linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com>,
	Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>, KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
	Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] bpf ppc64: Add instructions for atomic_[cmp]xchg
Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 13:15:44 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220512074546.231616-4-hbathini@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220512074546.231616-1-hbathini@linux.ibm.com>

This adds two atomic opcodes BPF_XCHG and BPF_CMPXCHG on ppc64, both
of which include the BPF_FETCH flag.  The kernel's atomic_cmpxchg
operation fundamentally has 3 operands, but we only have two register
fields. Therefore the operand we compare against (the kernel's API
calls it 'old') is hard-coded to be BPF_REG_R0. Also, kernel's
atomic_cmpxchg returns the previous value at dst_reg + off. JIT the
same for BPF too with return value put in BPF_REG_0.

  BPF_REG_R0 = atomic_cmpxchg(dst_reg + off, BPF_REG_R0, src_reg);

Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
index 504fa459f9f3..df9e20b22ccb 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
@@ -783,6 +783,9 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context *
 		 */
 		case BPF_STX | BPF_ATOMIC | BPF_W:
 		case BPF_STX | BPF_ATOMIC | BPF_DW:
+			u32 save_reg = tmp2_reg;
+			u32 ret_reg = src_reg;
+
 			/* Get offset into TMP_REG_1 */
 			EMIT(PPC_RAW_LI(tmp1_reg, off));
 			tmp_idx = ctx->idx * 4;
@@ -813,6 +816,24 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context *
 			case BPF_XOR | BPF_FETCH:
 				EMIT(PPC_RAW_XOR(tmp2_reg, tmp2_reg, src_reg));
 				break;
+			case BPF_CMPXCHG:
+				/*
+				 * Return old value in BPF_REG_0 for BPF_CMPXCHG &
+				 * in src_reg for other cases.
+				 */
+				ret_reg = bpf_to_ppc(BPF_REG_0);
+
+				/* Compare with old value in BPF_R0 */
+				if (size == BPF_DW)
+					EMIT(PPC_RAW_CMPD(bpf_to_ppc(BPF_REG_0), tmp2_reg));
+				else
+					EMIT(PPC_RAW_CMPW(bpf_to_ppc(BPF_REG_0), tmp2_reg));
+				/* Don't set if different from old value */
+				PPC_BCC_SHORT(COND_NE, (ctx->idx + 3) * 4);
+				fallthrough;
+			case BPF_XCHG:
+				save_reg = src_reg;
+				break;
 			default:
 				pr_err_ratelimited(
 					"eBPF filter atomic op code %02x (@%d) unsupported\n",
@@ -822,15 +843,14 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context *
 
 			/* store new value */
 			if (size == BPF_DW)
-				EMIT(PPC_RAW_STDCX(tmp2_reg, tmp1_reg, dst_reg));
+				EMIT(PPC_RAW_STDCX(save_reg, tmp1_reg, dst_reg));
 			else
-				EMIT(PPC_RAW_STWCX(tmp2_reg, tmp1_reg, dst_reg));
+				EMIT(PPC_RAW_STWCX(save_reg, tmp1_reg, dst_reg));
 			/* we're done if this succeeded */
 			PPC_BCC_SHORT(COND_NE, tmp_idx);
 
-			/* For the BPF_FETCH variant, get old value into src_reg */
 			if (imm & BPF_FETCH)
-				EMIT(PPC_RAW_MR(src_reg, _R0));
+				EMIT(PPC_RAW_MR(ret_reg, _R0));
 			break;
 
 		/*
-- 
2.35.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-05-12  7:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-12  7:45 [PATCH 0/5] Atomics support for eBPF on powerpc Hari Bathini
2022-05-12  7:45 ` [PATCH 1/5] bpf ppc64: add support for BPF_ATOMIC bitwise operations Hari Bathini
2022-05-12  7:45 ` [PATCH 2/5] bpf ppc64: add support for atomic fetch operations Hari Bathini
2022-05-12  7:45 ` Hari Bathini [this message]
2022-05-16  3:03   ` [PATCH 3/5] bpf ppc64: Add instructions for atomic_[cmp]xchg Russell Currey
2022-05-12  7:45 ` [PATCH 4/5] bpf ppc32: add support for BPF_ATOMIC bitwise operations Hari Bathini
2022-05-13  6:58   ` Christophe Leroy
2022-05-12  7:45 ` [PATCH 5/5] bpf ppc32: Add instructions for atomic_[cmp]xchg Hari Bathini
2022-05-13  7:50   ` Christophe Leroy
2022-05-12 18:40 ` [PATCH 0/5] Atomics support for eBPF on powerpc Daniel Borkmann
2022-05-13  6:37   ` Michael Ellerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220512074546.231616-4-hbathini@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=hbathini@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=jniethe5@gmail.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).