From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@linux.ibm.com>,
ejb@linux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com,
bigeasy@linutronix.de, dave@stgolabs.net, tglx@linutronix.de,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: [PATCH 09/10] scsi/ibmvscsi: Replace srp tasklet with work
Date: Mon, 30 May 2022 16:15:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220530231512.9729-10-dave@stgolabs.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220530231512.9729-1-dave@stgolabs.net>
Tasklets have long been deprecated as being too heavy on the system
by running in irq context - and this is not a performance critical
path. If a higher priority process wants to run, it must wait for
the tasklet to finish before doing so.
Process srps asynchronously in process context in a dedicated
single threaded workqueue.
Cc: Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
---
drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvscsi.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------
drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvscsi.h | 3 ++-
2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvscsi.c b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvscsi.c
index 63f32f843e75..37cbea8bb0af 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvscsi.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvscsi.c
@@ -86,6 +86,8 @@ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(ibmvscsi_driver_lock);
static struct scsi_transport_template *ibmvscsi_transport_template;
+static struct workqueue_struct *ibmvscsi_wq;
+
#define IBMVSCSI_VERSION "1.5.9"
MODULE_DESCRIPTION("IBM Virtual SCSI");
@@ -117,7 +119,7 @@ static void ibmvscsi_handle_crq(struct viosrp_crq *crq,
* @irq: number of irq to handle, not used
* @dev_instance: ibmvscsi_host_data of host that received interrupt
*
- * Disables interrupts and schedules srp_task
+ * Disables interrupts and schedules srp_work
* Always returns IRQ_HANDLED
*/
static irqreturn_t ibmvscsi_handle_event(int irq, void *dev_instance)
@@ -125,7 +127,7 @@ static irqreturn_t ibmvscsi_handle_event(int irq, void *dev_instance)
struct ibmvscsi_host_data *hostdata =
(struct ibmvscsi_host_data *)dev_instance;
vio_disable_interrupts(to_vio_dev(hostdata->dev));
- tasklet_schedule(&hostdata->srp_task);
+ queue_work(ibmvscsi_wq, &hostdata->srp_work);
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
@@ -145,7 +147,7 @@ static void ibmvscsi_release_crq_queue(struct crq_queue *queue,
long rc = 0;
struct vio_dev *vdev = to_vio_dev(hostdata->dev);
free_irq(vdev->irq, (void *)hostdata);
- tasklet_kill(&hostdata->srp_task);
+ cancel_work_sync(&hostdata->srp_work);
do {
if (rc)
msleep(100);
@@ -206,16 +208,19 @@ static int ibmvscsi_send_crq(struct ibmvscsi_host_data *hostdata,
}
/**
- * ibmvscsi_task: - Process srps asynchronously
+ * ibmvscsi_workfn: - Process srps asynchronously
* @data: ibmvscsi_host_data of host
*/
-static void ibmvscsi_task(void *data)
+static void ibmvscsi_workfn(struct work_struct *work)
{
- struct ibmvscsi_host_data *hostdata = (struct ibmvscsi_host_data *)data;
- struct vio_dev *vdev = to_vio_dev(hostdata->dev);
+ struct ibmvscsi_host_data *hostdata;
+ struct vio_dev *vdev;
struct viosrp_crq *crq;
int done = 0;
+ hostdata = container_of(work, struct ibmvscsi_host_data, srp_work);
+ vdev = to_vio_dev(hostdata->dev);
+
while (!done) {
/* Pull all the valid messages off the CRQ */
while ((crq = crq_queue_next_crq(&hostdata->queue)) != NULL) {
@@ -367,8 +372,7 @@ static int ibmvscsi_init_crq_queue(struct crq_queue *queue,
queue->cur = 0;
spin_lock_init(&queue->lock);
- tasklet_init(&hostdata->srp_task, (void *)ibmvscsi_task,
- (unsigned long)hostdata);
+ INIT_WORK(&hostdata->srp_work, ibmvscsi_workfn);
if (request_irq(vdev->irq,
ibmvscsi_handle_event,
@@ -387,7 +391,7 @@ static int ibmvscsi_init_crq_queue(struct crq_queue *queue,
return retrc;
req_irq_failed:
- tasklet_kill(&hostdata->srp_task);
+ cancel_work_sync(&hostdata->srp_work);
rc = 0;
do {
if (rc)
@@ -2371,7 +2375,7 @@ static int ibmvscsi_resume(struct device *dev)
{
struct ibmvscsi_host_data *hostdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
vio_disable_interrupts(to_vio_dev(hostdata->dev));
- tasklet_schedule(&hostdata->srp_task);
+ queue_work(ibmvscsi_wq, &hostdata->srp_work);
return 0;
}
@@ -2418,15 +2422,25 @@ static int __init ibmvscsi_module_init(void)
if (!ibmvscsi_transport_template)
return -ENOMEM;
+ ibmvscsi_wq = alloc_ordered_workqueue("ibmvscsi_wq", 0);
+ if (!ibmvscsi_wq) {
+ srp_release_transport(ibmvscsi_transport_template);
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+
ret = vio_register_driver(&ibmvscsi_driver);
- if (ret)
+ if (ret) {
+ destroy_workqueue(ibmvscsi_wq);
srp_release_transport(ibmvscsi_transport_template);
+ }
+
return ret;
}
static void __exit ibmvscsi_module_exit(void)
{
vio_unregister_driver(&ibmvscsi_driver);
+ destroy_workqueue(ibmvscsi_wq);
srp_release_transport(ibmvscsi_transport_template);
}
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvscsi.h b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvscsi.h
index e60916ef7a49..f7c52744a206 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvscsi.h
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvscsi.h
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
#include <linux/types.h>
#include <linux/list.h>
#include <linux/completion.h>
+#include <linux/workqueue.h>
#include <linux/interrupt.h>
#include <scsi/viosrp.h>
@@ -90,7 +91,7 @@ struct ibmvscsi_host_data {
struct device *dev;
struct event_pool pool;
struct crq_queue queue;
- struct tasklet_struct srp_task;
+ struct work_struct srp_work;
struct list_head sent;
struct Scsi_Host *host;
struct task_struct *work_thread;
--
2.36.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-30 23:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20220530231512.9729-1-dave@stgolabs.net>
2022-05-30 23:15 ` [PATCH 06/10] scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt: Replace work tasklet with threaded irq Davidlohr Bueso
2022-06-03 11:05 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-05-30 23:15 ` [PATCH 08/10] scsi/ibmvfc: Replace tasklet with work Davidlohr Bueso
2022-06-09 12:30 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-06-28 15:18 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2022-05-30 23:15 ` Davidlohr Bueso [this message]
2022-06-09 15:02 ` [PATCH 09/10] scsi/ibmvscsi: Replace srp " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-06-09 15:46 ` David Laight
2022-06-14 13:25 ` 'Sebastian Andrzej Siewior'
2022-06-14 13:34 ` David Laight
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220530231512.9729-10-dave@stgolabs.net \
--to=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=ejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tyreld@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).