linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: acme@kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org, disgoel@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: maddy@linux.ibm.com, rnsastry@linux.ibm.com,
	tmricht@linux.ibm.com, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	kjain@linux.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: [PATCH] tools/perf/tests: Fix session topology test comparison check
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2022 19:29:39 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220610135939.63361-1-atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)

commit cfd7092c31ae ("perf test session topology: Fix test to
skip the test in guest environment") added check to skip the
testcase if the socket_id can't be fetched from topology info.
But the condition check uses strncmp which should be changed to
!strncmp and to correctly match platform. Patch fixes this
condition check.

Fixes: cfd7092c31ae ("perf test session topology: Fix test to skip the test in guest environment")
Reported-by: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 tools/perf/tests/topology.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/topology.c b/tools/perf/tests/topology.c
index d23a9e322ff5..0b4f61b6cc6b 100644
--- a/tools/perf/tests/topology.c
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/topology.c
@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ static int check_cpu_topology(char *path, struct perf_cpu_map *map)
 	 * physical_package_id will be set to -1. Hence skip this
 	 * test if physical_package_id returns -1 for cpu from perf_cpu_map.
 	 */
-	if (strncmp(session->header.env.arch, "powerpc", 7)) {
+	if (!strncmp(session->header.env.arch, "ppc64le", 7)) {
 		if (cpu__get_socket_id(perf_cpu_map__cpu(map, 0)) == -1)
 			return TEST_SKIP;
 	}
-- 
2.35.1


             reply	other threads:[~2022-06-10 14:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-10 13:59 Athira Rajeev [this message]
2022-06-14 14:38 ` [PATCH] tools/perf/tests: Fix session topology test comparison check Ian Rogers
2022-06-14 19:17   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220610135939.63361-1-atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=disgoel@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kjain@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=rnsastry@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=tmricht@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).