From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABF73C433EF for ; Sat, 16 Jul 2022 11:35:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4LlR4S5l8Yz3c3R for ; Sat, 16 Jul 2022 21:35:52 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20201202 header.b=RJe1fSMV; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org (client-ip=139.178.84.217; helo=dfw.source.kernel.org; envelope-from=pali@kernel.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20201202 header.b=RJe1fSMV; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [139.178.84.217]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4LlR3l0lN0z3bcv for ; Sat, 16 Jul 2022 21:35:14 +1000 (AEST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 412C260FB8; Sat, 16 Jul 2022 11:35:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7BC54C34115; Sat, 16 Jul 2022 11:35:10 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1657971310; bh=1Nv+mrJbMC45A/7YReRl2eFPsTnci26We2C7a/b5Mzc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=RJe1fSMV5+cEBdR7OMYrY9fZdu/PpceJZ5o5CTouutuwbhIwfjx/GsNWZV9Q/F823 jXarhqth2tqCOg1ix2FLIYe8Xa4QtKzP3nsiFUHot2EgtLts/UpJ+KxGSy+GK1nbMh tDMGNI/9q9c7wsR8kw97fKwDrYVc9+I4ljxXII15hZAm05ARyR1szRaPKiMee+19hy GNbt8w79Oj3n6XiuW4Z/RUg5UI3JWCKINCdPAvzGjGPLF/yzQXk2jf1efl3jBGCCSD sc50r8NcGNPjzFF760LL0fG+C6/lGvXTiUpjM9GYFwKw0UsfTUC9jaPA0qz30TFiTy frli5dg1lr9lA== Received: by pali.im (Postfix) id 4079EA52; Sat, 16 Jul 2022 13:35:07 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2022 13:35:07 +0200 From: Pali =?utf-8?B?Um9ow6Fy?= To: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" , Michael Ellerman Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] powerpc/pci: Add config option for using OF 'reg' for PCI domain Message-ID: <20220716113507.c6loaltpuaj4hrs5@pali> References: <20220706102148.5060-1-pali@kernel.org> <17fb8d12-60f9-09d5-91fa-09d5a5a9a4fd@igalia.com> <20220715171132.ujaexzm4ipad7o4f@pali> <15432ee0-3a33-0b53-b39b-f8b53a7e4345@igalia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <15432ee0-3a33-0b53-b39b-f8b53a7e4345@igalia.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Tyrel Datwyler , Guowen Shan , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Friday 15 July 2022 15:32:56 Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote: > On 15/07/2022 14:11, Pali Rohár wrote: > > [...] > >> > >> I found this sentence a bit weird, "in the similar way like it is doing > >> kernel for other architectures", but other than that: > > > > If you have some idea how to improve commit description, let me know and > > I can change it. > > > > Oh, for example: "in similar way the kernel is doing for other > architectures". The sentence idea is perfectly fine, it's just that it's > a bit oddly constructed IMHO heh > > Cheers! Ou, sorry. English is not my first nor second language. Michael, should I resend this patch series with Guilherme's suggestion for changing working in commit description? Or will you adjust it manually?