From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00271C433EF for ; Wed, 27 Apr 2022 13:47:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4KpKnK1bplz3bpw for ; Wed, 27 Apr 2022 23:47:33 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org (client-ip=2604:1380:4601:e00::1; helo=ams.source.kernel.org; envelope-from=srs0=av7o=vf=goodmis.org=rostedt@kernel.org; receiver=) Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4601:e00::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4KpKmq0X2cz2xlF for ; Wed, 27 Apr 2022 23:47:06 +1000 (AEST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5EB3BB82766; Wed, 27 Apr 2022 13:47:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 714F6C385A9; Wed, 27 Apr 2022 13:47:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2022 09:46:58 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: "Naveen N. Rao" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ftrace: Drop duplicate mcount locations Message-ID: <20220427094658.502fcaee@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <9b1b816cff1f479c8de0e9baa5a6ac680b84e17e.1651047542.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <9b1b816cff1f479c8de0e9baa5a6ac680b84e17e.1651047542.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, Nick Desaulniers , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nathan Chancellor , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Wed, 27 Apr 2022 15:01:21 +0530 "Naveen N. Rao" wrote: > In the absence of section symbols [1], objtool (today) and recordmcount > (with a subsequent patch) generate __mcount_loc relocation records with > weak symbols as the base. This works fine as long as those weak symbols > are not overridden, but if they are, these can result in duplicate > entries in the final vmlinux mcount location table. This will cause > ftrace to fail when trying to patch the same location twice. Fix this by > dropping duplicate locations during ftrace init. > > [1] https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commit;h=d1bcae833b32f1 > > Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao > --- > kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 13 ++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c > index 4f1d2f5e726341..8bc4f282bb3ff4 100644 > --- a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c > +++ b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c > @@ -6496,7 +6496,7 @@ static int ftrace_process_locs(struct module *mod, > struct dyn_ftrace *rec; > unsigned long count; > unsigned long *p; > - unsigned long addr; > + unsigned long addr, prev_addr = 0; > unsigned long flags = 0; /* Shut up gcc */ > int ret = -ENOMEM; > > @@ -6550,6 +6550,16 @@ static int ftrace_process_locs(struct module *mod, > while (p < end) { > unsigned long end_offset; > addr = ftrace_call_adjust(*p++); > + > + /* > + * Drop duplicate entries, which can happen when weak > + * functions are overridden, and __mcount_loc relocation > + * records were generated against function names due to > + * absence of non-weak section symbols > + */ > + if (addr == prev_addr) > + addr = 0; Please don't use the side effect of addr == 0 causing the loop to continue for this logic. The two are not related. Simply call continue. if (addr == prev_addr) continue; -- Steve > + > /* > * Some architecture linkers will pad between > * the different mcount_loc sections of different > @@ -6569,6 +6579,7 @@ static int ftrace_process_locs(struct module *mod, > > rec = &pg->records[pg->index++]; > rec->ip = addr; > + prev_addr = addr; > } > > /* We should have used all pages */