[PATCH 5.17 129/158] perf test: Fix "all PMU test" to skip hv_24x7/hv_gpci tests on powerpc

[PATCH 5.17 129/158] perf test: Fix "all PMU test" to skip hv_24x7/hv_gpci tests on powerpc

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

From: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

[ Upstream commit 451ed8058c69a3fee29fa9e2967a4e22a221fe75 ]

"perf all PMU test" picks the input events from "perf list --raw-dump
pmu" list and runs "perf stat -e" for each of the event in the list. In
case of powerpc, the PowerVM environment supports events from hv_24x7
and hv_gpci PMU which is of example format like below:

- hv_24x7/CPM_ADJUNCT_INST,domain=?,core=?/
- hv_gpci/event,partition_id=?/

The value for "?" needs to be filled in depending on system and
respective event. CPM_ADJUNCT_INST needs have core value and domain
value. hv_gpci event needs partition_id.  Similarly, there are other
events for hv_24x7 and hv_gpci having "?" in event format. Hence skip
these events on powerpc platform since values like partition_id, domain
is specific to system and event.

Fixes: 3d5ac9effcc640d5 ("perf test: Workload test of all PMUs")
Signed-off-by: Athira Jajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Disha Goel <disgoel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Nageswara R Sastry <rnsastry@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220520101236.17249-1-atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 tools/perf/tests/shell/stat_all_pmu.sh | 10 ++++++++++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/stat_all_pmu.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/stat_all_pmu.sh
index b30dba455f36..9c9ef33e0b3c 100755
--- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/stat_all_pmu.sh
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/stat_all_pmu.sh
@@ -5,6 +5,16 @@
 set -e
 
 for p in $(perf list --raw-dump pmu); do
+  # In powerpc, skip the events for hv_24x7 and hv_gpci.
+  # These events needs input values to be filled in for
+  # core, chip, partition id based on system.
+  # Example: hv_24x7/CPM_ADJUNCT_INST,domain=?,core=?/
+  # hv_gpci/event,partition_id=?/
+  # Hence skip these events for ppc.
+  if echo "$p" |grep -Eq 'hv_24x7|hv_gpci' ; then
+    echo "Skipping: Event '$p' in powerpc"
+    continue
+  fi
   echo "Testing $p"
   result=$(perf stat -e "$p" true 2>&1)
   if ! echo "$result" | grep -q "$p" && ! echo "$result" | grep -q "<not supported>" ; then
-- 
2.35.1

[PATCH 5.17 132/158] perf test bpf: Skip test if clang is not present

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

From: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

[ Upstream commit 8994e97be3eb3c3a7b59d6223018ffab8c272e2d ]

Perf BPF filter test fails in environment where "clang" is not
installed.

Test failure logs:

<<>>
 42: BPF filter                    :
 42.1: Basic BPF filtering         : Skip
 42.2: BPF pinning                 : FAILED!
 42.3: BPF prologue generation     : FAILED!
<<>>

Enabling verbose option provided debug logs which says clang/llvm needs
to be installed. Snippet of verbose logs:

<<>>
 42.2: BPF pinning                  :
 --- start ---
test child forked, pid 61423
ERROR:	unable to find clang.
Hint:	Try to install latest clang/llvm to support BPF.
        Check your $PATH

<<logs_here>>

Failed to compile test case: 'Basic BPF llvm compile'
Unable to get BPF object, fix kbuild first
test child finished with -1
 ---- end ----
BPF filter subtest 2: FAILED!
<<>>

Here subtests, "BPF pinning" and "BPF prologue generation" failed and
logs shows clang/llvm is needed. After installing clang, testcase
passes.

Reason on why subtest failure happens though logs has proper debug
information:

Main function __test__bpf calls test_llvm__fetch_bpf_obj by
passing 4th argument as true ( 4th arguments maps to parameter
"force" in test_llvm__fetch_bpf_obj ). But this will cause
test_llvm__fetch_bpf_obj to skip the check for clang/llvm.

Snippet of code part which checks for clang based on
parameter "force" in test_llvm__fetch_bpf_obj:

<<>>
if (!force && (!llvm_param.user_set_param &&
<<>>

Since force is set to "false", test won't get skipped and fails to
compile test case. The BPF code compilation needs clang, So pass the
fourth argument as "false" and also skip the test if reason for return
is "TEST_SKIP"

After the patch:

<<>>
 42: BPF filter                    :
 42.1: Basic BPF filtering         : Skip
 42.2: BPF pinning                 : Skip
 42.3: BPF prologue generation     : Skip
<<>>

Fixes: ba1fae431e74bb42 ("perf test: Add 'perf test BPF'")
Reviewed-by: Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Athira Jajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Disha Goel <disgoel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Nageswara R Sastry <rnsastry@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220511115438.84032-1-atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 tools/perf/tests/bpf.c | 10 ++++++----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/bpf.c b/tools/perf/tests/bpf.c
index 573490530194..592ab02d5ba3 100644
--- a/tools/perf/tests/bpf.c
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/bpf.c
@@ -222,11 +222,11 @@ static int __test__bpf(int idx)
 
 	ret = test_llvm__fetch_bpf_obj(&obj_buf, &obj_buf_sz,
 				       bpf_testcase_table[idx].prog_id,
-				       true, NULL);
+				       false, NULL);
 	if (ret != TEST_OK || !obj_buf || !obj_buf_sz) {
 		pr_debug("Unable to get BPF object, %s\n",
 			 bpf_testcase_table[idx].msg_compile_fail);
-		if (idx == 0)
+		if ((idx == 0) || (ret == TEST_SKIP))
 			return TEST_SKIP;
 		else
 			return TEST_FAIL;
@@ -370,9 +370,11 @@ static int test__bpf_prologue_test(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unused,
 static struct test_case bpf_tests[] = {
 #ifdef HAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT
 	TEST_CASE("Basic BPF filtering", basic_bpf_test),
-	TEST_CASE("BPF pinning", bpf_pinning),
+	TEST_CASE_REASON("BPF pinning", bpf_pinning,
+			"clang isn't installed or environment missing BPF support"),
 #ifdef HAVE_BPF_PROLOGUE
-	TEST_CASE("BPF prologue generation", bpf_prologue_test),
+	TEST_CASE_REASON("BPF prologue generation", bpf_prologue_test,
+			"clang isn't installed or environment missing BPF support"),
 #else
 	TEST_CASE_REASON("BPF prologue generation", bpf_prologue_test, "not compiled in"),
 #endif
-- 
2.35.1