From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D1C0C433F5 for ; Fri, 6 May 2022 08:57:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4KvkwQ4QLjz3fNb for ; Fri, 6 May 2022 18:57:26 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=FU1Ryzcm; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=kjain@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=FU1Ryzcm; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4KvkhH4dT7z3cJK for ; Fri, 6 May 2022 18:46:55 +1000 (AEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098414.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 2467mMdk030993; Fri, 6 May 2022 08:46:50 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=1fa4dEfcOL90pc6Zv0Nqv6gjVZSrl01Wlf1pWeJ27PA=; b=FU1RyzcmtEEJNtsv92g7UE6X0HWPdw2TRpjXPOLFr4J+5AGfF9Pz57cWGSlcAT9zaL6Z 9wtUtIHNlDNQGw7VUa1/Xvc1qrJvwUe9aTSKULKKuyubiTQoKIXwX/0c6hOug2vxHNM0 3OluMHbvOkCf8eLockNvrj1gsrC/KjlQq640mjGBAAwzbY/zZgwYFR3Uz0ICVZPAIsqh wDvB5ziqzZfn2/b3tSBAV93DfuEUqLf64sfo2Lddzrw/L4ET7L5Qpm8JNlsQKKRc044O 32OUdxFuVZWlROZQmY/P7Se57lQBikvPGGqa4IMlIqMETJBuPvGOlI//NkKjr9eP3euN 6g== Received: from ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com (62.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.98]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3fvykvs2v2-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 06 May 2022 08:46:50 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 2468hGmY025057; Fri, 6 May 2022 08:46:48 GMT Received: from b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay12.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.197]) by ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3ftp7fw701-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 06 May 2022 08:46:48 +0000 Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.58]) by b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 2468kjaf32571808 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 6 May 2022 08:46:45 GMT Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EA064C044; Fri, 6 May 2022 08:46:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2321E4C040; Fri, 6 May 2022 08:46:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from li-e8dccbcc-2adc-11b2-a85c-bc1f33b9b810.ibm.com.com (unknown [9.43.19.224]) by d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 6 May 2022 08:46:42 +0000 (GMT) From: Kajol Jain To: mpe@ellerman.id.au, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: [PATCH 19/35] selftest/powerpc/pmu: Add selftest for group constraint check when using same PMC Date: Fri, 6 May 2022 14:15:28 +0530 Message-Id: <20220506084544.56527-20-kjain@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 In-Reply-To: <20220506084544.56527-1-kjain@linux.ibm.com> References: <20220506084544.56527-1-kjain@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: W3ZeDkgP2xLdKcTc_j72mqKZ0zsKlSOI X-Proofpoint-GUID: W3ZeDkgP2xLdKcTc_j72mqKZ0zsKlSOI X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.858,Hydra:6.0.486,FMLib:17.11.64.514 definitions=2022-05-06_02,2022-05-05_01,2022-02-23_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 clxscore=1015 mlxlogscore=999 spamscore=0 phishscore=0 priorityscore=1501 impostorscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2202240000 definitions=main-2205060045 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: kjain@linux.ibm.com, atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com, maddy@linux.ibm.com, disgoel@linux.vnet.ibm.com, rnsastry@linux.ibm.com Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" From: Athira Rajeev Testcase for group constraint check when using events with same PMC. Multiple events in a group asking for same PMC should fail. Testcase uses "0x22C040" on PMC2 as leader and also subling which is expected to fail. Using PMC1 for sibling event should pass the test. Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev --- .../powerpc/pmu/event_code_tests/Makefile | 3 +- .../group_constraint_repeat_test.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/pmu/event_code_tests/group_constraint_repeat_test.c diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/pmu/event_code_tests/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/pmu/event_code_tests/Makefile index 6310634c5beb..ace100e3226e 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/pmu/event_code_tests/Makefile +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/pmu/event_code_tests/Makefile @@ -1,7 +1,8 @@ # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 CFLAGS += -m64 -TEST_GEN_PROGS := group_constraint_pmc56_test group_pmc56_exclude_constraints_test group_constraint_pmc_count_test +TEST_GEN_PROGS := group_constraint_pmc56_test group_pmc56_exclude_constraints_test group_constraint_pmc_count_test \ + group_constraint_repeat_test top_srcdir = ../../../../../.. include ../../../lib.mk diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/pmu/event_code_tests/group_constraint_repeat_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/pmu/event_code_tests/group_constraint_repeat_test.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..371cd05bb3ed --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/pmu/event_code_tests/group_constraint_repeat_test.c @@ -0,0 +1,56 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only +/* + * Copyright 2022, Athira Rajeev, IBM Corp. + */ + +#include +#include "../event.h" +#include "../sampling_tests/misc.h" + +/* The processor's L1 data cache was reloaded */ +#define EventCode1 0x21C040 +#define EventCode2 0x22C040 + +/* + * Testcase for group constraint check + * when using events with same PMC. + * Multiple events in a group shouldn't + * ask for same PMC. If so it should fail. + */ + +static int group_constraint_repeat(void) +{ + struct event event, leader; + + /* Check for platform support for the test */ + SKIP_IF(platform_check_for_tests()); + + /* + * Two events in a group using same PMC + * should fail to get scheduled. Usei same PMC2 + * for leader and sibling event which is expected + * to fail. + */ + event_init(&leader, EventCode1); + FAIL_IF(event_open(&leader)); + + event_init(&event, EventCode1); + + /* Expected to fail since sibling event is requesting same PMC as leader */ + FAIL_IF(!event_open_with_group(&event, leader.fd)); + + event_init(&event, EventCode2); + + /* Expected to pass since sibling event is requesting different PMC */ + FAIL_IF(event_open_with_group(&event, leader.fd)); + + event_close(&leader); + event_close(&event); + + return 0; +} + +int main(void) +{ + return test_harness(group_constraint_repeat, "group_constraint_repeat"); +} -- 2.31.1