From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81BE6C433FE for ; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 21:17:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4KnHrs1D60z3bns for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2022 07:17:01 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20201202 header.b=hwaE9jDa; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org (client-ip=2604:1380:4601:e00::1; helo=ams.source.kernel.org; envelope-from=helgaas@kernel.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20201202 header.b=hwaE9jDa; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4601:e00::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4KnHr95BCkz3bd3 for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2022 07:16:25 +1000 (AEST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1DE2B818A1; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 21:16:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C828DC385A7; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 21:16:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1650921380; bh=hYLOMTe1/Z2MH6N3yk6aVKeMHTDRSg9Z2C4T2OGqECc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:From; b=hwaE9jDaUpBkOfLikisxRqEQgrwvFHBLfDX94LCe6d9c+B89thcG5+fzwWzRgnd4F UqUXrmcbmYubtRf7FE8Jwkk5GeEGdqgd1W0d9M3Ortq26Qx+Pzo3/WPJEIVTC7WQXV UqJS35401jf9zTe5lsxkUy0T166bIgMuSSN7lwxzplqPNpJ/wNdQpLoMCC6TtgHccT M0cMO7eNzOkzlE9ZBqaO/uL2DyV2iLpQzQsHCdz5Ps55sIkShx2Z0vt3n4IP50CnBE Hd2GnEAYbJXgRkBeNmR+2LIgqx7mu2Vli7MtwrWAnKBbTjJt82hvzuQRfEDmUCGo1Y JC8dirsrUmtgw== Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 16:16:17 -0500 From: Bjorn Helgaas To: Jakub Kicinski Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Remove unused SLOW_DOWN_IO Message-ID: <20220425211617.GA1658400@bhelgaas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220422104828.75c726d0@kernel.org> X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Rich Felker , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, Yoshinori Sato , linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-atm-general@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ivan Kokshaysky , Chas Williams <3chas3@gmail.com>, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas , Paul Mackerras , Matt Turner , Paolo Abeni , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, "David S . Miller" , Richard Henderson Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 10:48:28AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Fri, 15 Apr 2022 14:08:10 -0500 Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > From: Bjorn Helgaas > > > > Only alpha, ia64, powerpc, and sh define SLOW_DOWN_IO, and there are no > > actual uses of it. The few references to it are in situations that are > > themselves unused. Remove them all. > > > > It should be safe to apply these independently and in any order. The only > > place SLOW_DOWN_IO is used at all is the lmc_var.h definition of DELAY, > > which is itself never used. > > Hi Bojrn! Would you mind reposting just patches 1 and 3 for networking? > LMC got removed in net-next (commit a5b116a0fa90 ("net: wan: remove the > lanmedia (lmc) driver")) so the entire series fails to apply and therefore > defeats all of our patch handling scripts :S Sure, coming up, with reduced cc: list.