linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 11/14] powerpc/qspinlock: allow propagation of yield CPU down the queue
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 13:04:50 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220711030453.150644-12-npiggin@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220711030453.150644-1-npiggin@gmail.com>

Having all CPUs poll the lock word for the owner CPU that should be
yielded to defeats most of the purpose of using MCS queueing for
scalability. Yet it may be desirable for queued waiters to to yield
to a preempted owner.

s390 addreses this problem by having queued waiters sample the lock
word to find the owner much less frequently. In this approach, the
waiters never sample it directly, but the queue head propagates the
owner CPU back to the next waiter if it ever finds the owner has
been preempted. Queued waiters then subsequently propagate the owner
CPU back to the next waiter, and so on.

Disable this option by default for now, i.e., no logical change.
---
 arch/powerpc/lib/qspinlock.c | 103 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 98 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/qspinlock.c b/arch/powerpc/lib/qspinlock.c
index 4f1dc3322485..c39af19f006e 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/lib/qspinlock.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/qspinlock.c
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
 struct qnode {
 	struct qnode	*next;
 	struct qspinlock *lock;
+	int		yield_cpu;
 	u8		locked; /* 1 if lock acquired */
 };
 
@@ -28,6 +29,7 @@ static int HEAD_SPINS __read_mostly = (1<<13);
 static bool pv_yield_owner __read_mostly = true;
 static bool pv_yield_allow_steal __read_mostly = false;
 static bool pv_yield_prev __read_mostly = false;
+static bool pv_yield_propagate_owner __read_mostly = false;
 
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU_ALIGNED(struct qnodes, qnodes);
 
@@ -197,7 +199,7 @@ static inline struct qnode *get_tail_qnode(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val)
 	BUG();
 }
 
-static void yield_to_locked_owner(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val, bool paravirt, bool clear_mustq)
+static void __yield_to_locked_owner(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val, bool paravirt, bool clear_mustq)
 {
 	int owner;
 	u32 yield_count;
@@ -238,13 +240,76 @@ static void yield_to_locked_owner(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val, bool paravirt
 	cpu_relax();
 }
 
+static void yield_to_locked_owner(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val, bool paravirt)
+{
+	__yield_to_locked_owner(lock, val, paravirt, false);
+}
+
+static void yield_head_to_locked_owner(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val, bool paravirt, bool clear_mustq)
+{
+	__yield_to_locked_owner(lock, val, paravirt, clear_mustq);
+}
+
+static void propagate_yield_cpu(struct qnode *node, u32 val, int *set_yield_cpu, bool paravirt)
+{
+	struct qnode *next;
+	int owner;
+
+	if (!paravirt)
+		return;
+	if (!pv_yield_propagate_owner)
+		return;
+
+	owner = get_owner_cpu(val);
+	if (*set_yield_cpu == owner)
+		return;
+
+	next = READ_ONCE(node->next);
+	if (!next)
+		return;
+
+	if (vcpu_is_preempted(owner)) {
+		next->yield_cpu = owner;
+		*set_yield_cpu = owner;
+	} else if (*set_yield_cpu != -1) {
+		next->yield_cpu = owner;
+		*set_yield_cpu = owner;
+	}
+}
+
 static void yield_to_prev(struct qspinlock *lock, struct qnode *node, int prev_cpu, bool paravirt)
 {
 	u32 yield_count;
+	int yield_cpu;
 
 	if (!paravirt)
 		goto relax;
 
+	if (!pv_yield_propagate_owner)
+		goto yield_prev;
+
+	yield_cpu = READ_ONCE(node->yield_cpu);
+	if (yield_cpu == -1) {
+		/* Propagate back the -1 CPU */
+		if (node->next && node->next->yield_cpu != -1)
+			node->next->yield_cpu = yield_cpu;
+		goto yield_prev;
+	}
+
+	yield_count = yield_count_of(yield_cpu);
+	if ((yield_count & 1) == 0)
+		goto yield_prev; /* owner vcpu is running */
+
+	smp_rmb();
+
+	if (yield_cpu == node->yield_cpu) {
+		if (node->next && node->next->yield_cpu != yield_cpu)
+			node->next->yield_cpu = yield_cpu;
+		yield_to_preempted(yield_cpu, yield_count);
+		return;
+	}
+
+yield_prev:
 	if (!pv_yield_prev)
 		goto relax;
 
@@ -276,7 +341,7 @@ static __always_inline bool try_to_steal_lock(struct qspinlock *lock, bool parav
 			break;
 
 		if (val & _Q_LOCKED_VAL) {
-			yield_to_locked_owner(lock, val, paravirt, false);
+			yield_to_locked_owner(lock, val, paravirt);
 			continue;
 		}
 
@@ -313,6 +378,7 @@ static __always_inline void queued_spin_lock_mcs_queue(struct qspinlock *lock, b
 	node = &qnodesp->nodes[idx];
 	node->next = NULL;
 	node->lock = lock;
+	node->yield_cpu = -1;
 	node->locked = 0;
 
 	tail = encode_tail_cpu();
@@ -334,13 +400,21 @@ static __always_inline void queued_spin_lock_mcs_queue(struct qspinlock *lock, b
 		while (!node->locked)
 			yield_to_prev(lock, node, prev_cpu, paravirt);
 
