linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	Oliver OHalloran <oohall@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] PCI/AER: Handle Multi UnCorrectable/Correctable errors properly
Date: Tue, 17 May 2022 17:28:49 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220517222849.GA1113887@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54ab824c-44a9-239a-9380-2f051f26a079@linux.intel.com>

On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 05:29:45PM -0700, Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy wrote:
> 
> 
> On 5/11/22 4:40 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 03:02:37PM +0000, Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan wrote:
> > > Currently the aer_irq() handler returns IRQ_NONE for cases without bits
> > > PCI_ERR_ROOT_UNCOR_RCV or PCI_ERR_ROOT_COR_RCV are set. But this
> > > assumption is incorrect.
> > > 
> > > Consider a scenario where aer_irq() is triggered for a correctable
> > > error, and while we process the error and before we clear the error
> > > status in "Root Error Status" register, if the same kind of error
> > > is triggered again, since aer_irq() only clears events it saw, the
> > > multi-bit error is left in tact. This will cause the interrupt to fire
> > > again, resulting in entering aer_irq() with just the multi-bit error
> > > logged in the "Root Error Status" register.
> > > 
> > > Repeated AER recovery test has revealed this condition does happen
> > > and this prevents any new interrupt from being triggered. Allow to
> > > process interrupt even if only multi-correctable (BIT 1) or
> > > multi-uncorrectable bit (BIT 3) is set.
> > > 
> > > Also note that, for cases with only multi-bit error is set, since this
> > > is not the first occurrence of the error, PCI_ERR_ROOT_ERR_SRC may have
> > > zero or some junk value. So we cannot cleanly process this error
> > > information using aer_isr_one_error(). All we are attempting with this
> > > fix is to make sure error interrupt processing can continue in this
> > > scenario.
> > > 
> > > This error can be reproduced by making following changes to the
> > > aer_irq() function and by executing the given test commands.
> > > 
> > >   static irqreturn_t aer_irq(int irq, void *context)
> > >           struct aer_err_source e_src = {};
> > > 
> > >           pci_read_config_dword(rp, aer + PCI_ERR_ROOT_STATUS,
> > > 				&e_src.status);
> > >   +       pci_dbg(pdev->port, "Root Error Status: %04x\n",
> > >   +		e_src.status);
> > >           if (!(e_src.status & AER_ERR_STATUS_MASK))
> > 
> > Do you mean
> > 
> >    if (!(e_src.status & (PCI_ERR_ROOT_UNCOR_RCV|PCI_ERR_ROOT_COR_RCV)))
> > 
> > here?  AER_ERR_STATUS_MASK would be after this fix.
> 
> Yes. You are correct. Do you want me to update it and Fixes tag
> and send next version?

I moved the repro details to a bugzilla, updated the commit log as
below, and applied to pci/error for v5.19, thanks!


commit 203926da2bff ("PCI/AER: Clear MULTI_ERR_COR/UNCOR_RCV bits")
Author: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Mon Apr 18 15:02:37 2022 +0000

    PCI/AER: Clear MULTI_ERR_COR/UNCOR_RCV bits
    
    When a Root Port or Root Complex Event Collector receives an error Message
    e.g., ERR_COR, it sets PCI_ERR_ROOT_COR_RCV in the Root Error Status
    register and logs the Requester ID in the Error Source Identification
    register.  If it receives a second ERR_COR Message before software clears
    PCI_ERR_ROOT_COR_RCV, hardware sets PCI_ERR_ROOT_MULTI_COR_RCV and the
    Requester ID is lost.
    
    In the following scenario, PCI_ERR_ROOT_MULTI_COR_RCV was never cleared:
    
      - hardware receives ERR_COR message
      - hardware sets PCI_ERR_ROOT_COR_RCV
      - aer_irq() entered
      - aer_irq(): status = pci_read_config_dword(PCI_ERR_ROOT_STATUS)
      - aer_irq(): now status == PCI_ERR_ROOT_COR_RCV
      - hardware receives second ERR_COR message
      - hardware sets PCI_ERR_ROOT_MULTI_COR_RCV
      - aer_irq(): pci_write_config_dword(PCI_ERR_ROOT_STATUS, status)
      - PCI_ERR_ROOT_COR_RCV is cleared; PCI_ERR_ROOT_MULTI_COR_RCV is set
      - aer_irq() entered again
      - aer_irq(): status = pci_read_config_dword(PCI_ERR_ROOT_STATUS)
      - aer_irq(): now status == PCI_ERR_ROOT_MULTI_COR_RCV
      - aer_irq() exits because PCI_ERR_ROOT_COR_RCV not set
      - PCI_ERR_ROOT_MULTI_COR_RCV is still set
    
    The same problem occurred with ERR_NONFATAL/ERR_FATAL Messages and
    PCI_ERR_ROOT_UNCOR_RCV and PCI_ERR_ROOT_MULTI_UNCOR_RCV.
    
    Fix the problem by queueing an AER event and clearing the Root Error Status
    bits when any of these bits are set:
    
      PCI_ERR_ROOT_COR_RCV
      PCI_ERR_ROOT_UNCOR_RCV
      PCI_ERR_ROOT_MULTI_COR_RCV
      PCI_ERR_ROOT_MULTI_UNCOR_RCV
    
    See the bugzilla link for details from Eric about how to reproduce this
    problem.
    
    [bhelgaas: commit log, move repro details to bugzilla]
    Fixes: e167bfcaa4cd ("PCI: aerdrv: remove magical ROOT_ERR_STATUS_MASKS")
    Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215992
    Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220418150237.1021519-1-sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com
    Reported-by: Eric Badger <ebadger@purestorage.com>
    Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
    Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
    Reviewed-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>

      reply	other threads:[~2022-05-17 22:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-18 15:02 [PATCH v3] PCI/AER: Handle Multi UnCorrectable/Correctable errors properly Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2022-05-11 15:19 ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2022-05-11 23:27 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-05-11 23:39   ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2022-05-11 23:40 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-05-12  0:29   ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2022-05-17 22:28     ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220517222849.GA1113887@bhelgaas \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=oohall@gmail.com \
    --cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).