From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13860C25B0E for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 03:44:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4M870L4xrgz3fFh for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 13:44:02 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=Oy7t7vAA; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=rmclure@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=Oy7t7vAA; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4M86vM4Rlpz3c2W for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 13:39:42 +1000 (AEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098417.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 27J3YDtK012712; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 03:39:36 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=pp1; bh=kxmuhJM2SGL2klW7yPeJSptmMzUwvOr1G+8LwTD0jDA=; b=Oy7t7vAAwBqAhN7DFf+BqHuNYYoOfsIWj1Yd+tUKuCPZ6ed7x0zqEixWtefHQm0An5p8 tc7MW/6o7GR/btJEEF4+Pk/8iB+y6k+aKV08/j3gPscwDZC+dA0Bv8xmATCDQSUndefV xTvMQFgT1gA6KSDQZzZtO1Mt8NkZn3M6tYCB/k1xIaS8YGCTGN4duAWtIL7FC9SERDKi O382hvoNLO69SD2+s5F5I3eVyTrLrriBNEegnxGJEP/SJ5rcqLcR5kH4eF+n5h0xdvx5 c9L+nGkCySDnYpHExcOfBAp920b1YAG9jSCE5REg0sU7zKZ21YZ9d8OJNSRHQK0Xb/jf 5Q== Received: from ppma01fra.de.ibm.com (46.49.7a9f.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [159.122.73.70]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3j22qkr3e7-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 19 Aug 2022 03:39:35 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma01fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma01fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 27J3atNv019364; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 03:39:34 GMT Received: from b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay12.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.197]) by ppma01fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3hx3k950t1-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 19 Aug 2022 03:39:34 +0000 Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.61]) by b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 27J3dVWg34013666 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 19 Aug 2022 03:39:32 GMT Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBF7911C050; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 03:39:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BE4411C04A; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 03:39:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ozlabs.au.ibm.com (unknown [9.192.253.14]) by d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 03:39:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from civic.. (haven.au.ibm.com [9.192.254.114]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.au.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8F08360306; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 13:39:29 +1000 (AEST) From: Rohan McLure To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: [PATCH v3 03/18] powerpc/32: Remove powerpc select specialisation Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2022 13:37:51 +1000 Message-Id: <20220819033806.162054-4-rmclure@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20220819033806.162054-1-rmclure@linux.ibm.com> References: <20220819033806.162054-1-rmclure@linux.ibm.com> X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: 1jLmDSI4BNGGoF_yRTy4U-JUllBmDvmM X-Proofpoint-GUID: 1jLmDSI4BNGGoF_yRTy4U-JUllBmDvmM Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Proofpoint-UnRewURL: 0 URL was un-rewritten MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.895,Hydra:6.0.517,FMLib:17.11.122.1 definitions=2022-08-19_02,2022-08-18_01,2022-06-22_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=816 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 suspectscore=0 priorityscore=1501 impostorscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2207270000 definitions=main-2208190013 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Rohan McLure Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Syscall #82 has been implemented for 32-bit platforms in a unique way on powerpc systems. This hack will in effect guess whether the caller is expecting new select semantics or old select semantics. It does so via a guess, based off the first parameter. In new select, this parameter represents the length of a user-memory array of file descriptors, and in old select this is a pointer to an arguments structure. The heuristic simply interprets sufficiently large values of its first parameter as being a call to old select. The following is a discussion on how this syscall should be handled. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/13737de5-0eb7-e881-9af0-163b0d29a1a0@csgroup.eu/ As discussed in this thread, the existence of such a hack suggests that for whatever powerpc binaries may predate glibc, it is most likely that they would have taken use of the old select semantics. x86 and arm64 both implement this syscall with oldselect semantics. Remove the powerpc implementation, and update syscall.tbl to refer to emit a reference to sys_old_select for 32-bit binaries, in keeping with how other architectures support syscall #82. Signed-off-by: Rohan McLure --- V1 -> V2: Remove arch-specific select handler V2 -> V3: Remove ppc_old_select prototype in . Move to earlier in patch series --- arch/powerpc/include/asm/syscalls.h | 2 -- arch/powerpc/kernel/syscalls.c | 17 ----------------- arch/powerpc/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl | 2 +- .../arch/powerpc/entry/syscalls/syscall.tbl | 2 +- 4 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/syscalls.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/syscalls.h index 675a8f5ec3ca..739498c358a1 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/syscalls.h +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/syscalls.h @@ -18,8 +18,6 @@ long sys_mmap2(unsigned long addr, size_t len, unsigned long fd, unsigned long pgoff); long ppc64_personality(unsigned long personality); long sys_rtas(struct rtas_args __user *uargs); -int ppc_select(int n, fd_set __user *inp, fd_set __user *outp, - fd_set __user *exp, struct __kernel_old_timeval __user *tvp); long ppc_fadvise64_64(int fd, int advice, u32 offset_high, u32 offset_low, u32 len_high, u32 len_low); diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/syscalls.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/syscalls.c index fc999140bc27..ef5896bee818 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/syscalls.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/syscalls.c @@ -63,23 +63,6 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE6(mmap, unsigned long, addr, size_t, len, return do_mmap2(addr, len, prot, flags, fd, offset, PAGE_SHIFT); } -#ifdef CONFIG_PPC32 -/* - * Due to some executables calling the wrong select we sometimes - * get wrong args. This determines how the args are being passed - * (a single ptr to them all args passed) then calls - * sys_select() with the appropriate args. -- Cort - */ -int -ppc_select(int n, fd_set __user *inp, fd_set __user *outp, fd_set __user *exp, struct __kernel_old_timeval __user *tvp) -{ - if ((unsigned long)n >= 4096) - return sys_old_select((void __user *)n); - - return sys_select(n, inp, outp, exp, tvp); -} -#endif - #ifdef CONFIG_PPC64 long ppc64_personality(unsigned long personality) { diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl b/arch/powerpc/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl index 2600b4237292..4cbbb810ae10 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl @@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ 79 common settimeofday sys_settimeofday compat_sys_settimeofday 80 common getgroups sys_getgroups 81 common setgroups sys_setgroups -82 32 select ppc_select sys_ni_syscall +82 32 select sys_old_select sys_ni_syscall 82 64 select sys_ni_syscall 82 spu select sys_ni_syscall 83 common symlink sys_symlink diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/entry/syscalls/syscall.tbl b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/entry/syscalls/syscall.tbl index 2600b4237292..4cbbb810ae10 100644 --- a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/entry/syscalls/syscall.tbl +++ b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/entry/syscalls/syscall.tbl @@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ 79 common settimeofday sys_settimeofday compat_sys_settimeofday 80 common getgroups sys_getgroups 81 common setgroups sys_setgroups -82 32 select ppc_select sys_ni_syscall +82 32 select sys_old_select sys_ni_syscall 82 64 select sys_ni_syscall 82 spu select sys_ni_syscall 83 common symlink sys_symlink -- 2.34.1