From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32531C433F5 for ; Mon, 9 May 2022 09:40:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4KxbkL6GZsz3cdq for ; Mon, 9 May 2022 19:40:10 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com (client-ip=209.85.128.43; helo=mail-wm1-f43.google.com; envelope-from=wei.liu.linux@gmail.com; receiver=) Received: from mail-wm1-f43.google.com (mail-wm1-f43.google.com [209.85.128.43]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Kxbjt27tRz2xBV for ; Mon, 9 May 2022 19:39:45 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-wm1-f43.google.com with SMTP id bg25so8022512wmb.4 for ; Mon, 09 May 2022 02:39:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=MIo4iJaNWWiT8L0aREHccyFQKBU+YIpBaS+29bvc/oc=; b=iIyLU7LcL/ZBLQujpAmanO3fezSR49jtY3GoXMcAVu0sxw9g2gRDxGqrIAgDo0PLlk Hh3dn0+xZvKg0fjVHY8pR3JPKwPxFpDdX5NiXWEiFKuxrqJwQQN8796LPscm+w/9KrrZ etD3+8pJASF3yuja8uEofxAxJStbTsXhGs28A1NOXgUbPR+hUncDXCAl18j9i/I+/XjT FtBWDmV45KHh5y9YXTNWCHeuR2ZcqIQSFpGjDDu3pZRCgWn00P6yNH36NBM/k12xcTYP IecmEdittDjgbarjSGIfYn9Vvx32+R1s1jpqWGKirQ9enS0h4BLM0p8GYh3u/fzEeMS3 UDMw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532KtgIxWSzr2sBhiAkVKwm9ct0S6igKMjPaq6U03DVPjMsnJC0M 538i+cxpBnN9nA+bo9mwBSQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz/KKcTrgbBKiQDbLem0UVallm03r9n1V5yq/fpMjCoclkduFXgbKOowrI9BpO7enF+NSOlDA== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c4c8:0:b0:394:26c5:b79e with SMTP id g8-20020a7bc4c8000000b0039426c5b79emr15176076wmk.15.1652089180818; Mon, 09 May 2022 02:39:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from liuwe-devbox-debian-v2 ([51.145.34.42]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w7-20020adfee47000000b0020c5253d8efsm10503017wro.59.2022.05.09.02.39.39 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 09 May 2022 02:39:40 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 9 May 2022 09:39:38 +0000 From: Wei Liu To: Kees Cook Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/23] Rust support Message-ID: <20220509093938.fdrh5hhhreqi46wn@liuwe-devbox-debian-v2> References: <20220507052451.12890-1-ojeda@kernel.org> <202205070056.ACC3C3D@keescook> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <202205070056.ACC3C3D@keescook> X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Wei Liu , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, Jarkko Sakkinen , linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Miguel Ojeda , live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Linus Torvalds , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Sat, May 07, 2022 at 01:06:18AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > On Sat, May 07, 2022 at 07:23:58AM +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote: > > ## Patch series status > > > > The Rust support is still to be considered experimental. However, > > support is good enough that kernel developers can start working on the > > Rust abstractions for subsystems and write drivers and other modules. > > I'd really like to see this landed for a few reasons: > > - It's under active development, and I'd rather review the changes > "normally", incrementally, etc. Right now it can be hard to re-review > some of the "mostly the same each version" patches in the series. > > - I'd like to break the catch-22 of "ask for a new driver to be > written in rust but the rust support isn't landed" vs "the rust > support isn't landed because there aren't enough drivers". It > really feels like "release early, release often" is needed here; > it's hard to develop against -next. :) +1 to both points. :-)