From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C36EAC433F5 for ; Fri, 22 Apr 2022 17:49:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4KlMNW5Dv0z3bpB for ; Sat, 23 Apr 2022 03:49:15 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20201202 header.b=JFxldeSw; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org (client-ip=2604:1380:4601:e00::1; helo=ams.source.kernel.org; envelope-from=kuba@kernel.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20201202 header.b=JFxldeSw; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4601:e00::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4KlMMm44vLz2yyM for ; Sat, 23 Apr 2022 03:48:36 +1000 (AEST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A098B83216; Fri, 22 Apr 2022 17:48:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6BE67C385A0; Fri, 22 Apr 2022 17:48:29 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1650649710; bh=5eG88j23VfpqEXG5LElKEOANPUif8PLVVEOgW3NWPM8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=JFxldeSwtEKgk9Lc8kRCQDX6OUJaNJqjczwvWjMV4j3OqtctIRIdLWhgVFbHcrF3q 6RV2w/ktTedzqZubriC/58H3Vdm9JiPVMTZntT5U6PsWNK7vp6Lf1pJVILEyJGxmS+ qbW6cqz9aSs5BypgxKnfiub0ZMs/SwHrot2cRn1CQZuR4f0sF4Z4oMH0Z+a459fUj/ AqyDYdPlcTk4kUXYFN7XRqxWUhAFDdRXCLT5AegHPef/SkanQTZdABcipo326XcIeu cDK0+ZCKSi/1Lz6pPb+mOUQxdS1svIyOTdYSc7OWhpV+sUpJYcDte2V/RzhDmTOY++ fOwXTN8nCbK0w== Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 10:48:28 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Bjorn Helgaas Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Remove unused SLOW_DOWN_IO Message-ID: <20220422104828.75c726d0@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20220415190817.842864-1-helgaas@kernel.org> References: <20220415190817.842864-1-helgaas@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Rich Felker , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, Yoshinori Sato , linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-atm-general@lists.sourceforge.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Ivan Kokshaysky , Chas Williams <3chas3@gmail.com>, Bjorn Helgaas , Paul Mackerras , Matt Turner , Paolo Abeni , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, "David S . Miller" , Richard Henderson Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Fri, 15 Apr 2022 14:08:10 -0500 Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > From: Bjorn Helgaas > > Only alpha, ia64, powerpc, and sh define SLOW_DOWN_IO, and there are no > actual uses of it. The few references to it are in situations that are > themselves unused. Remove them all. > > It should be safe to apply these independently and in any order. The only > place SLOW_DOWN_IO is used at all is the lmc_var.h definition of DELAY, > which is itself never used. Hi Bojrn! Would you mind reposting just patches 1 and 3 for networking? LMC got removed in net-next (commit a5b116a0fa90 ("net: wan: remove the lanmedia (lmc) driver")) so the entire series fails to apply and therefore defeats all of our patch handling scripts :S