From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A18DDC433F5 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 22:11:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4KJ70s03wDz3bdh for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2022 09:11:41 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=Q678Y8av; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=Q678Y8av; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com (client-ip=170.10.129.124; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com; envelope-from=jpoimboe@redhat.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=Q678Y8av; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=Q678Y8av; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4KJ6zc6gFZz30J7 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2022 09:10:36 +1100 (AEDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1647382234; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=sQtSBHNQH4OCn0hjFNRX0y7NCWzjkpGXawmrdrNsMPU=; b=Q678Y8avw30TUZxUrgvKiqRyOZByAS8j/bh8bCaGdqWJ85t4rLyVoFPRpuIyJvEufyiNPe 3B/n57toJeqWuUziLHcMx3nQ94ET42BdO8DO8ywl8KwAB61UpptZUwGZHt1GdS7pO44bI+ biKtLIhEO17qafJU5Js/DdyKzbkP6RA= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1647382234; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=sQtSBHNQH4OCn0hjFNRX0y7NCWzjkpGXawmrdrNsMPU=; b=Q678Y8avw30TUZxUrgvKiqRyOZByAS8j/bh8bCaGdqWJ85t4rLyVoFPRpuIyJvEufyiNPe 3B/n57toJeqWuUziLHcMx3nQ94ET42BdO8DO8ywl8KwAB61UpptZUwGZHt1GdS7pO44bI+ biKtLIhEO17qafJU5Js/DdyKzbkP6RA= Received: from mail-ot1-f71.google.com (mail-ot1-f71.google.com [209.85.210.71]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-413-1snqSJEPNtCL4Myw8Q8zBw-1; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 18:10:32 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 1snqSJEPNtCL4Myw8Q8zBw-1 Received: by mail-ot1-f71.google.com with SMTP id q18-20020a05683022d200b005b23730dc8eso183439otc.19 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 15:10:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=sQtSBHNQH4OCn0hjFNRX0y7NCWzjkpGXawmrdrNsMPU=; b=1wDrlHf6y7qAUvJFA0wICjjPeEIaFQSmp1Xos9dwOZsObk96ZnO8pDBjoH2aodl14C hvbKBVYbOJFztj5vlrsOZ/5+mmm7mnZOBix6MT97JPZUU7bwQaim+c3y4qqEFF+piInm ++nmnuuIieV7OKn97CV4tc8h/9+TnRZB7jbx+1y5+vQQLsxZEsCyvKYkwR500GLGZk80 7qDtn3DIVt+pfJXpYCXPOlyCjcPNgeAzIn+sRdNhIHRl1CLBsbCBT9CHbIb/1D0z409v kyQx0mQwzlQDkcc34HeDdjnqZdyi7+IpR/QJfcL+tOIPTkj5fobFXShUxZ3x5qWinGeb MxTg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532JWiKdz8UCGXty5V2hOqVIihMuIDk0t1DaK/47SfggKWvzdDmV qgIsHjccTKNuxbFYfQcYH4XIMPIsH5Qz8GT/E077pfncJOv2VGnDKj2vkEp1V8VCUDi3yTOdet/ YM7m1LdQG/xH3nuGswxihjMwX0g== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:28f:b0:2ec:c78d:cc7d with SMTP id z15-20020a056808028f00b002ecc78dcc7dmr2610636oic.208.1647382232246; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 15:10:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyPTq+4slSzvGFi+Pc0Q+T45lfMAx1zAPc2CPr2l3CS2WVg98Wkf4Z/j/hCEL4qs/m9QAQ5Lg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:28f:b0:2ec:c78d:cc7d with SMTP id z15-20020a056808028f00b002ecc78dcc7dmr2610618oic.208.1647382232020; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 15:10:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from treble ([2600:1700:6e32:6c00::48]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e5-20020acab505000000b002ecfd33334bsm181844oif.53.2022.03.15.15.10.30 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 15 Mar 2022 15:10:31 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2022 15:10:27 -0700 From: Josh Poimboeuf To: Christophe Leroy Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] static_call: Remove __DEFINE_STATIC_CALL macro Message-ID: <20220315221027.adisw5th4t6aibrb@treble> References: <1e0a61a88f52a460f62a58ffc2a5f847d1f7d9d8.1647253456.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> <329074f92d96e3220ebe15da7bbe2779beee31eb.1647253456.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <329074f92d96e3220ebe15da7bbe2779beee31eb.1647253456.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=jpoimboe@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: x86@kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , Dave Hansen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt , Jason Baron , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Ard Biesheuvel Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 11:27:36AM +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote: > Only DEFINE_STATIC_CALL use __DEFINE_STATIC_CALL macro now when > CONFIG_HAVE_STATIC_CALL is selected. > > Only keep __DEFINE_STATIC_CALL() for the generic fallback, and > also use it to implement DEFINE_STATIC_CALL_NULL() in that case. > > Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy Acked-by: Josh Poimboeuf -- Josh