; +} + /* * Atomic notifier chain routines. Registration and unregistration * use a spinlock, and call_chain is synchronized by RCU (no locks). @@ -203,6 +216,30 @@ int atomic_notifier_call_chain(struct atomic_notifier_head *nh, EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(atomic_notifier_call_chain); NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(atomic_notifier_call_chain); +/** + * atomic_notifier_has_unique_priority - Checks whether notifier's priority is unique + * @nh: Pointer to head of the atomic notifier chain + * @n: Entry in notifier chain to check + * + * Checks whether there is another notifier in the chain with the same priority. + * Must be called in process context. + * + * Returns true if priority is unique, false otherwise. + */ +bool atomic_notifier_has_unique_priority(struct atomic_notifier_head *nh, + struct notifier_block *n) +{ + unsigned long flags; + bool ret; + + spin_lock_irqsave(&nh->lock, flags); + ret = notifier_has_unique_priority(&nh->head, n); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&nh->lock, flags); + + return ret; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(atomic_notifier_has_unique_priority); + /* * Blocking notifier chain routines. All access to the chain is * synchronized by an rwsem. @@ -336,6 +373,38 @@ bool blocking_notifier_call_chain_is_empty(struct blocking_notifier_head *nh) } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blocking_notifier_call_chain_is_empty); +/** + * blocking_notifier_has_unique_priority - Checks whether notifier's priority is unique + * @nh: Pointer to head of the blocking notifier chain + * @n: Entry in notifier chain to check + * + * Checks whether there is another notifier in the chain with the same priority. + * Must be called in process context. + * + * Returns true if priority is unique, false otherwise. + */ +bool blocking_notifier_has_unique_priority(struct blocking_notifier_head *nh, + struct notifier_block *n) +{ + bool ret; + + /* + * This code gets used during boot-up, when task switching is + * not yet working and interrupts must remain disabled. At such + * times we must not call down_read(). + */ + if (system_state != SYSTEM_BOOTING) + down_read(&nh->rwsem); + + ret = notifier_has_unique_priority(&nh->head, n); + + if (system_state != SYSTEM_BOOTING) + up_read(&nh->rwsem); + + return ret; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blocking_notifier_has_unique_priority); + /* * Raw notifier chain routines. There is no protection; * the caller must provide it. Use at your own risk! -- 2.33.1