+		/* Clear out stale propagated yield_cpu */
+		if (paravirt && pv_yield_propagate_owner && node->yield_cpu != -1)
+			node->yield_cpu = -1;
+
 		smp_rmb(); /* acquire barrier for the mcs lock */
 	}
 
 	if (!MAYBE_STEALERS) {
+		int set_yield_cpu = -1;
+
 		/* We're at the head of the waitqueue, wait for the lock. */
-		while ((val = READ_ONCE(lock->val)) & _Q_LOCKED_VAL)
-			yield_to_locked_owner(lock, val, paravirt, false);
+		while ((val = READ_ONCE(lock->val)) & _Q_LOCKED_VAL) {
+			propagate_yield_cpu(node, val, &set_yield_cpu, paravirt);
+			yield_head_to_locked_owner(lock, val, paravirt, false);
+		}
 
 		/* If we're the last queued, must clean up the tail. */
 		if ((val & _Q_TAIL_CPU_MASK) == tail) {
@@ -352,6 +426,7 @@ static __always_inline void queued_spin_lock_mcs_queue(struct qspinlock *lock, b
 		/* We must be the owner, just set the lock bit and acquire */
 		lock_set_locked(lock);
 	} else {
+		int set_yield_cpu = -1;
 		int iters = 0;
 again:
 		/* We're at the head of the waitqueue, wait for the lock. */
@@ -360,7 +435,8 @@ static __always_inline void queued_spin_lock_mcs_queue(struct qspinlock *lock, b
 				lock_set_mustq(lock);
 				val |= _Q_MUST_Q_VAL;
 			}
-			yield_to_locked_owner(lock, val, paravirt,
+			propagate_yield_cpu(node, val, &set_yield_cpu, paravirt);
+			yield_head_to_locked_owner(lock, val, paravirt,
 				pv_yield_allow_steal && (iters > HEAD_SPINS));
 		}
 
@@ -513,6 +589,22 @@ static int pv_yield_prev_get(void *data, u64 *val)
 
 DEFINE_SIMPLE_ATTRIBUTE(fops_pv_yield_prev, pv_yield_prev_get, pv_yield_prev_set, "%llu\n");
 
+static int pv_yield_propagate_owner_set(void *data, u64 val)
+{
+	pv_yield_propagate_owner = !!val;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int pv_yield_propagate_owner_get(void *data, u64 *val)
+{
+	*val = pv_yield_propagate_owner;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+DEFINE_SIMPLE_ATTRIBUTE(fops_pv_yield_propagate_owner, pv_yield_propagate_owner_get, pv_yield_propagate_owner_set, "%llu\n");
+
 static __init int spinlock_debugfs_init(void)
 {
 	debugfs_create_file("qspl_steal_spins", 0600, arch_debugfs_dir, NULL, &fops_steal_spins);
@@ -521,6 +613,7 @@ static __init int spinlock_debugfs_init(void)
 		debugfs_create_file("qspl_pv_yield_owner", 0600, arch_debugfs_dir, NULL, &fops_pv_yield_owner);
 		debugfs_create_file("qspl_pv_yield_allow_steal", 0600, arch_debugfs_dir, NULL, &fops_pv_yield_allow_steal);
 		debugfs_create_file("qspl_pv_yield_prev", 0600, arch_debugfs_dir, NULL, &fops_pv_yield_prev);
+		debugfs_create_file("qspl_pv_yield_propagate_owner", 0600, arch_debugfs_dir, NULL, &fops_pv_yield_propagate_owner);
 	}
 
 	return 0;
-- 
2.35.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-07-11  3:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-11  3:04 [RFC PATCH 00/14] add our own qspinlock implementation Nicholas Piggin
2022-07-11  3:04 ` [RFC PATCH 01/14] powerpc/qspinlock: powerpc " Nicholas Piggin
2022-07-11  3:04 ` [RFC PATCH 02/14] powerpc/qspinlock: add mcs queueing for contended waiters Nicholas Piggin
2022-07-11  3:04 ` [RFC PATCH 03/14] powerpc/qspinlock: use a half-word store to unlock to avoid larx/stcx Nicholas Piggin
2022-07-11  3:04 ` [RFC PATCH 04/14] powerpc/qspinlock: convert atomic operations to assembly Nicholas Piggin
2022-07-11  3:04 ` [RFC PATCH 05/14] powerpc/qspinlock: allow new waiters to steal the lock before queueing Nicholas Piggin
2022-07-11  3:04 ` [RFC PATCH 06/14] powerpc/qspinlock: theft prevention to control latency Nicholas Piggin
2022-07-11  3:04 ` [RFC PATCH 07/14] powerpc/qspinlock: store owner CPU in lock word Nicholas Piggin
2022-07-11  3:04 ` [RFC PATCH 08/14] powerpc/qspinlock: paravirt yield to lock owner Nicholas Piggin
2022-07-11  3:04 ` [RFC PATCH 09/14] powerpc/qspinlock: implement option to yield to previous node Nicholas Piggin
2022-07-11  3:04 ` [RFC PATCH 10/14] powerpc/qspinlock: allow stealing when head of queue yields Nicholas Piggin
2022-07-11  3:04 ` Nicholas Piggin [this message]
2022-07-11  3:04 ` [RFC PATCH 12/14] powerpc/qspinlock: add ability to prod new queue head CPU Nicholas Piggin
2022-07-11  3:04 ` [RFC PATCH 13/14] powerpc/qspinlock: trylock and initial lock attempt may steal Nicholas Piggin
2022-07-11  3:04 ` [RFC PATCH 14/14] powerpc/qspinlock: use spin_begin/end API Nicholas Piggin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220711030453.150644-12-npiggin@gmail.com \
    --to=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).