From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A2FEC433EF for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 04:50:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4KFD4k6KQKz30Jk for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 15:49:58 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=linux-foundation.org header.i=@linux-foundation.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=korg header.b=RiCFEZwB; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux-foundation.org (client-ip=145.40.68.75; helo=ams.source.kernel.org; envelope-from=akpm@linux-foundation.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=linux-foundation.org header.i=@linux-foundation.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=korg header.b=RiCFEZwB; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [145.40.68.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4KFD42601lz2xTn for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 15:49:22 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42D80B82A7B; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 04:49:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 85350C340EC; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 04:49:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linux-foundation.org; s=korg; t=1646974158; bh=ieKn790GjrKSPuQn2caaZWrzBmooKYSB6PRk5jmqHFQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=RiCFEZwBuQmmlgqHA+kqM/K6eJdBD9xlftp7cCJ5OGOGTeIyz87Fuq0iGjyKcsQBL vBl7/JIVlxHBbL5/2DwFurRmzUKDbDDJDSAgMikQ8N1XkICyckwdAugEPNVo1fpCdR wy5s2Gdn/tqDbRW9VclshFIYtN0XHH7w6epPguo8= Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 20:49:17 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Michael Ellerman Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 00/14] Convert powerpc to default topdown mmap layout (v8) Message-Id: <20220310204917.3d42e6cf3088f7cf1c7fe7a6@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <877d91m7wd.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> References: <877d91m7wd.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "alex@ghiti.fr" , "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , Paul Mackerras , "catalin.marinas@arm.com" , "will@kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Fri, 11 Mar 2022 15:26:42 +1100 Michael Ellerman wrote: > > What will be the merge strategy ? I guess it's a bit late to get it > > through powerpc tree, so I was just wondering whether we could get > > patches 2 to 5 in mm this cycle, and the powerpc ones next cycle ? > > Yeah I didn't pick it up because the mm changes don't have many acks and > I'm always nervous about carrying generic mm changes. > > It would be my preference if Andrew could take 2-5 through mm for v5.18, > but it is quite late, so I'm not sure how he will feel about that. 5.18 isn't a problem. Perhaps you meant 5.17, which would be real tough. Can we take a look after 5.18-rc1?